DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지구 내부에 대한 고등학교 학생들의 정신모형 탐색

Investigation of High School Students' Mental Models about the Earth's Interior

  • 발행 : 2007.10.31

초록

본 연구는 지구 내부에 대한 학생들의 정신모형을 분석하고 대안개념을 조사한 것이다. 연구는 고등학교 1학년 126명의 학생들을 대상으로 그리기 과제와 면담을 병행하여 실시하였다. 연구를 수행하기 위하여 그리기 과제와 분류틀을 제작하였다. 면담과 그리기 과제의 결과물들 통하여 부호화 틀에 따라 네 단계의 인지적 모형으로 분류하였고, 대안 개념의 유형을 파악하였다. 아울러 학생들의 성별에 따른 정신모형의 관련성을 비교하였다. 연구 결과에서 대부분의 학생들은 지구 내부에 대하여 많은 대안 개념을 보였다. 분류된 정신모형은 소박한 모형이 11%, 불안정 모형이 81%, 개념적 모형이 8%로 나타났으며, 정적 정신모형으로 분류된 학생은 69%로 나타났다. 정신모형의 성별 분포에서는 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate students' mental models and alternative conceptions about the Earth's interior. A total of 126 10th grade students participated in this study. They were requested to draw Earth's interior tasks and were interviewed about their mental models. A coding frame was designed to classify the students' drawings and interview responses, and then a four step cognitive model was established based on the frame of coding. In addition, the relationship of mental models was compared in terms of students' gender, and the type of alternative conceptions was analysed. The research results showed a variety of alternative conceptions on the interior of the Earth. The classified mental models showed naive mental model (11%), unstable mental model (81%), conceptual model (8%), while 69% of all sampled students accounted for the static process. The gender difference in the cognitive model showed no statistical significance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박지연, 이경호, 2004, 과학개념변화 연구에서 학생의 개념에 대한 이해: 오개념에서 정신모형까지. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), 621-637
  2. 송진웅, 1993, 교사의 과학자에 대한 이미지와 존경하는 과학자. 한국과학교육학회지, 13(1), 48-55
  3. 오준영, 김유신, 2006, 천문 현상들을 설명하는 예비 초등교사들의 정신모형의 연구: 계절과 달의 위상변화. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), 68-87
  4. 이기영, 2006, 상황에 따른 개념 유형의 국면 분석을 통한 중학교 과학 영재아들의 조석에 간한 정신모형 탐색. 한국지구과학학회지, 27(1), 6-14
  5. 정구송, 2006, 존재론적 범주와 정신모델에 근거한 지각과 지구 내부에 대한 고등학교 학생들의 대안개념. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문, 159 p
  6. Beilfuss, M., 2004, Exploring conceptual understandings of ground-water through student's interviews and drawings. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, 146 p
  7. Chi, M.T., 1998, The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International journal of science Education, 20 (10), 1231-1256 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201005
  8. Chi, M.T., 2000, Cognitive understanding levels. Encyclopedia of psychology. Kazkin, A.E. (ed), 2: 146-151. APU and Oxford University Press
  9. Dicker, R., Kafantaris, V., Coletti, D.J., Padula, G., Pleak, R.R., and Kane, J.M., 2004, Lithium treatment of acute mania in adolescents: A placebo-controlled discontinuation study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43 (8), 984-993
  10. diSessa, A.A., 1993, Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1002&3_2
  11. Dove, J., 2000, Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of science Education, 21 (5), 485-497 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290534
  12. Edens, K. and Potter, E., 2003, Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103 (3), 135-144 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18230.x
  13. Glynn, S., 2004, Guidelines for drawing mental models available on-line http://www.coe.uga.edu/edpshchlfaculty/glynn/guidelines/guidenlines.html
  14. Greca, I.M. and Moreira, M.A., 2001, Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and Learning of physics. Science Education, 85 (6), 106-121
  15. Gobet, J.D., 2005, The effects of different learning tasks on model-building in plate tectonics: Diagramming versus explaining. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53 (4), 444-455 https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.444
  16. Hall-Wallace, M., 2002, Visualizing earth's inaccessible interior-what works for students? Proceedings of the Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, USA
  17. Johnson-Laird, P.N., 1983, Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of lanuage, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
  18. Katharyn, E. and Ketter, N., 1999, Using analogies to teach plate tectonics concepts. Journal of Geoscience Education, 47 (5), 449-454 https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-47.5.449
  19. Lakoff, G and Johnson, M., 1980, Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, USA, 276 p
  20. Libarkin, J.C., Beilfuss, M., and Kurdziel, J., 2003, Research methodologies in science education: Mental models and cognition in education. Journal of Geo-science Education, 51 (1), 121-126
  21. Lillo, J., 1994, An analysis of the annotated drawings of the internal structure of the earth made by students aged 10-15 from primary and secondary schools in Spain. Teaching Earth Sciences, 19 (3), 83-89
  22. Marques, L. and Thompson D., 1997, Misconceptions and conceptual changes concerning continental drift and plate tectonics among Portuguese students aged 16-17. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15 (2), 195 https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150206
  23. Paivio, A., 1990, Mental representations: A dual-coding approach (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 322 p
  24. Van der Veer, G, 2000, Mental models of incidental human-machine interaction www. Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved Jun, 10, 2002, http://www.cs.vu.n1/gerrit/mmi9910-reportl.doc
  25. Vosniadou, S. and Brewer, W.F., 1992, Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24 (4), 535-585 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
  26. Wittmann, M.C; 2002, The object coordination class applied to wave pulses: Analysing student reasoning in wave physics. International Journal of science Education, 24 (1), 97-118 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066944