DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Gait Asymmetry in Children with Down Syndrome

다운증후군 아동들의 보행 비대칭성 연구

  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

A large interindividual variability and some abnormally kinematic patterns at the lower extremity were the main features of the gait in children with Down syndrome. The purposes of this study were to investigate the gait asymmetry and biomechanical difference between dominant leg and non dominant leg in children with Down syndrome. Seven boys with Down Syndrome(age: $120{\pm}0.9yrs$, weight $34.4{\pm}8.4kg$, leg length: $68.7{\pm}5.0cm$) participated in this study. A 10.0 m ${\times}$ 1.3 m walkway with a firm dark surface was built and used for data collection. Three-dimensional motion analyses were performed to obtain the joint angles and range of motions. The vertical ground reaction forces(%BW) and impulses($%BW{\cdot}s$) were measured by two force plates embedded in the walkway. Asymmetry indices between the legs were computed for all variables. After decision the dominant leg and the non dominant leg with max hip abduction angle, paired samples t-test was employed for selected kinematic and ground reaction force variables to analyze the differences between the dominant leg and the non dominant leg. The max hip abduction angle during the swing phase showed most asymmetry, while the knee flexion angle at initial contact showed most symmetry in walking and running. The dominant leg showed more excessive abduction of hip in the swing phase and more flat-footed contact than the non dominant leg. Vertical peak force in running showed more larger than those of in walking, however, vertical impulse showed more small than walking due to decrease of support time. In conclusion, the foot of dominant leg contact more carefully than those of non dominant leg. And also, there are no significant difference between the dominant leg and the non dominant leg in kinematic variables and ground reaction force due to large interindividual variability.

Keywords

References

  1. Carmeli, E., Kessel, S., Coleman, R,. & Ayalon, M. (2002). Effects of a treadmill walking program on muscle strength and balance in elderly people with down syndrom Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Science, 57A(2), M106-M110.
  2. Devita P., Hong, D., & Hamill, J. (1982). Effects of asymmetric load carrying on the biomechanics of walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 24(12), 89-125.
  3. Griffin, M P., Olney, S. J., & McBride, I. D. (1995). Role of symmetry in gait performance of stroke subjects with hemiplegia. Gaff and Posture, 3, 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(95)99063-Q
  4. Hamill, J., Bates, B. T., & Knutzen, K M (1984). Ground reaction forces symmetry during walking and running. Research Quarterly, 55, 288-293.
  5. Hayes, A, & Batshaw, M L (1993). Down syndrome. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 40, 523-535.
  6. Herzog, W., Nigg, B. M, & Read, L J. (1988). Quantifying the effects of spine manipulations on gait using patients with low back pain. Journal of Manipulative Physiology Therapy, 11, 151-157.
  7. Heydar, S., Paul, A, Francois, P., & Hubert L (2000). Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait and Posture, 12,34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00070-9
  8. Hirasawa, Y. (1979). An observation on standing ability of Japanese males and females. Journal of Anthropometry Society Nippon, 87, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1537/ase1911.87.81
  9. Kaufman, K. R, Miller, L S., & Sutherland, D, H (1996). Gait asymmetry in patients with limb-length inequality. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 16, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199603000-00002
  10. Matteo, C (2002). Gait analysis of individuals with down syndrome. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, 16(2), 303-321.
  11. Parker, A W., & Bronks, R (1980). Gait of children with down syndrome. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 61, 345-351.
  12. Parker, A W., Bronks, R, & Snyder, C W. (1986). Walking patterns in down syndrome. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 30, 317-330.
  13. Patton, J. R, Payne, J. S., & Beirne-Smith, M (1990). Mental retardation(3rd ed.). Columbus, OH Merrill.
  14. Robinson, R Q, Herzog, W., & Nigg, B. M. (1987). Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. Journal of Manipulative Physiology Therapy, 10, 172-176.
  15. Sadeghi, H, Sadeghi, S., Allard, P., Labelle, H, & Duhaime, M. (2001). Lower limb muscle power relationships in bilateral able-bodied gait. American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 80, 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200111000-00006
  16. Skinner, H B., & Effeney, D. J. (1985). Gait analysis in amputee. American Journal of Physilolgy Medicine, 64(2), 82-89.
  17. Sutherland, D. H., Olshen, R, Cooper, L., & Daniel, D. (1980). The development of mature gait. American Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 62, 336-353.
  18. Sutherland, D. H. (1984). Gait Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 201.
  19. Titianova, E. B., & Tarkka, I. M (1995). Asymmetry in walking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 32(3), 236-244.
  20. Tylkowski, C M, Simon, S. R, & Mansour, J. M (1982). Internal rotation gait in spastic cerebral palsy. Proceedings of the 10th open scientific meeting of the hip society. 89-125.
  21. White, M. J. (1972). Hemispheric asymmetries in tacbistoscopic information processing. British Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 497-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1972.tb01299.x