대한지리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Geographical Society)

대한지리학회 (The Korean Geographical Society)
권호 표지

사회운동의 공간성: 사회운동연구에 있어서 지리학적 기여에 대한 탐색

Towards the Spatiality of Social Movements: Exploring Geographical Contributions to the Study of Social Movements

  • 정현주 (건국대학교 기초과학연구소)
  • Jung Hyun-Joo (Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Konkuk University)
  • 발행 : 2006.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 현대 사회운동 연구의 대표적인 접근법인 자원동원이론, 프레임이론, 신사회운동이론을 비판적인 관점에서 비교 고찰하며 이들의 한계를 극복할 수 있는 방안을 사회운동의 공간성에 대한 고찰을 통해 제시하고 있다. 현대 사회운동 연구의 주류 패러다임을 형성해 온 자원동원이론과 프레임 이론은 최근 논쟁정치 연구로 통합되고 있는데 이들은 사회운동의 동원과 전략, 정치적 과정에 초점을 맞추어 사회운동의 원리와 일반적인 법칙을 제시하고자 하였다. 그러나 사회운동의 전략적인 측면에 치우쳐 사회운동의 동인을 분석할 수 있는 틀을 개발하지 못하였고 이는 사회운동의 과정과 맥락에 대한 인식부족을 가져왔다. 신사회운동 이론은 새로운 사회운동의 발발을 거시적이고 구조적 관점에서 설명하고 있으나 추상적이고 대상지역이 한정되어 있다는 한계를 노 정해 왔다. 사회운동의 공간성에 대한 연구는 사회운동의 지역적 차이에 대한 심층적 이해를 도모하며 사회운동을 촉발시킨 갈등구조가 형성되고 집단행동이 조직되는 국지적 맥락에 대한 풍부한 통찰력을 제공해 준다. 또한 공간의 물리적 구조와 상징성은 운동의 규모와 방법을 제한하며 사회운동에 의해 활용되기도 하는 전략적 매개체이다. 사회운동의 공간성은 사회운동의 다양성과 역동성을 설명해주는 유용한 개념이 될 수 있다.

