The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

EFFECT OF SURFACE TREATMENT METHODS ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN CEMENT TO ZIRCONIA CERAMIC

  • Lee, Ho-Jeong (Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University School of Medicine) ;
  • Sub, Kyu-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. The aims of the study were to evaluate the effect of current surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of a resin composite luting cement bonded to ceramic surfaces and to identify the optimum cement type. Material and methods. The sixty zirconia ceramic specimens(10 per group) with EVEREST milling machine and 60 tooth block were made. The zirconia ceramic surface was divided into two groups according to surface treatment: (1) airborne abrasion with $110{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide particles; (2) Rocatec system, tribochemical silica coating. The zirconia ceramic specimens were cemented to tooth block using resin cements. The tested resin cements were Rely X ARC, Panavia F and Superbond C&B. Each specimen was mount in a jig of the universal testing machine for shear strength. The results were subjected to 2-way ANOVA and Post hoc tests was performed using Tukey, Scheffe, and Bonferroni test. Results. The mean value of shear bond strength(MPa) were as follows: $$RelyXARC(+Al_2O_3),5.35{\pm}1.69$$; $$RelyXARC(+Rocatec),8.50{\pm}2.13$$; $$PanaviaF(+Al_2O_3),9.58{\pm}1.13$$; $$PanaviaF(+Rocatec),12.98{\pm}1.71$$; $$SuperbondC&B(+Al_2O_3)8.27{\pm}2.04$$; $$SuperbondC&B(+Rocatec),14.46{\pm}2.39$$. There was a significant increase in the shear bond strength when the ceramic surface was subjected to the tribochemical treatment(Rocatec 3M) in all cement groups(P<0.05). Bonding strengths of cements applied to samples treated with $Al_2O_3$ were compared; Rely X ARC showed the lowest values, whereas Panavia F cement showed higher value than that of Superbond C&B group with no statistical significance. When the bond strength of cements with of Rocatec treatment was compared, Rely X ARC showed lowest values. Overall, it was apparent that tribochemical treated Super-Bond possessed higher mean bond strength (14.46MPa; P<0.05) than that of Panavia F cement group with no significance. Conclusions. Silica coating followed silanization(Rocatec treatment) increase the bond strength between resin cement and zirconia ceramic. Panavia F containing phosphate monomer and Superbond C&B comprised of 4-META tend to bond chemically with zirconia ceramic, thus demonstrating higher bond strength compared to BisGMA resin cement. Superbond C&B has shown to have highest value of bonding strength to zirconia ceramic after Rocatec treatment compared to other cement.

Keywords

References

  1. Kon M, Kawano F, Asaoka K, Matsumoto N. Effect of leucite crystals on the strength of glassy porcelain. Dent Mater 1994;13:138-47 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.13.138
  2. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:239-46
  3. Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:45-50
  4. Denry IL, Mackert Jr. JR, Holloway JA, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of cubic leucite stabilization on the flexural strength of feldspathic dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1996;75:1928-35 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750120301
  5. Mackert JR, Russell CM. Leudte crystallization during processing of a heat-pressed dental ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:261-5
  6. Mackert [r JR, Williams AL, Ergle JW, Russell CM. Water-enhanced crystallization of leucite in dental porcelain. Dent Mater 2000;16:426-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00040-3
  7. Probster L, Diehl J. Slip-casting alumina ceramics for crown and bridge restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:25-31
  8. Sadoun M, Asmussen E. Bonding of resin cements to an aluminous ceramic: a new surface treatment. Dent Mater 1994;10:185-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90030-2
  9. Andersson M, Oden A. A newall-ceramic crown a dense-sintered, high purity alumina coping with porceiain. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:59-64 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309041149
  10. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial, Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  11. Finscher J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structual reliability of alumina-, feldspath-, leucite-, micaand zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent 2000;28:529-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00030-0
  12. Pilser F, Kocher P, Weibel F, Luthy H, Scharer P, Gauckler JL. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining(DCM). Int J Com put Dent 2001;4:89-106
  13. Tinschert J, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, ziconia based three-unit fixed partial denture: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-8
  14. Sturzenegger B, Feher A, Luthy H, Schumacher M, Loeffel 0, Filser F, Kocher P, GaucklerL, Scharer P. Klinische Studie von Zirkonoxidbrucken im Seitenzalmgebiet mit dem DCMSystem. Acta Med Dent Helv 2000;5:131-9
  15. Della Bona A Anusavice KJ, Hood JA. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on tensile bond strength to a resin cement. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:248-53
  16. Della Bona A, Shen C, Anusavice KJ. Work of adhesion of resin on treated lithia disilicate-based ceramic. Dent Mater 2004;20:338-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00126-X
  17. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660091001
  18. Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of theresin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 2002;18:179-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00047-1
  19. Madani M, Chu FCS, McDonald A V, Smales RJ. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107337
  20. Kern N, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80200-8
  21. Blixt M, Adamczak E, Linden L, aden A, Arvidson K. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements, Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:221-6
  22. Awliya W, aden A, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:9-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/000163598422992
  23. Ozcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of the surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:335-9
  24. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:139-47
  25. Barghi N. To silanate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:659-62,664
  26. Kern N, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80200-8
  27. Blixt M, Adamczak E, Linden L, aden A, Arvidson K. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:221-6
  28. Awliya W, aden A, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:9-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/000163598422992
  29. Do M, Sjoren G, Sundh A, Watari F, Bergman M, Lerner U. Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:487-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00094-5
  30. Burrow MF, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dent Mater 1994;10: 241-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90068-X
  31. Saho H Shono T, Sonoda H,Ciucchi B, Carvalho R et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;1:299-309
  32. Bin Yang, Klaus Ludwig, Rainer Adelung et al. Microtensile bond strength of three luting resins to human reginal dentin. Dent Mater 2006;22:45-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.009
  33. Denes Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-6 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091401
  34. Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:551-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011
  35. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconiumbased ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:60-5
  36. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00011-6
  37. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium oxide after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:356-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.001
  38. Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:131-5
  39. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhesive Dent 2000:2: 139-147
  40. Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2005;21:1158-1162 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.005
  41. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF i Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic.The effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021
  42. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  43. Luthy H, Loeffel O. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;22:195-200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.016
  44. Kim BK, Bae EK, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:357-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.012