Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REMOVAL EFFECT ON ARTIFICIAL PLAQUE FROM RBM TREATED IMPLANT

RBM 처리된 임플란트 표면의 인공치태 제거 효과 연구

  • Park, Jae-Wan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Shet, Uttom Kumar (2nd stage of Brain Korea 21, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Choong-Ho (2nd stage of Brain Korea 21, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Hong, Suk-Jin (2nd stage of Brain Korea 21, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (2nd stage of Brain Korea 21, Chonnam National University)
  • 박재완 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 국민석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 박홍주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • ;
  • 최충호 (전남대학교, 2단계 BK 21) ;
  • 홍석진 (전남대학교, 2단계 BK 21) ;
  • 오희균 (전남대학교, 2단계 BK 21)
  • Published : 2007.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to evaluate the removal effect on artificial plaque from RBM treated implant surfaces that are exposed due to peri-implantitis. Materials and methods: Artificial plaque with Streptococcus mutans and acquired pellicle adhered to RBM treated implant discs. Study materials divided into one control and six test groups. In test groups, physical and chemical methods used to remove plaques. Prophyflex, Professional Mechanical Tooth Cleaning (PMTC) and interdental brush as mechanical treatments and 0.1% Chlorhexidine, Citric acid, HCl tetracycline as a chemical treatment were used. To analyses the study, disc weight was measured for remaining plaque quantities and SEM(Scanning Electronic Microscope) findings was taken for evaluation of surfaces. Results: 1. In weight changes, there was significant difference between each treatment group and the control group (p<0.05). Therefore all treatment methods using this study have good ability for remove plaques. 2. In weight changes, there was no significant difference between mechanical and chemical group, and there were no significant differences between each groups (p>0.05). 3. SEM findings after mechanical treatment disclosed as follows; Prophyflex group looked like sound implant surface, and there were some paste on implant surface at PMTC group, and there were some artificial plaque at interdental brush group. 4. SEM findings after chemical treatment disclosed as follows; there were some dark lesions which were supposed as the product from Streptococcus mutans at Chlorhexidine, Citric acid and HCl tetracycline groups. Conclusion: All six methods using in this study have good ability to remove artificial plaque on RBM treated implant. According to SEM findings, prophyflex is a superior method for removing of dental plaque among test groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Finger lM, Guerra IR : Prosthetic consideration reconstructive implantology. Dent North Am 30 : 69, 1986
  2. Zarb GA, Schmitt A : The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study : part I, surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 63 : 451, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90237-7
  3. Meffert RM,Langer B, Fritz ME : Dental implant : A review. J Periodontol 63 : 859, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859
  4. Hobo S,Ichida E, Garcia LT : Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. Quintessence Publishing Co, 1989
  5. Albreksson T,Zarb G,Worthinton P et al : The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and prognosis criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1 : 11, 1986
  6. Lavelle CL : Mucosal seal around end osseous dental implants. Oral Implantol 9 : 357, 1981
  7. Silverstein LH, Garg A, Callan D et al : The key to success : maintaining the long-term health of implants. Dent Today 17 : 104, 1998
  8. Silverstein LH, Kurtzman GM : Oral hygiene and maintenance of dental implants. Dent Today 25 : 70, 2006
  9. Lindhe J,Berglundh T,Ericsson I et al : Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. Clin Oral Impl Res 3 : 9, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030102.x
  10. Lang NP,Bragger U,Walther O et al : Ligature-induced peri-implant infection in cynomolgus monkey. Clin Oral Impl Res 4 : 2, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040101.x
  11. Shou S,Holmstrup P,Keiding NE : Microbiology of ligature- induced marginal inflammation around osseointegrated implants and ankylosed teeth in cynomolgus monkeys( Macaca fascicularis). Clin Oral Impl Res 7 : 190, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070301.x
  12. Isidor E : Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 7 : 143, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x
  13. Isidor E : Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res 8 : 1, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x
  14. Gristina AG : Biomaterial-centered infection : microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 237 : 1588, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3629258
