생명과학회지 (Journal of Life Science)

  • 제17권1호
  • /
  • Pages.39-44
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-9918(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3406(eISSN)
한국생명과학회 (Korean Society of Life Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

분열형 효모인 Schizosaccharomyces pombe 로부터 rqh1 돌연변이의 DNA damaging agent sensitivity를 보상하는 유전자의 특성 연구

Isolation and Characterization of DNA Damaging Agent Sensitivity of rqh1 mutant from Schizosaccharomyce pombe

  • Lee, In-Hye (Department of Biological Science, College of Medical Life Science, Silla University) ;
  • Choi, In-Soon (Department of Biological Science, College of Medical Life Science, Silla University)
  • 발행 : 2007.01.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

분열형 효모에서 Rqh1은 Top3과 함께 vegetative growth에 필수적이다. $rqh^-$ 돌연변이는 DNA damaging agent에 민감성을 보이는데 이때, 부적절한 유전자 발현, 세포 신장, 염색체의 불안전성, 비정상적인 다중격막, 발아의 결핍을 포함한 넓은 범위의 표현형을 보인다. rqh1-overexpression cell 역시 rqh1 deletion mutant에서 보이는 DNA damaging agent 민감성을 관찰할 수 있다. 논문은 nmtl promoter를 가지는 PREP vector에 Rqhl이 과발현 할 때 나타나는 DNA damaging agent 민감성를 보상하는 유전자를 찾아 $rqh1^+$의 기능을 알아보는 것이다. 여기서 보상능이 보이는 rqh156, rqh172 두 개의 돌연변이를 골라냈다. rqhl deletion mutant의 DNA damaging agent 민감성은 rqh156, rqh172의 발현에 의해 보상 되어지는 것을 확인하였다.

