상하악 악교정수술 후 입술 기울기변화

CHANGE OF LIP CANTING AFTER BIMAXILLARY ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY

  • 이준휘 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 홍종락 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김영호 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 교정과)
  • Lee, Jun-Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Jong-Rak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2007.12.31

초록

Purpose: The purpose of study was to investigate the correlationship between lip canting change and occlusal canting change after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, and the ratio of lip canting change and occlusal canting change after the surgery. Patients and methods: The subjects for this study was obtained from a group of 25 patients who took bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for occlusal canting correction at the Department of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea between January 2000 and December 2005 and a patient's chart had to contain a resting frontal facial photograph in natural head position and a corresponding PA cephalogram in occlusion on the same day before the surgery and post-op 6 months later. The lip canting change was assessed with the angle each labial commissure and the bipupilary reference line. And, the occlusal caning change in the frontal plane was assessed with the angle between the each maxillary first molar occulasal surface and the bi-frontozygomatic suture reference line. Results: In angular measurement, average occlusal canting change was $3.09^{\circ}$ and standard deviation was $1.05^{\circ}$, average lip canting change was $1.56^{\circ}$ and standard deviation was $1.05^{\circ}$. In linear measurement, average occlusal canting change was 2.41mm and standard deviation was 2.75mm, average lip canting change was 1.18mm and standard deviation was 0.43mm. Lip canting correction ration to occlusal canting correction was 51.5(${\pm}8.4$)% in angular measurement and 48.8(${\pm}9.1$)% in linear measurement. Under Pearson's correlation analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.869 in angular measurement and 0.887 in linear measurement(p-value < 0.01). High correlationship was shown between occlusal canting change and lip canting change. Conclusion: First, Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery can correct lip canting as well as occlusal canting. Second, The average amount of lip canting correction is $51.5{\pm}8.4%,\;48.8{\pm}9.1%$ of occlusal canting correction in the study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gazit-Rappaport T, Weinreb M, Gazit E: Quantitative evaluation of lip symmetry in functional asymmetry. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:443-450 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.5.443
  2. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG: Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod 1994;64:89-98
  3. Benson KJ, Laskin DM: Upper lip asymmetry in adults during smiling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:396-398 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.21874
  4. Padwa BL, Kaiser MO, Kaban LB: Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:811-816; discussion 817 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90338-4
  5. Eckhardt CE, Cunningham SJ: How predictable is orthognathic surgery? Eur J Orthod 2004;26:303-309 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.3.303
  6. Koh CH, Chew MT: Predictability of soft tissue profile changes following bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class III Chinese patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1505-1509 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.022
  7. Jacobson R, Sarver DM: The predictability of maxillary repositioning in LeFort I orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:142-154 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125576
  8. Namano S, Behrend DA, Harcourt JK, Wilson PR: Angular asymmetries of the human face. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:41-46
  9. Marinetti CJ: The lower muscular balance of the face used to lift labial commissures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1153-1162; discussion 1163-1154 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199909040-00042
  10. Pelissier P, Pistre V, Bustamante K, Martin D, Baudet J: [The modiolus. Comparative anatomy, embryological and physiological review, surgical importance]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2000;45:41-47
  11. Klein AW: Contraindications and complications with the use of botulinum toxin. Clin Dermatol 2004;22:66-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2003.12.026
  12. Yellich GM, McNamara JA, Jr., Ungerleider JC: Muscular and mandibular adaptation after lengthening, detachment, and reattachment of the masseter muscle. J Oral Surg 1981;39:656-665
  13. Villoria JM: A new method of elongation of the corner of the mouth. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;49:52-55 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197201000-00010