Journal of Plant Biotechnology

The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology (한국식물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of donor plant growth condition, microspore isolation method, culture medium, and light culture on the production of embryos in microspore culture of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

고추의 소포자 배양 시 모식물의 생육조건, 소포자 나출 방법, 치상배지 및 광배양이 배의 발생에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To establish an efficient and reliable microspore culture system for pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), the effect of light intensity used for donor plant's growth, microspore isolation methods, the composition of culture medium, and culture period in light on the production of embryos were investigated. The viability of microspores taken from the plants grown under the light intensity of 10,000 lux was almost same as that from the lower (5,500 lux) light intensity, and the embryo induction and development were a bit higher when donor plants were grown under the lower light intensity. This result implies that lower light intensity does not interfere with the embryo induction and development. However, it was very difficult to prepare microspores for culture since only a small number of flower buds could be harvested from plants grown under the light intensity of 5,500 lux. Microspore isolation methods greatly affected microspores viability; that is, when microspores were isolated by blending rather than maceration, the greater number of viable microspores were easily generated (about 13 times). Among media used for microspores culture in this study, MN medium was most efficient for embryo induction and development. Total number of embryos and the number of cotyledonary embryos were highest when microspores were cultured in dark for 4 weeks, and then in light for one week. These results will be provide valuable information to set up efficient microspore culture system of hot pepper with a high frequency of embryo production, which are applicable to gene transformation and mutagenesis.

