Estimation of Kinetic Coefficient and Assimilated Nutrients Mass in SBR Process

연속회분식 반응 공정에서 동역학적 계수 및 미생물합성에 사용된 영양물질 산정

  • Ji, Dae-Hyun (Department of Urban Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Woo (Department of Urban Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Ho (Department of Urban Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kune (Daejeon Development Institute)
  • Received : 2007.05.24
  • Accepted : 2007.08.17
  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the variations of the kinetic coefficients and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), N and P mass used for assimilation of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system with the variation of SRTs; SRTs of 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, 15.0 and 20.0 days were tested in one cycle of SBR operation to determine the optimum conditions for the operation of the SBR and estimate its COD, nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiencies. The SBR system was operated under the conditions as follows: an operation time of 6 hours per cycle, a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 12 hours, an influent COD loading of $0.4kg/m^3/day$, and an influent nitrogen loading of $0.068kgT-N/m^3/day$. The yield coefficient (Y) and decay rate coefficient ($k_d$) were estimated to be 0.4198 kgMLVSS/kgCOD and $0.0107day^{-1}$ by calculating the removal rate of substrate according to the variation of SRT. Considering total nitrogen amount removed by sludge waste process, eliminated by denitrification, and in clarified water effluent with reference to 150 mg/cycle of influent nitrogen amount, the percentage of nitrogen mass balance from the ratio of the nitrogen amount in effluent (N output) to that in influent (N input) for Runs 1~5 were 95.5, 97.0, 95.5, 99.5, and 95.5%, respectively, which is well accounted for, with mass balances close to 100%.

Keywords

References

  1. 정진영, 연속회분식 반응기를 이용한 고농도 암모니아성 질소 함유 폐수의 처리. 공학박사학위논문, 한국과학기술원 (1999)
  2. Alleman, J. E. and Irvine, R. L., Storage-induced denitrification using sequencing batch reactor operation, Water Research, 14, pp. 1483-1488 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90014-7
  3. Arora, M. L., Dewin, F. B. and Margaret, B. U., Technology evaluation of sequencing batch reactors, JWPCF, 57(8), pp. 867-875 (1985)
  4. Baker, P. S. and Dold, P. L., COD and nitrogen mass balances in activated sludge systems, Water Research, 29(2), pp. 633-643 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)00155-Z
  5. Battistoni, P., Angelis, A. D., Boccadora, R. and Bolzonella, D., An automatically controlled alternate oxic-anoxic process for small municipal wastewater treatment plants, Ind. Eng, Chem. Res., 42, pp. 509-515 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020376g
  6. Bernal-Martinez, A., Gonzalez, O. and Gonzalez-Martinez, S., Nutrient removal and sludge age in a sequencing batch reactor, Bioprocess Engineering, 23, pp. 41-45 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1007/s004499900118
  7. Brdjanovic, D., Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Hooijmans, C. M., Alaerts, G. J. and Heijnen, J. J., Minimal aerobic sludge retention time in biological phosphorus removal system, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 60(3), pp. 326-332 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981105)60:3<326::AID-BIT8>3.0.CO;2-J
  8. Fan Xiao-Jun, Urbain, V., Qian, Y. and Manem, J., Nitrification and mass balance with a membrain bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment, Wat. Sci. Tech., 34(1-2), pp. 129-136 (1996)
  9. Gupta, S. K. and Sharma, R., Biological oxidation of high strength nitrogenous wastewater, Water Research, 30(3), pp. 593-600 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00172-7
  10. Kargi, F. and Uygur, A., Nutrient removal performance of a sequencing batch reactor as a function of the sludge age, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 31, pp. 842-847 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00209-0
  11. Kulikowska, D., Klimiuk, E. and Drzewicki, A., $BOD_5$ and COD removal and sludge production in SBR working with or without anoxic phase, Bioresource Technology, 87, pp. 1428-1432 (2007)
  12. Ng, W. J., Ong, S. L. and Faisal, H., An algorithmic approach for system-specific modelling of activated sludge bulking in an SBR, Environmental Modelling & Software, 15, pp. 199-210 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00035-3
  13. Obaja, D., Mace, S., Costa, J., Sans, C. and Mara-Alvarez, J., Nitrification, denitrification and biological phosphorus removal in pigerry wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor, Bioresource Technology, 87, pp. 103- 111 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00229-8
  14. Okada, M. and Sudo, R., Performance of sequencing batch reactor activated sludge processes for simultaneous removal of nitrogen, phosphorus and BOD as applied to small community sewage treatment, Wat. Sci. Tech., 18, pp. 363-370 (1986) https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1986.0309
  15. Pochana, K., Jurg, K. and Paul, L., Model development for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification, Wat. Sci. Tech., 39(1), pp. 235-243 (1999a)
  16. Pochana, K. and Jurg, K., Study of factors affecting simultaneous nitirification and denitrification(SND), Wat. Sci. Tech., 39(6), pp. 61-68 (1999b)
  17. Rim, Y. T., Yang, H. J., Yoon, C. H., Kim, Y. S., Seo, J. B., Ryu, J. K. and Shin, E. B., A full-scale test of a biological nutrients removal system using the sequencing batch reactor activated sludge rocess, Wat. Sci. Tech.. 35(1), pp. 241-247 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00902-X
  18. Schrocter, W. D., Dold, P. L. and Marais, G. v. R., The COD/VSS ratio of the volatile solids in the activated sludge process, Research Report, W45, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town (1982)
  19. Shin, S. W., Ji, D. H., Lee, J. K. and Lee, K. H., Comparison of nitrogen removal characteristics and nitrification /denitrification rate In SBR using real and synthetic wastewater, KSWST, 15(2), pp. 47-55 (2007)
  20. Silverstein, J. and Schroeder, E. D., Performance of SBR activated sludge process with nitrification/ denitrification, JWPCF, 55, pp. 377-384 (1983)
  21. Sin, G., Insel, G., Lee, D. S. and Vanrolleghem, P. A., Optimal but robust N and P removal in SBRs: A model based sysmatic study of operation, Water Sci. Technol., 50, pp. 97- 105 (2004) https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0676
  22. WRC, Theory, Design and Operation of Nutrient Removal Activated Sludge Processes, Water Research Commission of South Africa (1984)