The Effectiveness of Progressive Tension Suture at Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Harvest

광배근 근피판 거상 후 점진적 긴장 봉합술의 유용성

  • Moon, Joo Bong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Breast Center, College of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Park, Jung Min (W Plastic Clinic) ;
  • Kwon, Yong Seok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Breast Center, College of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Lee, Keun Cheol (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Breast Center, College of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Kim, Seok Kwun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Breast Center, College of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Cho, Se Heon (Department of General Surgery, Breast Center, College of Medicine, Dong-A University)
  • 문주봉 (동아대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실. 유방센터) ;
  • 박정민 (W 성형외과) ;
  • 권용석 (동아대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실. 유방센터) ;
  • 이근철 (동아대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실. 유방센터) ;
  • 김석권 (동아대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실. 유방센터) ;
  • 조세헌 (동아대학교 의과대학 일반외과학교실. 유방센터)
  • Received : 2007.04.12
  • Published : 2007.09.10

Abstract

Purpose: The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is a versatile flap used in a variety of reconstructive procedures. The most common complication of LD muscle flap is donor site seroma, reported to occur in 20 to 79 percent of cases. The formation of dead space under the flap is intimately associated with seroma formation. The authors think that the use of progressive tension suture at closing donor site can decrease the formation of dead space and ultimately reduce the incidence of donor site seroma. Methods: A retrospective review was performed with 38 patients who underwent latissimus dorsi muscle harvest for breast reconstruction from March 2003 to September 2004. Progressive tension sutures were used during donor site closure in 22 patients. This group was compared with controls group(16 patients) who underwent latissimus dorsi muscle harvest without using this technique. Operation time, length of hospital stay, period of drainage, complication, and satisfaction about postoperative scar of donor site were examined. Results: The average length of hospital stay was 10.2 days and 12.7 days, and the mean duration of drainage were 7.3 days and 11.7 days in each progressive suture group and control group. These results were statistically significant (p<0.05). In the 22 patients who underwent progressive tension suture, none had seroma, hematoma or skin necrosis. In control group(16 patients), there happened one seroma formation and one partial skin necrosis. These complications were healed by aspiration of seroma and wound revision. The patients' satisfaction was not statistically significant, but the higher points were given by the patients who underwent progressive tension suture. Conclusion: This technique, progressive tension suture, is an effective method to reduce or eliminate donor site seroma, which is the most common complication associated with latissimus dorsi muscle harvest.

Keywords

References

  1. Quillen CG: Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 63: 664, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197905000-00010
  2. Davis JP, Nield DV, Garth RJ, Breach NM: The latissimus dorsi flap in head and neck reconstructive surgery: a review of 121 procedures. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 17: 487, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01702.x
  3. May JW Jr, Gallico GG III, Jupiter J, Savage RC: Free latissimus dorsi muscle flaps with skin graft for treatment of traumatic chronic bony wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 641, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198404000-00022
  4. Banic A, Wulff K: Latissimus dorsi free flaps for total repair of extensive lower leg injuries in children. Plast Reconstr Surg 79: 769, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198705000-00016
  5. Pollock H, Pollock T: Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 2583, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200006000-00047
  6. Dabb RW, Davis RM: Latissimus dorsi free flaps in the elderly: an alternative to below-knee amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 633, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198404000-00021
  7. Rios JL, Pollock T, Adams WP: Progressive tension sutures to prevent seroma formation after latissimus dorsi harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 112: 1779, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000090542.68560.69
  8. Muhlbauer W, Olbrish R: The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Chir Plast 4: 27, 1977
  9. Bostwick J 3rd, Scheflan M: The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap: a one-stage breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 7: 71, 1980
  10. Khouri RK, Shaw WW: Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 29: 1086, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198908000-00005
  11. Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A, Zlatoff P, Rivoire M: Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: a 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 1461, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00020
  12. Schwabegger A, Ninkovic M, Brenner E, Anderl H: Seroma as a common donor site morbidity after harvesting the latissimus dorsi flap: observations on cause and prevention. Ann Plast Surg 38: 594, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199706000-00005
  13. Titley OG, Spyrou GE, Fatah MF: Preventing seroma in the latissimus dorsi donor site. Br J Plast Surg 50: 106, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(97)91321-7