Microcosm Study for Revegetation of Barren Land with Wild Plants by Some Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria

  • Ahn, Tae-Seok (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ka, Jong-Ok (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Geon-Hyoung (Department of Biological Science, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Song, Hong-Gyu (Division of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Published : 2007.01.31

Abstract

Growth promotion of wild plants by some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) was examined in the microcosms composed of soils collected separately from a grass-covered site and a nongrass-covered site in a lakeside barren area at Lake Paro, Korea. After sowing the seeds of eight kinds of wild plants and inoculation of several strains of PGPR, the total bacterial number and microbial activity were measured during 5 months of study period, and the plant biomasses grown were compared at the end of the study. Acridine orange direct counts in the inoculated microcosms, $1.3-9.8{\times}10^9\;cells{\cdot}g\;soil^{-1}$ in the soil from the grass-covered area and $0.9-7.2{\times}10^9\;cells{\cdot}g\;soil^{-1}$ in the soil from the nongrass-covered site, were almost twice higher than those in the uninoculated microcosms. The number of Pseudomonas sp., well-known bacteria as PGPR, and the soil dehydrogenase activity were also higher in the inoculated soils than the uninoculated soils. The first germination of sowed seeds in the inoculated microcosm was 5 days earlier than the uninoculated microcosm. Average lengths of all plants grown during the study period were 26% and 29% longer in the inoculated microcosms starting with the grass-covered soil and the nongrass-covered soil, respectively, compared with those in the uninoculated microcosms. Dry weights of whole plants grown were 67-82% higher in the inoculated microcosms than the uninoculated microcosms. Microbial population and activity and growth promoting effect by PGPR were all higher in the soils collected from the grass-covered area than in the nongrass-covered area. The growth enhancement of wild plants seemed to occur by the activities of inoculated microorganisms, and this capability of PGPR may be utilized for rapid revegetation of some barren lands.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, T., H. Song, and J. Park. 2004. Rehabilitation of naked shoreline of lakes and reservoirs. Report No. 1403013-1-1. Korea Institute of Environmental Science and Technology
  2. Ball, D. F. 1964. Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soil. J. Soil Sci. 15: 84-92 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1964.tb00247.x
  3. Bashan, Y. 1998. Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 16: 729- 770 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(98)00003-2
  4. Bertland, H., R. Nalin, R. Bally, and J.-C. Cleyet-Marel. 2001. Isolation and identification of the most efficient plant growth promoting bacteria associated with canola (Brassica napus). Biol. Fertil. Soils 33: 152-156 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000305
  5. Bloemberg, G. and B. Lugtenberg. 2001. Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 343-350 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00183-7
  6. Cakmakci, R., F. Donmez, A. Aydin, and F. Sahin. 2006. Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38: 1482-1487 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.019
  7. Chanway, C. P. 1997. Inoculation of tree roots with plant growth promoting soil bacteria: An emerging technology for reforestation. For. Sci. 43: 99-112
  8. Compant, S., B. Duffy, J. Nowak, C. Clement, and E. Ait Barka. 2005. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 4951-4959 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
  9. Dey, R., K. Pal, D. Bhatt, and S. Chauhan. 2004. Growth promotion and yield enhancement of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol. Res. 159: 371-394 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2004.08.004
  10. Gamalero, E., L. Fracchia, M. Cavaletto, J. Garbaye, P. Frey- Klett, G. Varese, and M. Martinotti. 2003. Characterization of functional traits of two fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from basidiomes of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35: 55-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00236-5
  11. Gerhardson, B. and S. Wright. 2002. Bacterial associations with plants: Beneficial, non N-fixing interactions, pp. 79- 103. In: K. Sivasithamparam, K. Dixon, and R. Narrett (eds.), Microorganism in Plant Conservation and Biodiversity. Kluwer Academic Press, London, UK
  12. Hu, H. B., Y. Q. Xu, F. Chen, X. H. Zhang, and B. K. Hur. 2005. Isolation and characterization of a new fluorescent Pseudomonas strain that produces both phenazine 1- carboxylic acid and pyoluteorin. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15: 86-90
  13. Huang, X.-D., Y. El-Alawi, D. Penrose, B. Glick, and B. Greenberg. 2004. Responses of grass species to creosote during phytoremediation. Environ. Poll. 130: 453-463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2003.12.018
  14. Jeon, J.-S., S.-S. Lee, H.-Y. Kim, T.-S. Ahn, and H.-G. Song. 2003. Plant growth promotion in soil by some inoculated microorganisms. J. Microbiol. 41: 271-276
  15. Katiyar, V. and R. Goel. 2004. Improved plant growth from seed bacterization using siderophore overproducing cold resistant mutant of Pseudomonas fluorescens. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 653-657
  16. Kim, J., E. Kim, Y. Kang, O. Choi, C. S. Park, and I. Hwang. 2006. Molecular characterization of biosynthetic genes of an antifungal compound produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens MC07. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15: 450-456
  17. Kokalis-Burelle, N., J. Kloepper, and M. Reddy. 2006. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as transplant amendments and their effects on indigenous rhizosphere microorganisms. Appl. Soil Ecol. 31: 91-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.03.007
  18. Lucas Garcia, J., J. Domenech, C. Santamaria, M. Camacho, A. Daza, and F. Gutierrez-Manero. 2004. Growth of forest plants (pine and holm-oak) inoculated with rhizobacteria: Relationship with microbial community structure and biological activity of its rhizosphere. Environ. Exp. Botany 52: 239- 251 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.003
  19. Lucy, M., E. Reed, and B. Glick. 2004 Application of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 86: 1-25 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANTO.0000024903.10757.6e
  20. Misko, A. and J. Germida. 2002. Taxonomic and functional diversity of pseudomonads isolated from the roots of fieldgrown canola. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 42: 399-407 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb01029.x
  21. Nautiyal, S., S. Mehta, and H. Singh. 2006. Biological control and plant-growth promotion by Bacillus strains from milk. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16: 184-192
  22. Prosser, J. I. 1997. Microbial processes within the soil, pp. 183-213. In J. van Elsas, J. Trevors, and E. Wellington (eds.), Modern Soil Microbiology. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
  23. Ryu, C.-M., C.-H. Hu, R. Locy, and J. Kloepper. 2005. Study of mechanisms for plant growth promotion elicited by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil 268: 285- 292 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-0301-9
  24. Shishido, M. and C. Chanway. 1998. Forest soil community responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and spruce seedlings. Biol. Fertil. Soils 26: 179-186 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050365
  25. Stotzky, G. and R. Burns. 1982. The soil environment: Clayhumus- microbe interactions, pp. 105-133. In R. Burns and J. Slater (eds.), Experimental Microbial Ecology. Blackwell Sci. Pub., London, UK
  26. Strigul, N. and L. Kravchenko. 2006. Mathematical modeling of PGPR inoculation into the rhizosphere. Environ. Model Softw. 21: 1158-1171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.06.003
  27. Vessey, J. K. 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255: 571-586 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
  28. Woo, B. and K. Kim. 1997. Studies on the selection of standard revegetation measures on the highway cut-slopes. J. Kor. For. Soc. 86: 476-488
  29. Yeom, J.-R. and C.-S. Park. 1995. Enhancement of plant growth and suppression of damping-off of cucumber by low temperature growing Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates. Kor. J. Plant Pathol. 11: 252-257