Clinical and Radiologic Assessment for Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion with Synthetic Cages

  • Shin, Seung-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School/Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Jong (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School/Hospital) ;
  • Eun, Jong-Pil (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School/Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Ha-Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School/Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Chung (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School/Hospital)
  • 발행 : 2007.02.28

초록

Objective : This purpose of this study was to determine the clinical efficiency and applicability, and to analyze the radiologic findings of the anterior cervical approach using two synthetic cages for interbody fusion. Methods : A total of 41 patients with cervical diseases underwent anterior discectomy and interbody fusion with the PEEK $Solis^{TM}$ cage in 21 patients and the carbon composite $Osta-Pek^{TM}$ cage in 20 patients. Outcome assessment was done using Odom's criteria. Radiological assessment was performed with respect to subsidence, bony fusion and lordosis. The mean follow-up period was 13 months. Results : There were 34 [92.9%] successful cases. The average height of the disc space 12 months after surgery compared the height just after surgery was decreased over 3mm in 4 cases, indicating severe subsidence. The use of these synthetic cages have provided the increase in postoperative cervical lordosis. Conclusion : There were no significant differences between the $Solis^{TM}$ and $Osta-Pek^{TM}$ cages on clinical and radiologic outcomes. Both $Solis^{TM}$ and $Osta-Pek^{TM}$ cages showed low subsidences and complications associated with hardware with good clinical outcomes, high fusion rates, restored disc heights, and restored cervical lordosis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D : Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Indications, techniques, and results. Spine 16 : 38-45, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103001-00008
  2. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS : Iliac crest bone graft harvest site donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20 : 1055-1060, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
  3. Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA : Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 17 : 427-430, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199210001-00014
  4. Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM : Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25 : 491-502, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198910000-00001
  5. Cho IS, Seo DH, Park SC, Chae EB, Choi SW, Song KY, et al : Analysis of radiologic factors affecting longterm surgical results of anterior cervical fusion patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 30 : 194-200, 2001
  6. Cloward RB : The anterior approach for the removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15 : 602-614, 1958 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602
  7. Connolly PJ, Esses SI, Kostuik JP : Anterior cervical fusion : outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates. J Spinal Disord 9 : 202-206, 1996
  8. Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D : Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion : warning. Eur Spine J 12 : 513-516, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6
  9. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM : Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 11 : 521-524, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198607000-00003
  10. Hadley MN, Sonntag VK : Cervical disc herniations. The anterior approach to symptomatic interspace pathology. Neurosurg Clin N Am 4 : 45-52, 1993
  11. Han KW, Kim JS, Kim KH, Cho YW, Lee IC, Bae SD : Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the carbon composite Osta-Pek frame cage in degenerative cervical diseases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 37 : 422-426, 2005
  12. Kaufman HH, Jones E : The principles of bony spinal fusion. Neurosur-gery 24 : 264-270, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198902000-00018
  13. Kim MS, Kim SH, Kim SW, Chang CH, Cho SH, Bae JH : Anterior cervical interbody fusion with carbon-composite cages and local autobone for cervical disc disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 34 : 115-118, 2003
  14. Kim S, Kim TS, Koh JS, Lim YJ, Kim GK, Rhee BA : Anterior cervical bisegmented interbody fusion with titanium cage (RABEA) in degenerative cervical disease : comparative analysis with monosegmental interbody fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 34 : 440-444, 2003
  15. Kim SH, Kim SD, Kim SH, Park JY, Lim DJ, Cho TH : Clinical experience with Solis cage for anterior cervical interbody fusion in degenerative cervical diseases : a preliminary report. Korean J Spine 1 : 192-200, 2004
  16. Lane JM, Sandhu HS : Current approaches to experimental bone grafting. Orthop Clin Nor Am 18 : 213-225, 1987
  17. Lozes G, Fawaz A, Cama A, Krivosic I, Devos P, Herlant M, et al : Discectomies of the lower cervical spine using interbody biopolymer (B.O.P.) implants. Advantages in the treatment of complicated cervical arthrosis. A review of 150 cases. Acta Neurochir(Wien) 96 : 88-93, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01456164
  18. Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT : Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating. Spine 24 : 1604-1610, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908010-00016
  19. Martin GJ Jr, Haid RW Jr, MacMillan M, Rodts GE Jr, Berkman R : Anterior cervical discectomy with freeze-dried fibula allograft. Overview of 317 cases and literature review. Spine 24 : 852-859, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905010-00004
  20. Matge G, Leclercq TA : Rationale for interbody fusion with threaded titanium cages at cervical and lumbar levels. Results on 357 cases. Acta Neurochir 142 : 425-433, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050453
  21. Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B : Cervial disc lesions. JAMA 166 : 23-28, 1958 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1958.02990010025006
  22. Profeta G, de Falco R, Ianniciello G, Profeta L, Cigliano A, Raja AI : Preliminary experience with anterior cervical microdiscectomy and inter-body titanium cage fusion (Novus CT-Ti) in patients with cervical disc disease. Surg Neurol 53 : 417-426, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(00)00207-X
  23. Riley LH Jr, Robinson RA, Johnson KA, Walker AE : The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. Review of ninety-three consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 30 : 127-133, 1969 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1969.30.2.0127
  24. Rosenorn J, Hansen EB, Rosenorn M : Anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion. A prospective study. J Neurosurg 59 : 252-255, 1983 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.2.0252
  25. Shad A, Leach JC, Teddy PJ, Cadoux-Hudson TA : Use of the Solis cage and local autologous bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion : early technical experience. J Neurosurg (Spine) 2 : 116-122, 2005 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2005.2.2.0116
  26. Smith GW, Robinson RA : The treatment of certain cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40 : 607-624, 1958 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009
  27. Thalgott JS, Fritts M, Giuffre JM, Timlin M : Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with coralline hydroxyapatite. Spine 24 : 1295-1299, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907010-00005
  28. Wenz LM, Merritt K, Brown SA, Moet A, Steffee AD : In vitro biocom-patibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res 24 : 207-215, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820240207
  29. Zdeblick TA, Ghanayem AJ, Rapoff AJ, Swain C, Bassett T, Cooke ME, et al : Cervical interbody fusion cages. An animal model with and without bone morphogenetic protein. Spine 23 : 758-766, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199804010-00002