효율적이며 반복성 있는 고추의 소포자배양 시스템을 확립하기 위해 꽃봉오리로부터 소포자의 수확 시 나출 방법이 소포자 활력에 미치는 영향을 조사하는 동시에 모 식물 생육 시의 광도, 치상배지의 조성, 및 배양 광 조건이 배의 발생 및 발달에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 광도가 10,000 lux 와 5,500 lux로 각기 다른 곳에서 모식물이 생육된 경우 활력 있는 소포자의 비율은 큰 차이가 없었으며, 소포자 배의 발생이나 발달은 저광도인 5,500 lux에서 생육된 경우에 다소 높아 모 식물 생육 시의 광도가 소포자배의 발생에 미치는 영향이 크지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 5,500 lux에서 생육된 식물에서는 꽃봉오리의 수가 적어 배양에 필요한 소포자를 준비하기가 매우 어려웠다. 활력 있는 소포자의 비율은 체나 막자사발을 이용한 maceration 방법에 비해 blender를 이용하는 경우 13배 이상 높았다. 배의 발생 및 발달에 가장 좋았던 배지는 사용한 배지 중 MN배지였으며, 배양 광 조건은 암 상태에서 배양한 4주 후에 다시 광 상태로 옮겨 1주 배양하는 것이었다. 이상에서와 같은 결과들은 고추에서 형질전환이나 돌연변이 연구에 이용될 수 있을 정도로 많은 배를 생산할 수 있는 소포자 배양 시스템을 확립하는데 중요한 기초 자료가 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Afele JC, Kannenberg LW, Keats R, Sohota S, Swanson EB (1992) Increased induction of microspore embryos . following manipulation of donor plant environment and culture temperature in corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 28: 87-90 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039919
  2. Baillie AMR, Epp DJ, Hutcheson D. Keller WA (1992) In vitro culture of isolated micros pores and regeneration of plants in Brassice campestris. Plant Cell Rep 11: 234-237
  3. Barany I, Testillano PS, Mityko J, Risueno MC (2001) The switch of the microspore developmental program in Capsicum involves HSP70 expression and lesds to the production of haploid plants. Int J Dev Biol 45(S1): S39-S40
  4. Buyukalaca S, Comlekcioglu N, Abak K, Ekbic E, Kilic N (2004) Effects of silver nitrate and donor plant growing conditions of production of Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) haploid embryos via anther culture. Eur J Hort Sci 69: 206-209
  5. Chu CC, Hill RD (1988) An improved anther culture method for obtaining higher frequency of pollen embryoids in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Sci 55: 175-181 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(88)90174-4
  6. Cistue L, Soriano M, Castillo AM, Valles MP, Sanz JM, Echavarri (2006) Production of doubled haploids in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) through isolated microspore culture. Plant Cell Rep 25: 257-264 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0047-8
  7. Datta S (2001) Androgenesis in cereals. In: Bhojwani and WY Soh (eds) Current trends in the embryology of angiosperms. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 471-488
  8. Davies PA, Morton S (1998) A comparison of barley isolated micros pore and anther culture and the influence of cell culture density. Plant Cell Rep 17: 206-210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050379
  9. Dunwell JM (1976) Acomparative study of environmental and developmental factors which influence embryo induction and growth in cultured anthers of Nicotiana tabacum. Env Exp Bot 16: 109-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(76)90002-2
  10. Gland A, Lichter R, Schwelger HG (1988) Genetic and exogenous factors affecting embryogenesis in isolated micros pore cultures of Brassica napus L. J Plant Physiol 132: 613-617 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(88)80264-5
  11. Guha S, Maheshwari SC (1964) In vitro production of embryos from anthers of Datura. Nature 4957: 497
  12. Guo YD, Pulli S (2000) An efficient androgenic embryogenesis and plant regeneration method throuth isolated microspore culture in timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Plant Cell Rep 19: 761-767 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990000193
  13. Gustafson VD, Stephen Benziger P, Wriqht MS, Stroup WW, Yen Y (1995) Isolated wheat microspore culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 42: 207-213 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034239
  14. Hansen M, Svinnset K (1993) Microspore culture of swede (Brassica napus ssp. rapifera) and the effects of fresh and conditioned media. Plant Cell Rep 12: 496-500
  15. Heslop-Harrison JS (1970) Cytological techniques to assess pollen quality. In: Cresti M, Tiezzi A (eds) Sexual plant repreduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 41-48
  16. Hofer M, Touraev A, Heberle-bors E (1999) Induction of embryogenesis from isolated apple micros pores. Plant Cell Rep 18: 1012-1017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050700
  17. Hu T, Kasha KJ (1997) Improvement of isolated microspore culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through ovary co-culture. Plant Cell Rep 16: 520-525 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142316
  18. Hu TC, Ziauddin A, Simion E, Kasha KJ (1995) Isolated microspore culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a defined media I. Effects of pretreatment, isolation methods, and hormones. In vitro Cell Dev Biol 31: 79-83 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632241
  19. Ilic-Grubor K, Attree SM, Fowke LC (1998) Induction of microsopre-derived embryos of Brassica napus L. with polyethylene glycol (PEG) as osmoticum in a low sucrose medium. Plant Cell Rep 17: 329-333 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050402
  20. Kasha KJ, Simion E, Oro R, Yao QA, Hu TC, Carlson AR (2001) An improved in vitro technique for isolated microspore culture of barley. Euphytica 120: 379-385 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017564100823
  21. Kasperbauer MJ (1970) Photo- and thermo-control of flowering in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Agron J 62: 825-527 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200060045x
  22. Kameya T, Hinata K (1970) Induction of haploid plants from pollen grains of Brassica. Jpn J Breed 20: 82-87 https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.20.82
