대한세포병리학회지 (The Korean Journal of Cytopathology)

대한세포병리학회 (The Korean Society for Cytopathology)
권호 표지

유방의 세침흡인 세포검사 -악성 병변의 일반적인 세포 소견-

General Cytological Characters of Malignant Breast Lesions

  • 김지연 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 병리학 교실)
  • Kim, Jee-Yeon (Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of breast disease is recognized to be highly accurate and cost effective, especially when this is used in combination with clinical examination and imaging as part of a triple approach. A probabilistic/categorical approach is used for the classification of breast FNA specimens. Criteria are defined from the perspective of the likelihood of making a definitive diagnosis of cancer on excision. This approach is an accurate way of classifying breast FNA specimens, and this can be reliably applied regardless of the level of experience of the pathologist for interpreting the case. When a definitive diagnosis of malignancy is made, the next step is to determining the specific histologic types of the malignancy according to their cytological features. In order to make an accurate diagnosis of carcinoma and for correct typing a tumor, an adequate, correctly sampled aspirate without any other artifacts is required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kline TS, Joshi LP, Neal HS. Fine needle aspiration of the breast: diagnosis and pitfalls. A review of 3545 cases. Cancer 1979;44:1458-64 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197910)44:4<1458::AID-CNCR2820440440>3.0.CO;2-T
  2. Palombini L, Fulciniti F, Vetrani A, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsies of breast masses: a critical analysis of 1956 cases in 8 years. Cancer 1988:61;2273-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19880601)61:11<2273::AID-CNCR2820611122>3.0.CO;2-#
  3. Silverman JF, Lannin DR, O'Brien K, Norris HT. The triage role of fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast masses: diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness. Acta Cytol 1987;31:731-6
  4. Sneige N, Singletary SE. Fine needle aspiration of the breast: diagnostic problems and approaches to surgical management. Pathol Ann 1994;29:281-301
  5. Thomas PA, Vazquez MF, Waisman J. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and frozen section of palpable mammary lesions. Mod Pathol 1990;3:570-4
  6. Page D, Johnson J, Dupont W. Probabilistic approach to the reporting of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Cancer Ctyopathol 1997;81;6-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970225)81:1<6::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-S
  7. Massod S, Fryberg E, McLellan G, et al. Cytologic differentiation between proliferative and nonproliferative breast disease in mammographically guided fine needle aspirates. Diag Cytopathol 1991;7:581-90 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840070607
  8. Sneige N, Staerkel G, Caraway N, Fanning T, Katz R. A plea for uniform terminology and reporting of breast fine needle aspirates. The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Proposal. Acta Cytol 1994;12;971-2
  9. Wells CA, Ellis IO, Zakhour HD, et al. Guidelines for cytology procedures and reporting on fine needle aspirates of the breast. Cytology Subgroup of the National Coordinating Committee for Breast Cancer Screening Pathology. Cytopathology 1994:5:316-34 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00437.x
  10. Wang HH, Ducatman BS. Fine needle aspiration of the breast. A probabilistic approach to diagnosis of carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1998;42:285-9 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331604
  11. Gong GY, Ahn SH, Park KC, Choe GY, Yu ES, Lee IC. Estrogen receptor analysis in fine needle aspirates and frozen sections from human breast carcinomas. Korean J Cytopathol 1994:5;10-4
  12. Ayata G, Abu-Jawdeh GM, Fraser JL, Garcia LW, Upton MP, Wang HH. Accuracy and consistency in application of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2003;47:973-8 https://doi.org/10.1159/000326670
  13. Gornstein B, Jacobs T, Bedard Y, et al. Interobserver agreement of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine-needle aspirations on ThinPrep. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30:389-95 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20041
  14. Dziura BR, Bonfiglio TA. Needle cytology of the breast: a quantitative and qualitative study of the cells of benign and malignant ductal neoplasia. Acta Cytol 1979;23:332-40
  15. Helpap B, Tschubel K. The significance of the imprint cytology in breast biopsy diagnosis. Acta Cytol 1978;22:133-7
  16. Bettifora H. Intracytoplasmic lumina in breast carcinoma: a helpful histopathological feature. Arch Pathol 1975;99:614-7
  17. Kern WH. The cytopathology of hyperplastic and neoplastic mammary duct epithelium: cytologic and ultrastructural studies. Acta Cytol 1972;16:120-129
  18. McKee GT. Cytopathology of the breast. New York; Oxford University Press. 2002;187-192
  19. Koss LG. Diagnostic cytology and histopathologic bases 5th ed. Philadelphia; JP Lippincott. 2006;1104-22
  20. Sykes JA, Recher L, Jernstroma PH et al. Morphological investigation of human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst:1968;40:195-223
  21. Jayaram G, Swain M, Chew MT, Yip CH. Cytologic appearances in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. A study of 21 cases. Acta Cytol 2000;44:169-74 https://doi.org/10.1159/000326356
  22. Abdulla M, Hombal S, al-Juwaiser A, Stankowich D, Ahmed M, Ajrawi T. Cellularity of lobular carcinoma and its relationship to false negative fine needle aspiration results. Acta Cytol 2000;44:625-632 https://doi.org/10.1159/000328538
