THE EFFECTS OF TOOTH MOVEMENT AFTER CORTICOTOMY ON THE SURROUNDING BONE OF UPPER MOLAR IN RATS

백서의 상악 구치 주위골의 피질골 절단술 후 치아이동의 영향

  • Lee, Seung-Yeon (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Clnic Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Su-Hyun (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medical, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Yong-Hee (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medical, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Won (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Clnic Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 이승연 (가톨릭대학교 임상치과학대학원 구강악안면외과학과) ;
  • 박수현 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과학과) ;
  • 박용희 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과학과) ;
  • 이원 (가톨릭대학교 임상치과학대학원 구강악안면외과학과)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the change of the osteoclastic activity in the surrounding bone with or without tooth movement after corticotomy by histologic study. Eighteen male Sprague Dawley rats with an average body weight of 300 g(range 250-350 g) were used. The rats were divided into three groups of six animals. They were operated corticotomy-assisted tooth movement and killed after 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 weeks after tooth movement. Corticotomy was done in the surrounding of the both upper first molar. A split mouth design was used by referring to the contralateral side as control. After flap suturing, the upper left first molar was moved anteriorly by closed coil spring. The force applied was 1 N. The average of tooth movement of the 1 week group was $0.24{\pm}0.09mm,\;0.20{\pm}0.26mm$ in 2 weeks group and $0.41{\pm}0.39mm$ in 3 weeks group, respectively. The difference between the 1 week and the 2 weeks groups was very small to compare with the 3 weeks group. In the treatment group, the average numbers of cells that positively reacted to TRAP were 14.5 in the 1 week group, 12.0 in the 2 weeks group, and 6.0 in the 3 weeks group. In the control group, the numbers were 8.3 in the 1 week group, 12.8 in the 2 week group, and 1.5 in the 3 week group, respectively. The amount of tooth movement of the 3 week group was about twice as large as those of the 1 week and 2 week groups. From the standpoint of histology, the average number of cells that positively reacted to TRAP was initially larger in the treatment group than in the control group, similar in both group in 2 weeks, and became less in the treatment group in 3 weeks. Additionally, in the control group, their activity of osteoclast was higher in 2 weeks than in 1 week, and decreased rapidly in 3 weeks.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung KR, Oh MY, Ko SJ: Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2001;35(5):331-9
  2. Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ: Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21(1):9-19
  3. Frost HM: The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(248):283-93
  4. Frost HM: The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part II. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(248):294-309
  5. Kim T, Handa A, Iida J, Yoshida S: RANKL expression in rat periodontal ligament subjected to a continuous orthodontic force. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52(3):244-50. Epub 2006 Nov 13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.10.003
  6. Iino S, Sakoda S, Ito G, Nishimori T, Ikeda T, Miyawaki S: Acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement by alveolar corticotomy in the dog.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4):448.e1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.004
  7. Tran Van PT, Vignery A, Baron R: Cellular kinetics of the bone remodeling sequence in the rat. Anat Rec 1982;202(4):445-51 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092020403
  8. Rody WJ Jr, King GJ, Gu G: Osteoclast recruitment to sites of compression in orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120(5):477-89 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.118623
  9. Verna C, Zaffe D, Siciliani G: Histomorphometric study of bone reactions during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Bone 1999;24(4):371-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00009-5
  10. Pfeifer JS: The reaction of alveolar bone to flap procedures in man. Periodontics. 1965;20:135-40
  11. Yaffe A, Fine N, Binderman I: Regional accelerated phenomenon in the mandible following mucoperiosteal flap surgery.J Periodontol 1994;65(1):79-83 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.1.79
  12. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Ericsson I: The effect of progressive tooth mobility on destructive periodontitis in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1978;5(3):213-25 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1978.tb02282.x
  13. Roberts WE: Bone tissue interface. Int J Oral Implantol 1988;5(1):71-4
  14. Melsen B: Tissue reaction to orthodontic tooth movement-a new paradigm. Eur J Orthod 2001;23(6):671-81 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.6.671
  15. Frost HM: Wolff􀅯s Law and bone􀅯s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64(3):175-88
  16. Vignery A, Baron R: Dynamic histomorphometry of alveolar bone remodeling in the adult rat. Anat Rec 1980;196(2):191-200 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091960210
  17. Tran Van PT, Vignery A, Baron R: Cellular kinetics of the bone remodeling sequence in the rat. Anat Rec 1982;202(4):445-51 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092020403
  18. Baron R, Tross R, Vignery A: Evidence of sequential remodeling in rat trabecular bone: morphology, dynamic histomorphometry, and changes during skeletal maturation. Anat Rec 1984;208(1):137-45 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092080114
  19. Li XJ, Jee WSS, Ke HZ, Mori S, Akamine T: Age-related changes of cancellous and cortical bone histomorphometry in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Cells and Materials suppl 1991:1:25-35
  20. Verna C, Dalstra M, Melsen B: The rate and the type of orthodontictooth movement is influenced by bone turnover in a rat model. Eur J Orthod 2000;22(4):343-52