DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE ARCHES CLUSTER MASS FUNCTION

  • Kim, Sung-Soo S. (Dept. of Astronomy & Space Science, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Figer, Donald F. (Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kudritzki, Rolf P. (Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii) ;
  • Naharro, F. (Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

We have analyzed H and $K_s$-band images of the Arches cluster obtained using the NIRC2 instrument on Keck with the laser guide star adaptive optics (LGS AO) system. With the help of the LGS AO system, we were able to obtain the deepest ever photometry for this cluster and its neighborhood, and derive the background-subtracted present-day mass function (PDMF) down to $1.3M_{\bigodot}$ for the 5"-9" annulus of the cluster. We find that the previously reported turnover at $6M_{\bigodot}$ is simply due to a local bump in the mass function (MF), and that the MF continues to increase down to our 50 % completeness limit ($1.3M_{\bigodot}$) with a power-law exponent of ${\Gamma}$ = -0.91 for the mass range of 1.3 < M/$M_{\bigodot}$ < 50. Our numerical calculations for the evolution of the Arches cluster show that the ${\Gamma}$ values for our annulus increase by 0.1-0.2 during the lifetime of the cluster, and thus suggest that the Arches cluster initially had ${\Gamma}$ of $-1.0{\sim}-1.1$, which is only slightly shallower than the Salpeter value.

Keywords

References

  1. Bonnell, I. A., Larson, R. B., & Zinnecker, H. 2006, astroph/0603447
  2. Eisenhauer, F., Quirrenbach, A., Zinnecker, H., & Genzel, R. 1998, Stellar content of the galactic starburst template NGC 3603 from adaptive optics observations, ApJ, 498, 278 https://doi.org/10.1086/305552
  3. Figer, D. F., Kim, S. S., Morris, M., Serabyn, E., Rich, R. M., & McLean, I. S. 1999, Hubble space telescope/NICMOS observations of massive stellar clusters near the galactic Center, ApJ, 525, 750 https://doi.org/10.1086/307937
  4. Figer, D. F. 2005, An upper limit to the masses of stars, Nature, 434, 192 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03293
  5. Kim, S. S., Morris, M., & Lee, H. M. 1999, Evaporation of compact young clusters near the galactic Center, ApJ, 525, 228 https://doi.org/10.1086/307892
  6. Kim, S. S., Figer, D. F., Lee, H. M., & Morris, M. 2000, N-body simulations of compact young clusters near the galactic center, ApJ, 545, 301
  7. Kim, S. S., Figer, D. F., Kudritzki, R. P., & Najarro, F. 2006, The Arches cluster mass function, ApJ, 653, L113 https://doi.org/10.1086/510529
  8. Kroupa, P. 2002, The initial mass function of stars: evidence for uniformity in variable systems, Science, 295, 82 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067524
  9. Morris, M. 1993, Massive star formation near the Galactic center and the fate of the stellar remnants, ApJ, 408, 496 https://doi.org/10.1086/172607
  10. Palla, F., & Stahler, S. W. 1993, The pre-main-sequence evolution of intermediate-mass stars, ApJ, 418, 414
  11. Salpeter, E. E. 1955, The luminosity function and stellar evolution, ApJ, 121, 161 https://doi.org/10.1086/145971
  12. Stolte, A., Grebel, E. K., Brandner, W., & Figer, D. F. 2002, The mass function of the Arches cluster from Gemini adaptive optics data, A&A, 394, 459 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021118
  13. Stolte, A., Brandner, W., Grebel, E. K., Lenzen, R., & Lagrange A.-M. 2005, The Arches cluster: evidence for a truncated mass function?, ApJ, 628, L113 https://doi.org/10.1086/432909
  14. Weidner, C., & Kroupa, P. 2004, Evidence for a fundamental stellar upper mass limit from clustered star formation, MNRAS, 348, 187 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07340.x
  15. Yang, Y., Park, H. S., Lee, M. G., & Lee, S.-G. 2002, Gemini near-IR photometry of the Arches cluster near the Galactic center, JKAS, 35, 131

Cited by

  1. THE STARBURST CLUSTER WESTERLUND 1: THE INITIAL MASS FUNCTION AND MASS SEGREGATION vol.145, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/46