DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Evaluation of Custom Foot Orthotics for Injury Prevention of Joggers

달리기 동호인들의 상해예방을 위한 맞춤형 발 보장구의 평가연구

  • Published : 2006.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of foot orthotics on the overall comfort and muscle activity during running. The subjects were 10 members from the joggers' club which consisted of 2 women and 8 men. These individuals ran on the treadmill by 4.0m/s speed with and without the custom foot orthotics. The data concerning the overall comfort was collected by a questionairre that examined the overall comfort, heel cushioning, forefoot cushioning, medio-lateral control, arch height, heel cup fit, shoe heel width, forefoot width, and shoe length The MegaWin ver. 2.1(Mega Electronics lid, Ma. Finland) was used to gain electromyography signals of the muscle activity; Tibialis anterior, medial gastronemius, lateral gastronemius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, biceps femoris, and rectus femoris were measured. The results of the study were as follows. 1. During running the overall comfort was higher for the foot arthotic condition than the nonorthotic condition. Among the inquiries the overall comfort showed the biggest difference comparing the two conditions. and the shoe heel width showed the highest score for contort. 2 The muscle activity of the biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis in the stance period decreased. due to the foot orthotics. The muscle activity of the vastus medialis in the swing period also decreased and the muscle activity tibialis anterior in the stance and swing stance decreased as well During running, orthotics showed positive result in foot comfort. The foot comfort related to decreased stress, muscle activity, and foot arch strain. Overall comfort and the adequate decrease of muscle activity were associated with injury prevention and the best method to prevent injury semms to be the maintenance of foot comfort.

