Journal of the Korean earth science society (한국지구과학회지)

The Korean Earth Science Society (한국지구과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Application of Affective-Cognitive Ambivalence Theory in Environmental Risk Attitude: The Case Study of Marion County, Ohio in the U.S.

  • Lee, Jae-Young (Department of Environmental Education, Kongju National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyon-Yong (Department of Earth Science Education, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Fortner, Rosanne W. (COSEE Great Lakes Director and Professor Emeritus at The Ohio State University)
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Using data from 132 telephone interviewees, we examined the role of affective-cognitive ambivalence in forming overall attitude and behavior toward toxic chemical and radioactive waste issues in Marion, Ohio in the U.S. In order to compare attitudinal preference, participants were divided into four A-C groups: action-group (Affective+/Cognitive+), detached-group (A-/C+), concerned-group (A+/C-), and inaction-group (A-/C-). Affective and cognitive components interacted, producing redundant influences on overall attitudes and judgments as frequently observed and postulated in previous attitude studies. The results showed that the action-group who were feeling unsafe and believed that environmental accidents had happened or are happening in Marion were less willing to move to the area than other three groups who were feeling safe and/or doubted reports of contamination and its relation with leukemia. Affective and cognitive components were found to have redundant influences on overall attitude. It was also observed that affective-cognitive ambivalence theory has a great potential for explaining the mechanism by which people form attitudes, especially when people have moderate or positive feelings (e.g. sympathy or eagerness for resources) toward the objects and/or when uncertainty is a major feature of environmental issue under consideration (e.g. global climate change).

Keywords

References

  1. Abelson, R.P., Kinder, D.R., Peter, M.D., and Fiske, S.T., 1982, Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619-630 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.619
  2. Allen, J.B. and Ferrand, J.L., 1999, Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 31 (3), 338-353 https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972137
  3. Beckler, S.J., 1984, Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191-1205 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191
  4. Bjerke, T., Reitan, O., and Kellert, S.R., 1998, Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Society and Natural Resources, 11, 169-178 https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929809381070
  5. Burger, J., Sanchez, J., Gibbons, J.W., Ondrof, J., Ramos, R., Mcmahon, M., Gaines, K.F., Lord, C., Fulmer, M., and Gochfeld, M., 1999, Attitudes and perceptions about ecological resources and hazards of people living around the Savannah River site. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 57, 195-211 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005967608994
  6. Cheong, C., 2003, The environmental perceptions of preservice secondary school teachers about the global environment. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 24 (4), 273-280
  7. Edwards, R., 1999a, EPA steps up search for lead in Marion soils. Columbus Dispatch October 8, 1999. Columbus, OH
  8. Edwards, R., 1999b, Officials want probe of Marion laboratory. The Columbus Dispatch October 9, 1999. Columbus, OH
  9. Edwards, R., 1999c, Some skeptical of EPA tests showing river valley air is safe. Columbus Dispatch September 4. Columbus, OH
  10. Festinger, L., 1957, A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson Evanson, IL, USA, 291 p
  11. Flynn, J., Siovic, P., and Mertz, C., 1994, Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis 14, 1101-1108 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x
  12. Geller, E.S., 1995, Integrating behaviorism and humanism for environmental protection. Journal of Social Issues, 51 (4), 179-195 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01354.x
  13. Ginsburg, H. and Miller, S., 1982, Sex differences in children's risk-taking behavior. Child Development, 53, 426-428 https://doi.org/10.2307/1128985
  14. Heider, F., 1958, The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 322 p
  15. Lavine, H., Thomsen, C.J., Zanna, M.P., and Borgida, E., 1998, On the Primary of Affect in the Determination of Attitudes and Behavior: The Moderating Role of Affective-Cognitive Ambivalence. Journal of Experiential Social Psychology, 34, 398-421 https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1357
  16. Lee, J.A .and Holden, S.J.S., 1999, Understanding the determinants of Environmentally Conscious Behavior. Psychology Marketing, 16, 373-392 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199908)16:5<373::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-S
  17. Lee, J.Y. and Fortner, R.W., 2000, Classification of environmental issues by perceived certainty and tangibility. International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 53, 898-908
  18. Lee, H. and Fortner, R.W., 2006, Elementary students' perceptions of Earth systems and environmental issues. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27 (7), 705-714
  19. Manfredo, M.J., Zinn, H.C., Sikorowski, L., and Jones, J., 1998, Public acceptance of mountain lion management: a case study of Denver, Colorado, and nearby foothills areas. Wildlife Society of Bulletin, 26, 964-970
  20. Pelletier, L.G., Tuson, K.M., Green-Demers, I., and Noels, K., 1998. Why are you doing things for the environment?: The motivation toward the environmental scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437-468 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01714.x
  21. Riechard, D. and MaGarrity, J., 1994, Early adolescents' perceptions of relative risk from 10 societal and environmental hazards. Journal of Environmental Education, 26,16-23 https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1994.9941429
  22. Riepenhoff, J., 1998, Abbie's story. Colurnbus Dispatch October 4. Columbus, O.H
  23. Stem, P.C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., and Guagnard, G.A., 1995, Values, Beliefs, and Pro-environmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emerging Attitude Objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611-1636 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x
  24. Thogerson, J., 1997, Value and Attitude Formation Towards Emerging Attitude Objects: From Recycling to General Waste Minimizing Behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 182-189
  25. Thompson, M.M. and Zanna, M.P., 1995, The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63, 259-268 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00810.x