교육활동의 놀이적 가치 분석을 통한 교육과정의 새로운 의미 탐색

A Study of a New Meaning of Currere from a Perspective of the Value of Play in Educational Activities

  • 투고 : 2007.03.05
  • 심사 : 2007.04.18
  • 발행 : 2007.04.30

초록

This study attempts to explore the possibility of finding a new meaning of currere through an analysis of the value of play in educational activities. It does three different kinds of works for the purpose. First, it tried to clarify the value of play by analyzing the texts written by Kant, Gadamer, and Huizinga, who had approached a play from philosophical and esthetical perspectives. Second, it analyzed curricular theories established by such scholars as Tyler, Peters, and Dewey in order to clarify the meaning of educational values presupposed by those curricular theories. Third, it examined a possibility of finding a new meaning of currere by emphasizing the value of play in educational activities.Through the study, a researcher finds that the value of play lies in the fun the player experienced while playing and that educational value can be defined in the form of the value of play in an educational setting. If the value of play in education is paid enough attention, currere can carry a new meaning. Currere meant traditionally a course horses should follow, which represents a very conservative view of education whereas currere can now mean a trace in which students are learning for the sake of having a fun. Students are encouraged to study for the sake of having a fun.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김규욱, 듀이의 경험이론에 비추어 본 도구주의의 재해석, 교육원리연구 1(1). pp.1-50, 1996
  2. 박철홍, 듀이의 '하나의 경험'에 비추어 본 교육적 경험의 의미: 수단으로서의 지식과 내재적 가치의 의미, 교육철학, 13, 1995
  3. 엄태동, 존 듀이 교육학에 대한 오해와 새로운 이해, 교육원리연구 6(1), 2001
  4. 엄태동, 초등교육의 재개념화, 학지사, 2003.
  5. 유혜령, 유아의 역할 놀이에 나타난 모방과 창조의 미학, 유아교육연구 24(3), 2004
  6. 이홍우, 교육과정탐구, 박영사, 1993
  7. 장상호, 학문과 교육(상), 서울대학교 출판부, 1997
  8. 장상호, 학문과 교육(하), 서울대학교 출판부, 2000
  9. 장상호, 학문과 교육(중I), 서울대학교 출판부, 2005
  10. 최성욱, 학교와 교육의 관계를 통하여 본 교육사회학의 학문적 성격 고찰. 석사학위논문. 서울대학교 대학원, 1998
  11. 최인숙, 칸트와 가다머에게서의 놀이 개념의 의미. 한국칸트학회편, 칸트와 현대 유럽 철학. 철학과 현실사, 2001
  12. 최인숙, 칸트. 살림, 2005
  13. 한명희, 교육의 미학적 탐구. 집문당, 2002
  14. Caillois, R., Les jeux et les hommes, 1958. 이상률(역), 놀이와 인간. 문예출판사, 2003
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Finding flow, 1997. 이희재(역), 몰입의 즐거움. 해냄, 2006
  16. Dewey, J. , Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1952
  17. Dewey, J. , Experience and education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1938
  18. Foucault, M., Surveiller et punir, 1975. 오생근(역), 감시와 처벌. 서울: 나남출판, 1996
  19. Gadamer, H. G., Truth and method(J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum, 1996
  20. Huizinga, J., Homo Ludens, A study of the play element in culture, 1955. 김윤수 (역), 호모 루덴스. 서울: 까치, 1993
  21. Kant, I., Critique of the power of judgement, 2001. 이석윤(역), 판단력 비판. 서울: 박영사, 2005
  22. Nyberg, D. & Egan, K., The erosion of education: Socialization and the schools. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1981
  23. Peters, R. S. , Ethics and education, 1966. 이홍우외(역), 윤리학과 교육. 서울: 교육과학사, 1986
  24. Piaget, J., Play, dreams, and imitation in children. New York: Norton, 1962
  25. Pinar, W. F., What is curriculum theory? Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003
  26. Smilansky, S., The effects of socio-dramatic play on disadvantaged preschool children. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1968
  27. Tyler, R. W. , Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1949
  28. Vygotsky, L., 'Play and its role in the mental development of the child.' In J.S. Bruner, A. Jolly & K. Sylva(Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. New York: Basic Books, pp.537-554, 1976
  29. Warnke, G., Gadamer: Hermeneutics, tradition and reason. CA: Stanford University Press, 1994
  30. Wolf, D. & Grollman, S. H., 'Ways of playing: Individual differences in imaginative style.' In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The play of children: Current theory and research. Basel, Switzerland: Karger. pp.46-63, 1982