  23. Leach C, Howell LP. Cytodiagnosis of classic lobular carcinoma and its variants. Acta Cytol 1992;36:199-202
  24. Ronbinson IA, McKee G, Jackson PA, Cook MG, Kissin MW. Lobular carcinoma of the breast; Cytological features supporting the diagnosis of lobular cancer. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;13:196-201 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840130304
  25. de las Morenas A, Crespo P, Moroz K, Donnelly MM. Cytologic diagnosis of ductal versus lobular carcinoma of the breast. Acta Cytol 1995;39:865-9
  26. Greeley CK, Frost AR. Cytologic features of ductal and lobular carcinoma in fine needle aspirates of the breast. Acta Cytol 1997;41:333-40 https://doi.org/10.1159/000332521
  27. Chun YK, Ko IH. Fine Needle Aspiration cytology of medullary carcinoma of the breast. A case report. Korean J Cytopathol 1994;5:57-60
  28. Dawson AE, Mulford DK. Fine needle aspiration of mucinous (colloid) breast carcinoma. Nuclear grading and mammographic and cytologic finding. Acta Cytol 1998;42:668-82 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331824
  29. Wong NL, Wan SK, Comparative cytology of mucocele like lesion and mucinous carcinoma of the breas in fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2000;44:765-70 https://doi.org/10.1159/000328559
  30. Kim MK, Kwon GY, Gong GY. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic hypersecretory carcinoma of the breast. A case report. Acta Cytol 1997;41;892-6 https://doi.org/10.1159/000332724
  31. Lee WY, Cheng L, Chang TW. Diagnosing invasive cystic hypersecretory duct carcinoma of the breast with fine needle aspiration cytology. A case report. Acta Cytol 1999;43:273-6 https://doi.org/10.1159/000330992
  32. Eom MS, Park JK, Jung SH, Lee KG. The fine needle aspiration cytologic features of apocrine carcinoma of the breast. A case report. Korean J Cytopathol 2003:12;76-81
  33. Jin SY, Lee DW, Kwak JJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of apocrine carcinoma of the breast. Two case report. Korean J Cytopathol 1992:3;67-74
  34. Fischler DF, Sneige N, Ordonez NG, Fornage BD. Tubular carcinoma of the breast; cytologic features in fine-needle aspirations and application of monoclonal anti-alpha-smooth muscle actin in diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;10:120-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840100205
  35. Lee JD. Aspiration diagnostic cytology. Seoul. Daihak Publishing Co. 1999;91-102
  36. de la Torre M, Lindholm K, Lindgren A. fine needle aspiration cytology of tubular breast carcinoma and radial scar. Acta Cytol 1994;38;884-90
  37. Lamb J, McGoogan E. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast in invasive carcinoma of tubular type and in radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions. Cytopathol 1994;5;17-26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00123.x
  38. Evans AZT, Hussein AH. A microglandular adenosis-like lesion simulating tubular adenocarcinoma of the breast. A case report with cytological and histological appearances. Cytopathol 1990;1:311-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.1990.tb00365.x
  39. Gupta RK, Green C, Naran S, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;20:82-4 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199902)20:2<82::AID-DC8>3.0.CO;2-0
  40. Stanley MW, Tani EM, Rutquist LE, Skoong L. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:184-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840090215
  41. Kim NR, Ko YH, Oh YL. Fine needle aspiration cytology for secretory carcinoma of the breast in a female adult. A case report. Korean J Cytopathol 2000;11:25-9
  42. Shinagawa T, Tadokoro M, Kitamura H, Mizuguchi K, Kushima M. Secretory carcinoma of the breast. Correlation of aspiration cytology and histology. Acta Cytol 1994;38:909-14
  43. Vesoulis Z, Kashkari S. Fine needle aspiration of secretory breast carcinoma resembling lactational changes: a case report. Acta Cytol 1998;42:1032-6 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331954
  44. Min SK, Cha HJ, Kim JM, Chu YC. Fine needle aspiration cytologic findings of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. A case report. Korean J Cytopathol 1996;7:202-6
  45. Bondeson L, Lindholm K, Mackee GT, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D. Prediction of invasiveness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: Invasive vs. in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:315-20 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199711)17:5<315::AID-DC2>3.0.CO;2-9
  46. McKee GT, Tambouret H, Finkelstein D. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: Invasive vs in situ carcinoma. Diagnostic Cytopathol 2001;25:73-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2006
  47. Sneige N, White VA, Katz RL, Troncoso P, Libshitz HI, Hortobagyi GN. Ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast: fine-needle aspiration cytology of 12 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1989;5(4):371-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840050406
  48. Istvanic S, Fischer AH, Banner BF, Eaton DM, Larkin AC, Khan A. Cell blocks of breast FNAs frequently allow diagnosis of invasion or histological classification of proliferative changes. Diagn Cytopathol 2007;35:263-269 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20630
  49. Bofin AM, Lyderen S, Hagmar BM. Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31:207-215 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20098