The Rqh1 gene is essential for vegetative growth in fission Yeast. The rqh1 mutant showed that sensitivity of DNA damaging agent, a wild range of phenotype including abnormal gene expression and cell elongation. This result showed that the rqhl-overexpression cell was sensitivity to DNA damaging agent like rqhl mutant. When Rqh1 have an over-expression by $nmt1^+$ promoter of pREP vector, rqh1 mutant DNA damaging agent sensitivity could be compensated. We isolated two strong mutant containing complementation gene, rqh156 and rqh172, respectively. This result observed that the DNA damaging agent sensitivity of rqhl mutant was complemented by the expression of rqh156 and rqh172. They induced mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner HU, MMS and UV. The HU sensitivity of the rqhl was complemented by the expression of rqh156 and rqh172. The mRNA expression of rqh156 decreased on HU dose dependent but the mRNA expression of rqh172 did not decrease on HU dose dependent. The MMS and W sensitivity of the rqhl was complemented by the expression of rqh156 and rqh172. These results indicate that the isolated rqhl gene may play an important role in DNA metabolism.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bachrati, C. Z, and I. D. Hickson. 2003. RecQ helicases: suppressors of tumorigenesis and premature aging. Biochem. J. 374, 577-606 https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20030491
  2. Bennett, R. J., J. A. Sharp and J. C. Wang. 1998. Purification and characterization of the Sgs1 DNA helicase activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9644-9650 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.16.9644
  3. Bjergbaek, L., J. A. Cobb and S. M. Gasser. 2002. RecQ helicases and genome stability: lessons from model organisms and human disease. SWISS MED WKLY 132, 433¬442
  4. Chakraverty, R. K. and I. D. Hickson. 1999. Defending genome integrity during DNA replication: a proposed role for RecQ family helicases, BioEssays 21, 286-294 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199904)21:4<286::AID-BIES4>3.0.CO;2-Z
  5. Caspari, T., J. M. Murray and A. M. Carr. 2002. Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. Genes Dev. 16, 1195-1208 https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.221402
  6. Claudette, L. D., J. Dixon,O. Fekret and C. W. Matthew. 2000. Partial suppression of the fission yeast $rqh1^{-}$ phenotype by expression of bacterial Holliday junction resolvase, EMBO J. 19, 2751-2762 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.11.2751
  7. Courcelle, J. and P. Hanawalt. 1999. RecQ and RecJ process blocked replication forks prior to the resumption of replication in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262, 543-551 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380051116
  8. Cox, M. M. 2001 Historical overview: searching for replication help in all of the rec places. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8173-8180 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.131004998
  9. Ellis, N. A., J. Groden, T. Z., J. Straughen, D. J. Lennon, M. Proytcheva and J. Jerman. 1995. The Bloom's syndrome gene product is homologous to RecQ helicases, Cell 83, 655-666 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90105-1
  10. Enoch, T. and P. Nurse. 1990. Mutation of fission yeast cell cycle control genes abolishes dependence of mitosis on DNA replication. Cell 60, 665-673 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90669-6
  11. Fouzia, A. and E. Stewart. 2005. The N-terminal region of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe RecQ helicase, Rqh1p, physically interacts with Topoisomerase III and is required for Rqh1p function. Mol Gen Genomics 273, 102-114 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-005-1111-3
  12. Gangloff, S., J. P. McDonald, C. Bendixen, L. Arthur and R. Rothstein. 1994 The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8391-8398 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.14.12.8391
  13. Goodwin, A., S. W. Wang, T. Toda, C. Norbury and I. D. Hickson. 1999. Topoisomerase III is essential for accurate nuclear division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res 27, 4050-4058 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.20.4050
  14. Hanada, K, T. Ukita, Y. Kohno, K. Saito, J. Kato and H. Ikeda. 1997. RecQ DNA helicase is a suppressor of illegitimate recombination in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 3860-3865 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.8.3860
  15. Karow, J. K., L. Wu and I .D. Hickson. 2000. RecQ family helicases: roles in cancer and aging. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 10, 32-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-437X(99)00039-8
  16. Kitao, S., A.. Shimamoto, M. Goto, R. W. Miller, W. A. Smithson, N. M. Lindor and Y. Furuichi. 1999. Mutations in RECQL4 cause a subset of cases of Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. Nature Genet., 22, 82-84 https://doi.org/10.1038/8788
  17. Michael M. 2001. Recombinational DNA repair of damaged replication forks in Escherichia coli: questions, Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 53-82 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090016
  18. Miki, J., J. Steven and S. Brill. 2005. Roles of SGS1, MUS81, and RAD51 in the repair of lagging-strand replication defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48, 213-225 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-005-0014-5
  19. Mohaghegh, P. and I. D. Hickson. 2001. DNA helicase deficiencies associated with cancer predisposition and premature aging disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 741-746 https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.7.741
  20. Murray, J. M., H. D. Lindsay, C. A. Munday and A. M. Carr. 1997. Role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe RecQ homolog, recombination, and checkpoint genes in UV damage tolerance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6868-6875 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.17.12.6868
  21. O, MS, I. S. Choi and S. D. Park. 2002. Topoisomerase III is required for accurate DNA replication and chromosome segregation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res 18, 1-10
  22. Puranam, K. L. and P. J. Blackshear. 1994. Cloning and characterisation of RECQL, a potential human homologue of the Escherichia coli DNA helicase RecQ. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29838-29845
  23. Sambrook, J. and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor
  24. Stewart, E., C. R. Chapman, F. Al-Khodairy, A. M. Carr and T. Enoch. 1997. $Rqh1^+$, a fission yeast gene related to the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for reversible S phase arrest. EMBO J. 16, 2682-2692 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.10.2682
  25. Ui, A, Y. Satoh, F. Onoda, A. Miyajima, M. Seki and T. Enomoto. 2001. The N-terminal region of Sgs1, which interacts with Top3, is required for complementation of MMS sensitivity and suppression of hyper- recombination in sgs1 disruptants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 265, 837-850 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380100479
  26. Wallis, J. W., G. Chrebet, G . Brodsky, M. Rolfe and R. Rothstein. 1989. A hyper-recombination mutation in S. cerevisiae identifies a novel eukaryotic topoisomerase. Cell 58, 409-19 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90855-6
  27. Watt, P. M., E. J. Louis, R. H. Borts and I. D. Hickson. 1995. Sgs1: a eukaryotic homolog of E. coli RecQ that interacts with topoisomerase II in vivo and is required for faithful chromosome segregation. Cell 81, 253-260 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90335-6
  28. Wu, L., and I. D. Hickson. 2002. RecQ helicases and cellular responses to DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 509, 35-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(02)00225-7
  29. Yamagata, K., J. Kato, A. Shimamoto, M. Goto,M, Y. Furuichi and H. Ikeda. 1998. Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes suppress hyperrecombination in yeast sgs1 mutant: implication for genomic instability in human diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 8733-8738 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.15.8733