Keywords

References

  1. 김승재, Stefanyshyn, D., 김로빈(2005). 평지와 오르막 경사의 트레드밀 걷기와 달리기 동안 발보장구가 발바닥근막염과 관련된 발아치 스트레인에 미치는 영향. 한국운동역학회지, 15(1):155-176.
  2. 조선일보. (2003.8.16)
  3. Blake, R.L., & Denton, J.A. (1985). Functional foot orthoses for Athietic injuries: A retrospective study. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 75(7), 359-362. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-75-7-359
  4. Bordelon, R.L. (1989). Orthotics, Shoes, and Brace. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 20(4), 751-757.
  5. Brody, D.M.(1980). Running injuries. Clinical Symposia, 32:2-36.
  6. Donatelli, R., Hurlbert, C., Conaway, D., & Pierre, R. (1988). Biomechanical foot orthotics: A retrospective study. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 10(6), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1988.10.6.205
  7. Frederick, E.C., Clarke, T.E., & Hamill, C.L. (1984). The effect of running shoe design on shock attenuation. In E. C. Frederick (Ed.), Sport shoes and playing surfaces(pp. 190-198). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  8. Gross, M.L., Davlin, L.B., & Evanski, P.M. (1991). Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 19(4), 409-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659101900416
  9. Gross, M.L., & Napoli, P.C. (1993). Treatment of lower extremity injuries with orthotic shoe insert. Sports Medicine, 15(1), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199315010-00006
  10. Komi, PV., Gollhofer, A., Schmidtbleicher D, Frick, U. (1987). Interaction between man and shoe in running: considerations for a more comprehensive measurement approach. Inter- national Journal of Sports Medicine, 8, 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1025655
  11. Lee, A. & McCullagh, P.J. (1984). A preliminary investigation into the shock absorbancy of running shoes and shoe insert. Journal of Human Movement Study, 10, 95-106.
  12. Mann, R.A.(1982). Biomechanics of running. In R.P. Mack (Ed.), The Foot and Leg in Running (pp. 1-29). London: CV Mosby Company.
  13. Mckenzie, D.C. (1987). The role of shoe and orthotics. Medicine and Sports Science, 23, 30-38.
  14. McPoil, T.G., & Cornwall, M.W. (1991). Rigid versus soft orthoses: A single subject design. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 81(12), 638-642. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-81-12-638
  15. Moraros, J., & Hodge, W. (1993). Orthotic survey: preliminary results. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 83(3), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-83-3-139
  16. Mueller, M.J., Host, J.V., & Norton, B.J.(1993). Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. Journal of the American Podiatry Medical Association, 83(4):198-202. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-83-4-198
  17. Mundermann, A., Nigg, B.M., Stefanyshyn, D.J., & Humble, R.N.(2002). Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running. Gait & Posture, 16(1):38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00197-7
  18. Nachbauer, W., & Nigg, B.M. (1992). Effects of arch height and arch flattening of the foot on ground reaction forces in runing. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 24(11), 1264-1269.
  19. Nawoczenski, D.A., Cook TM., Saltzman CL. (1995). The effect of foot orthotics on three- dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 21, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1995.21.6.317
  20. Nachbauer, W., & Nigg, B.M. (1992). Effects of arch height and arch flattening of the foot on ground reaction forces in runing. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 24(11), 1264-1269.
  21. Nawoczenski, D.A., Cook TM., Saltzman CL. (1995). The effect of foot orthotics on three- dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 21, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1995.21.6.317
  22. Nawoczenski, D.A., & Ludewig, P.M.(1999). Electrom- yographic effects of foot orthotics on selected lower extremity muscles during running. Arch Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(5): 540-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90196-X
  23. Nigg, B.M. (1995). Kinematic Analysis of Shoe Inserts. Human Perfermance Laboratory, University of Calgary, Canada.
  24. Nigg, B.M.(2001). The role of impact forces and foot pronation: a new paradigm. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 11(1):2-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200101000-00002
  25. Nigg, B.M., Bahlsen, H.A., Denoth, J., & Luethi, S.M. (1986). Factors influencing kinetics and kinematic variables in running. In B. M. Nigg(Ed.), Biomechanics of Running Shoes (pp.1-25). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  26. Nigg, B.M., Herzog, W., & Read, L.J. (1988). Effects of viscoelastic shoe insoles on vertical impact forces in heel-toe running. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 16, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658801600113
  27. Nigg, B.M., & Morlock, M. (1987). The influence of lateral heel flare of running shoes on pronation and impact forces. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 19(3), 294-302.
  28. Nigg, B.M., Nurse, M.A., & Stefanyshyn, D.J.(1999). Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 31(7 Suppl):S421-428. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199907001-00003
  29. Shiba N., Kitaoka H.B., Cahalan, P.T., & Chao, E.Y.S. (1995). Shock-absorbring effect of shoe insert materials commanly used in managenent of lower extremity disorders. Clinical Ortho- paedics and Related Research, 310, 130-136.
  30. Stacoff, A., Reinschmidt, C., Nigg, B.M., van den Bogert, A.J., Lundberg, A., Denoth, J., & Stussi, E.(2000). Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clinical Biomechanics, 15:54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00028-5
  31. Struck, R.M., Moore, R., Patwardhan, A.G., & Sartori, M. (1988). Forces under the hallux rigidus foot with surgical and orthotic intervention. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 78(9), 465-468. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-78-9-465
  32. Thomson, J.D., Ounpuu, S., Davis, R.B., & DeLuca, P.A. (1999). The effects of ankle-foot orthoses on the ankle and knee in persons with myelomeningocele: An evaluation using three-dimensional gait analysis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 19, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-199901000-00007
  33. Tomaro, J., & Burdett, R.G. (1993). The effects of foot orthotics on the EMG activity of selected leg muscles during gait. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 18(4), 532-536. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1993.18.4.532
  34. Vankoski, S.J., Michaud, S., & Dias, L. (2000). External tibial torsion and the effectiveness of the solid ankle-foot orthoses. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 20, 249-355.
  35. Wenger, D.R., Mauldin, D., Speck, G., Morgan, D., & Leiber, R.L. (1989). Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children. The journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 71-A(6), 800-810.