The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

THE EFFECT OF MONOMER TO POWDER RATIO ON POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE-STRAIN KINETICS OF POLYMER-BASED PROVISIONAL CROWN AND FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE MATERIALS

  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. Although a number of previous investigations have been carried out on the polymerization shrinkage-strain kinetics of provisional crown and fixed partial denture (FPD) materials, the effect of the changes of liquid monomer to powder ratio on its polymerization shrinkage-strain kinetics has not been reported. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of liquid monomer to powder ratio of polymer-based provisional crown and FPD materials on the polymerization shrinkage-strain kinetics. Material and methods. Chemically activated acrylic provisional materials (Alike, Jet, Snap) were investigated. Each material was mixed with different liquid monomer to powder ratios by volume (1.0:3.0, 1.0:2.5, 1.0:2.0, 1.0:1.5, 1.0:1.0). Time dependent polymerization shrinkage- strain kinetics of all materials was measured by the bonded-disk method as a function of time at $23^{\circ}C$. Five recordings were taken for each ratio. The results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the multiple comparison Scheffe test at the significance level of 0.05. Trends were also examined by linear regression. Results. At 5 minutes after mixing, the polymerization shrinkage-strains of all materials ranged from only 0.01% to 0.49%. At 10 minutes, the shrinkage-strain of Alike was the highest, 3.45% (liquid monomer to powder ratio=1.0:3.0). Jet and Snap were 2.69% (1.0:2.0) and 1.58% (1.0:3.0), respectively (P>0.05). Most shrinkage (94.3%-96.5%) occurred at 30 minutes after mixing for liquid monomer to powder ratio, ranging from 1.0:3.0 to 1.0:1.0. The highest polymerization shrinkage-strain values were observed for the liquid monomer to powder ratio of 1.0:3.0. At 120 minutes after mixing, the shrinkage-strain values were 4.67%, 4.18%, and 3.07% for Jet, Alike, and Snap, respectively. As the liquid monomer to powder ratio increased, the shrinkage-strain values tend to be decreased linearly (r=-0.769 for Alike, -0.717 for Jet, -0.435 for Snap, $r^2=0.592$ for Alike, 0.515 for Jet, 0.189 for Snap; P<0.05). Conclusion. The increase of the liquid monomer to powder ratio from 1.0:3.0 to 1.0:1.0 had a significant effect on the shrinkage-strain kinetics of polymer-based crown and FPD materials investigated. This increased the working time and decreased the shrinkage-strain during polymerization.

Keywords

References

  1. Goldberg PV, Hingginbottom FL, Wilson TG. Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy. Periodontoloy 2000;25:100-9
  2. Kim SH, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkagestrain kinetics of temporary crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater 2004;20:88-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00101-5
  3. Gibert JL, Hasenwinkel JM, Wixson RL, Lautenschlager EP. A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinakge of bone cement: A potential major source of porosity. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:210-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:1<210::AID-JBM27>3.0.CO;2-R
  4. Malone WFP, Koth DL. Tylman' s theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics, 8th ed. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica Company; 1989. p.255-71
  5. Vallittu P. Effect of powder-to-liquid on the distortion of repaired denture acrylic resin. Eur J Pros Rest Dent 1996;4:83-6
  6. Silikas N, Al-Kheraif A, Watts DC. Influence of P IL ratio and peroxide I amine concentrations on shrinkage-strain kinetics during setting of PMMA/MMA biomaterial formulations. Biomater 2005;26:197-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.028
  7. Gilmore N, Sheiham A. Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1971;42:8-12 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1971.42.1.8
  8. Highfield JE, Powell RN. Effects of removal of posterior overhanging metallic margins of restorations upon the periodontal tissues. J Clin Periodontol 1978;5:169-81 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1978.tb02277.x
  9. Jeffcoat MK, Howell TH. Alveolar bone destruction due to overhanging amalgam in periodontal disease. J PeriodontoI 1980;51:599-602 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1980.51.10.599
  10. Turner CH. A retrospective study of the fit of jacket crowns placed around gold posts and cores, and the associated gingival health. J Oral Rehabil 1982;9:427-34 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb01032.x
  11. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Oinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin PeriodontoI 1983;10:563-78 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x
  12. Sorensen SE, Larsen m, Jorgensen KD. Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins. Scand J Dent Res 1986;94:109-14
  13. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:357-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90225-L
  14. Watts DC, Cash AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development. Dent Mater 1991;7:281-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80030-2
  15. Watts DC, Marouf A. Optical specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strai measurements on lightcured biomaterials. Dent Mater 2000;16:447-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00043-9
  16. Turner RC, Atkins PE, Ackley MA, Park JB. Molecular and macroscopic properties of PMMA bone cement: Free-radical generation and temperature change versus mixing ratio. J Biomed Mater Res 1981;15:425-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820150312
  17. Pascual B, Gurruchaga M, Ginebra MP, Gil FJ, Planell JA, Goni I. Influence of the modification of P/L ratio on a new formulation of acrylic bone cement. Biomater 1999;20:465-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00192-6
  18. BeIkoff SM, Sanders JC, Jasper LE. The effect of the monomer-to powder ratio on the materials properties of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:396-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10258
  19. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;38:155-82 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2<155::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-C
  20. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K Clinical and microbial effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin PeriodontoI 1983;10:563-78 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x
  21. Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD. Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:492-8 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.110262
  22. Rose E, Lal J, Green R. Effects of peroxide, amine and hydroquinone in varying concentrations on the polymerization rate of polymethyl methacrylate slurries. J Am Dent Assoc 1958;56:375-81 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1958.0065