  15. Gibbons RJ, J. van Houte : Bacterial adherence in oral microbial ecology. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 29 : 19, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.29.100175.000315
  16. Nakazato G, Tsuchiya H, Sato M : In vivo plaque formation on implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 : 321, 1989
  17. Slots J, Rams TE : Microbiology of periodontal disease, In J. Slots and M. A. Taubman (ed), Contemporary oral microbiology and immunology. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, Mo 1992, p.425
  18. Bair RE,Meyer AE : Implant surface preparation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3 : 9, 1988
  19. Kiger RD, Nylund K, Feller RP : A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes. J Clin Periodontol 18 : 681, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb00109.x
  20. Axelsson P, Lindhe J : The effect of preventive programme on dental plaque. J Clin Periodontol 1 : 126, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1974.tb01248.x
  21. Dennison DK,Huerzeler MB,Quinones C et al :Contaminated implant surfaces : An in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment madalities for decontamination. Periodontol 65 : 942, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.10.942
  22. Zablotsky MH,Diedrich DL,Meffert RM : Detoxication of endotoxin-contaminated titanium and hydroxyapatitecoated surfaces utilizing various Chemotherapeutic and mechanical modalities. Implant Dent 1 : 154, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199205000-00009
  23. Rapley JW,Swan RH,Hallmon WW et al : The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 47, 1990
  24. Chairay JP,Boulekbache H,Jean A et al : Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants : A comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. J Periodontol 68 : 1215, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.12.1215
  25. Fox SC, Moriarry 1D, Kusy RP : The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments : an in vitro study. J Periodontol 61 : 485, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.485
  26. Lee SG, Lim SB, Chung CH, Kwon SH : Analysis of surface form change after performing prophylaxis procedure on implant surface using various oral hygiene instruments. J Kor Acad Periodontology 34 : 1, 2004 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2004.34.1.1
  27. Kim WY, Lee MS, Park JB, Herr Y : Scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of tetracycline-HCl on the change of implant surface microstruccture according to application time. J Kor Acad Periodontology 32 : 523, 2002 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2002.32.3.523
  28. Song WS, Kwon YH, Lee MS, Park JB, Herr Y : Scanning electron microscopic study of the effects of citric on the change of implant surface according to application time. J Kor Acad Periodontology 32 : 697, 2002 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2002.32.4.697
  29. Albrektsson T,Zarb G,Worthington P et al : The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review of proposed criteria of sucess. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1 : 11, 1986
  30. Meffert RM : The soft tissue interface in dental implantology. Int J Oral Implantol 5 : 55, 1988
  31. Lee H, Kim SG, Kim BK et al : Experiments on animals about AVANA SS-I fixture spraying hydroxyapatite powder. Dent implant 3 : 45-51, 2003
  32. Quirynen M, de Soete M, van Steenberghe D : Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Impl Res 13 : 1, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130101.x
  33. Matarasso S, Quaremba G, Coraggio F et al : Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures. Clin Oral Impl Res 7 : 64, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070108.x
  34. Bergenholz A, Olssen A : Efficacy of plaque removal using interdental brushes and waxed dental floss. Scan J Dent Res 92 : 198, 1984
  35. Shin WC, Kang SG, Kim DK : The effectiveness of maintenance care by non - surgical treatment on the periodontal disease. J Korean Acad Dent Health 25 : 109, 2001
  36. Weaks LM,Lescher NB,Barnes CM et al : Clinical evaluation of The Prophy-jet (R) as an instrument for routine removal of tooth stain and plaque. J Periodontol 55 : 486, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1984.55.8.486
  37. Homing G : Clinical use of an air-powder abrasive. Compend Contin Educ Dent 8 : 652, 1987
  38. Cooley RL,Brown FH,Lubow RM : Evaluation of airpowder abrasive prophylaxis unit. Gen Dent 38 : 24, 1990
  39. Barnes CM, Fleming LS,Muenninghoff LA : An SEM evaluation of the in-vivo effects of an air system on various implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6 : 463, 1991
  40. Parham PL, Cobb CM, French AA et al : Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: An in vitro evaluation. J Oral Implantol 15 : 78, 1989