The width of the incisive canal and labial alveolar bone of the incisive canal: an assessment on CT images

전산화단층영상에서 절치관 및 순측 치조골 폭경에 관한 연구

  • Roh Yang-Gyun (Department of Periodontology and Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jang Hyun-Seon (Department of Periodontology and Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim Byung-Ock (Department of Periodontology and Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim Jin-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 노양균 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 및 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 장현선 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 및 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 김병옥 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 및 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 김진수 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학교실 및 구강생물학연구소)
  • Published : 2006.09.01

Abstract

Purpose : To assess the width of the labial alveolar bone of the incisive canal and the width of the incisive canal on spiral computed tomographic images of the anterior portion of the maxilla. Materials and Methods : Study materials included 38 CT scans taken for preoperative planning of implant placement. Axial cross-sectioned image entirely showing the incisive canal was selected and scanned with 600 DPI resolution. The width of the labial alveolar bone of the incisive canal at an orifice to the oral cavity, middle portion, and an orifice to the nasal cavity and the diameter of the incisive canal at the middle portion were determined by two specialist using Digora for Windows 2.1 The statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 12.0.1. Results : When the maxillary central incisors remained, the mean labial alveolar bone width were $6.81{\pm}1.41mm,\;6.46{\pm}1.33mm$, and $7.91{\pm}1.33mm$. When the maxillary central incisors were missed the mean width were $5.42{\pm}2.20mm,\;6.23{\pm}2.29mm$, and $7.89{\pm}2.13mm$. Conclusions : The labial alveolar bone width at middle portion and an orifice to the nasal cavity were of no statistical significant difference according to presence of the maxillary central incisors (P>0.05). The width between oral cavity and nasal cavity, middle portion and to nasal cavity revealed statistically significant difference (P<0.05).

Keywords