  23. Keller WA, Armstrong KC, de la Roche AI (1983) The production and utilization of micros pore-derived haploids in Crassica crops. In: Sen SK, Giles KL (ads) In Plant cell culture in crop improvement. Plenum Press, New York, pp 169-183
  24. Kernan Z, Ferrie AMR (2006) Microspore embryogenesis and the development of a double haploidy protocol for cow cockle (Saponaria vaccaria). Plant Cell Rep 25: 274-280 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0064-7
  25. Kim M, Kim J, Yoon M, Chio D, Lee KM (2004) Origin of multicellular pollen and pollen embryos in cultured anthers of pepper (Capsicum annuum) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 77: 63-72 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TICU.0000016506.02796.6a
  26. Kim M, Jang I, Kim J, Park E, Yoon M, Lee Y (2007) Embryogenesis and plant regeneration of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) through isolated microspore culture. Plant cell Rep 10.1007/s00299-007-0442-4
  27. Kuhlmann U, Foroughi-Wehr B (1989) Production of doubled haploid lines in frequencies sufficient for barley breeding programs. Plant Cell Rep 8: 78-81 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716843
  28. Kyo M, Harada H (1990) Specific phosphoproteins in the initial period of tabacco pollen embryogenesis. Planta 182: 58-63
  29. Li H, Devaux P (2001) Enhancement of microspore culture efficiency of recalcitrant barley genotypes. Plant Cell Rep 20: 475-481 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990100368
  30. Lok Olsen F (1991) Isolation and cultivation of embryogenic microspores from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Hereditas 115: 255-266 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00568.x
  31. Luckett DJ, Darvey NL (1992) Utilisation of microspore culture in wheat and barley improvement. Aust J Bot 40: 807-828 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9920807
  32. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473-497 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  33. Palmer CE, Keller WA, Amison PG (1996) Experimental haploidy in Brassica species. In: Jain SM, Sopory SK, Veilleux RE (eds) In vitro haploid production in higher plants, vol 2. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 143-172
  34. Park E, Kim J, Lee J, Jang I, Yoon M, Chumg S, Kim M (2005) The influence of pretreatment period, 2-hydroxynicotinic acid, and anther co-pretreatment on embryo induction in isolated micros pore culture of Capsicum annuum L. Kor J Plant Biotech 32: 37-44 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2005.32.1.037
  35. Pedroso MC, Pais MS (1994) Induction of microspore embryogenesis in Camellia japonica cv. Elegans. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 37: 129-136 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043606
  36. Pescitelli SM, Johnson CD, Petolino JF (1990) Isolated microspore culture of maize: effects of isolation technique, reduced temperature, and sucrose level. Plant Cell Rep 8: 628-631 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270070
  37. Raina Sk, Irfan ST (1998) High-frequency embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from isolated microspores of indica rice. Plant Cell Rep 17: 957-962 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050517
  38. Regner F (1996) Anther and rnicrospore culture in Capsicum, In: Jain SM, Sopory SK, Veilleux RE (eds) In vitro haploid production in higher plants, vol 3. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 77-89
  39. Shariatpanahi ME, Belogradova K, Hessamvaziri L, Heberle-Bors E, Touraev A (2006) Efficient embryogenesis and regeneration in freshly isolated and cultured wheat (Tdticum aestivum L) rnicrospores with stress pretreatment. Plant Cell Rep 25: 1294-1299 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0205-7
  40. Shtereva LA, Zagorska NA, Dimitrov BD, Kruleva MM, Oanh HK (1998) Induced androgenesis in tomato (Lycopersjcon escuJentum Mill). II. Factors affecting induction of androgenesis. Plant Cell Rep 18: 312-317 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050578
  41. Siebel J, Pauls KP (1989) A comparison of anther and micros pore culture as a breeding tool in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet 78: 473-47 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290830
  42. Swanson EB (1990) Microspore culture in Brassica. In: Pollard JW, Walker JM (eds) Methods in molecular biology, vol 6. Plant cell and tissue culture. Humana Press, New Jersey, pp 159-170
  43. Testillano PS, Gonzalez-Melendi P, Ahmadian P, Fadon B, Risueno MC (1995) The immunolocalization of nuclear antigens during the pollen developmental program and the induction of pollen embryogenesis. Exp Cell Res 221: 41-54 https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1995.1350
  44. Thurling N, Chay PM (1984) The influence of donor plant genotype and environment on production of multicellular microspores in cultured anthers of Brassica napus ssp. oieiters: Annals Bot 54: 681-693 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086838
  45. Touraev A, Indrianto A, Wratschko I, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E (1996) Efficient microspore embryogenesis in wheat (Triticum eestivum L.) induced by starvation at high temperature. Sex Plant Reprod 9: 209-215 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173100

Cited by

  1. High-quality embryo production and plant regeneration using a two-step culture system in isolated microspore cultures of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) vol.112, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0222-x