대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제45권4호
  • /
  • Pages.407-418
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

불산 식각 농도 및 시간이 lithium disilicate 도재와 레진시멘트의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

EFFECTS OF HYDROFLUORIC ACID CONCENTRATION & ETCHING TIME ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN LITHIUM DISILICATE CERAMIC AND RESIN CEMENT

  • 서재민 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박찬운 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 안승근 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Seo, Jae-Min (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Charn-Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydrofluoric acid concentration & etching time on the shear bond strength between IPS Empress 2 ceramic and resin cement. Material and methods: Thirty three rectangular shape ceramic specimens($20{\times}12{\times}5mm$ size, IPS Empress 2 core materials) were used for this study. The ceramic specimens divided into ten experimental groups with three specimens in each group and were etched with hydrofluoric acid(4%, 9%) according to different etching times(30s, 60s, 90s, 120s, 180s). Etched surfaces of ceramic specimens were bonded with resin cement(Rely X Unicorn) using acrylic glass tube. All cemented specimens were tested under shear loading until fracture on universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min and the maximum load at fracture(kg) was recorded. Collected shear bond strength data were analyzed with one way ANOVA and Duncan tests. All etched ceramic surfaces were examined morphologically using SEM(scanning electron microscopy). Results: Shear bond strength of etching group$(35.89{\sim}68.01MPa)$ had four to seven times greater than no-etching group$(9.53{\pm}2.29MPa)$. The ceramic specimen etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 60s showed the maximum shear bond strength$(68.01{\pm}11.78MPa)$. Ceramic surface etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 60s showed most retentive surface texture. Conclusion: It is considered that 60s etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid is optimal etching methods for IPS Empress 2 ceramic bonding.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Seiber C. In the light of nature. Quintessence Dent Technol 1993: 16: 60-8
  2. Christensen JC. Porcelain-fused-to-metal vs. nonmetal crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 1999:130:409-11 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0211
  3. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992:5:9-16
  4. Mackert JR, Russell CM. Leucite crystallization during processing of a heat-pressed dental ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1996:9:261-5
  5. Holand W, Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000:53:297-303 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<297::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-G
  6. Beham G. IPS Empress. A new ceramic technology. Ivoclar Vivadent Report 1990:6:1-13
  7. Holand W. Materials science fundamentals of the IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramic. I voclar Vivadent Report 1998:12:3-10
  8. Schweiger M, Holand W, Frank M. IPS Empress 2: A new pressable high strength glass-ceramic for esthetic all-ceramic restorations. Quintessence Dent Technol 1999:22:143-51
  9. Severance G. Introducing a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic: IPS Empress 2. Signature 1999:4:1-3
  10. Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT. Research evaluations of a lithium disilicated restorative system: IPS Empress 2. Signature 1999:4:4-10
  11. Grossman DG, Nelson JW. The bonded Dicor crown [abstract]. J Dent Res 1987:66:206
  12. Groten M, Probster L. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999:10: 169-77
  13. Eden GT, Kacicz JM. Dicor crown strength improvement due to bonding (abstract). J Dent Res 1987:66:207
  14. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJM, Longmate J. Effect of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995:74:381-7 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011501
  15. Thurmound JW, Barkmeier WW, Willwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994:72:355-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3
  16. Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement. J Prosthet Dent 1994:72:85-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90216-X
  17. Stewart GD, Jain P, Hodges J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2002:88:277-84 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128034
  18. Anonymons. Empress 2 Instruction for use. Ivoclar-Vivadent AG 2003
  19. Hofmann N, Handrejk A, Haller B, Klaiber B. The surface conditioning of pressed ceramics and its effect on the bond strength to composites [abstract]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1993:103:1415-20
  20. Spohr AM, Sobrinho LC, Consan S, Sinhoreti MAC, KnowLes JC. Influence of surface conditions and silane agent on the bond of resin to IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:277-82
  21. Yang TJ, Lim JH, Cho IH. A study of tensile bond strength according to varied treatment methods of non precious metal surface and resin cements. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1996;34:335-48
  22. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1983:62:297
  23. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987:66:1460-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660091001
  24. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss. morphology. and changes in the surface composition. J Proshet Dent 1994:71:453-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-1
  25. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Proshet Dent 1988:60:288-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3
  26. Calamia JR, Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK, Hirsch SM. Shear bond strength of etched porcelain [abstract]. J Dent Res 1985:64:296
  27. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:17-23
  28. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent 1998:26: 53-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00078-4