The paper critically examines resource mobilization theories, frame theory, and new social movement theories, and proposes studies on the spatiality of the social movements as one potential to mitigate the limitation in these theories. The resource mobilization theories and the frame theory, the strategy-oriented approaches, lack contextual understandings of the origin of social movements. While new social movement theories provide macro-scale analysis and the structural explanations of the origins of social movements, they have covered limited geographical areas. The spatiality of social movements promotes deep understandings of local differences, and contexts in and through which grievances are constructed and collective actions are organized. Physical structures and symbolic representations of places are often created and utilized as social movement strategies. The spatiality of social movements can be a useful conceptual tool to explain the diversity and the dynamics of social movements.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김유미, 2004, 사회운동의 의제동학 연구: 내린천댐과 탐진댐 건설 반대운동 사례 비교, 서울대학교 석사학위논문
  2. 김혜진, 2001, 정치적 기회구조와 사회운동의 미시 동원 기제: 총선시민연대와 민주노동당의 사례에 대한 구성주의적 접근, 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  3. 박춘서, 2005, '대항공론영역으로서 인터넷에서의 대안언론적 요소의 구현에 대한 고찰: 시민단체의 인터넷 운용을 중심으로,' 언론과학연구, 5(3), 227-272
  4. 윤민재, 2005, '네트워크 시대의 사회운동: 인터넷과 초국적 사회운동을 중심으로,' 담론201, 8(2), 93-129
  5. 이병하, 2000, 총선시민연대를 통해서 본 시민운동 연대형성과 낙천, 낙선운동, 연세대학교 석사학위논문
  6. Adams, P. C., 1996, Protest and the scale politics of telecommunications, Political Geography, 15(5), 419-441 https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(95)00088-7
  7. Alvarez, Sonia, Dagnino, Evelina and Escobar, Arturo, 1998, Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-Visioning Latin American Social Movements, Westview Press, Boulder
  8. Aminzade, Ronald R., Goldstone, Jack A., McAdam, Doug, Peny, Elizabeth J., Sewell, William H. Jr., Tarrow, Sidney., and Tilly, Charles (eds.), 2001, Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York
  9. Billig, M., 1995, Rhetorical psychology, ideological thinking, and imagining nationhood, in Morris, A. D. and Mueller, C. M. (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, Yale University Press, New Haven, 64-84
  10. Brenner, N., 1997, State, territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale: urban and regional planning in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1960-1990, Political Geography, 16(4), 273-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00003-0
  11. Brenner, N., 1998, Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16(4), 459-481 https://doi.org/10.1068/d160459
  12. Buechler, Steven M., 2000, Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism, Oxford University Press, New York
  13. Gamson, William A., 1992, Talking Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York
  14. Delaney, D. and Leitner, H., 1997, The political construction of scale, Political Geography, 16(2), 93-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00045-5
  15. Gamson, W. A., 1995, Constructing social protest, in Johnston, H. and Klandermans, B. (eds.), Social Movements and Culture, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 85-106
  16. Gitlin, Todd, 1980, The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left, University of California Press, Berkely
  17. Giugni, M. G., and Passy, F., 1998, Contentious politics in complex societies: new social movements between conflict and cooperation, in Giugni, M. G., McAdam, D. and Tilly, C. (eds.), From Contention to Democracy, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, 81-108
  18. Gregory, Derek, 1994, Geographical Imaginations, Blackwell, Oxford
  19. Habermas, J.. 1981, New social movements. Telos, 49, 33-37
  20. Habermas, Jergen, 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.2, Beacon Press, Boston
  21. Harvey, David, 1982, The Limits to Capital, Blackwell, Oxford
  22. Harvey, David, 1985, The Urbanization of Capital, Blackwell, Oxford
  23. Hasson, S., 1997, Local cultures and urban protests, in Pile, S. and Keith, M. (eds.), Geographies of Resistance, Routledge, New York, 236-257
  24. Hirsch, J., 1988, The crisis of fordism, transformations of the 'Keynesian' security state, and new social movements, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 10, 43-56
  25. Hooks, Bell, 1990, Yearning: Gender, and Cultural Politics, South End Press, Cambridge
  26. Hsieh, Jolan, 2006, Collective Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Identity-Based Movement of Plain Indigenous in Taiwan, Routledge, New York
  27. Jenkins, J., 1983, Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements, Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527-553 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523
  28. Jenson, J., 1995, What's in a name? nationalist movements and public discourse, in Morris, A. D. and Mueller, C. M. (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, Yale University Press, New Haven, 107-126
  29. Jou, S.C., 2006. 6., Interview(in Taiwan National University, Taipei)
  30. Jung, Hyunjoo, 2004, Space, Place and Scale in Contentious Politics: the Case of Greenbelt Movements in South Korea between 1998 and 1999, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
  31. Jung, H., 2005, Scale in contentious politics: the case of greenbelt controversy, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 8(3), 121-137
  32. Kearns, G., 1993, The city as spectacle: Paris and the Bicentenary of the French revolution, in Kearns, G. and Philo, C.(eds.), Selling Places: The City as Cultural Capital, Past and Present, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 49-102
  33. Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998, Activists Beyond Borders, Cornell University Press
  34. Kelly, P., 1997, Globalization, power and the politics of scale in the Philippines, Geoforum, 28(2), 151-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(97)00009-2
  35. Klandermans, B., 1992, The social construction of protest and multiorganizational field, in Morris, A. D. and Mueller, C. M. (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, Yale University Press, New Haven, 77-103
  36. Kurtz, H., 2003, Scale frames and counter scale frames: constructing the problem of environmental injustice, Political Geography, 22, 887-916 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.09.001
  37. Lefebvre, Henry, 1974, The Production of Space, Blackwell, Cambridge
  38. Lefebvre, H., 1979, Space: social product and use value, In Freiburg, J. W. (ed.), Critical Sociology: European Perspectives, Irvington, New York, 285-295
  39. Marston, S., 2000, The social construction of scale, Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219-242 https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200674086272
  40. Martin, Deborah, 1999, Claiming Place and Community: Place Identity and Place-Based Organizing in Inner-City Neighborhoods, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
  41. McAdam, Doug, 1982, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  42. McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney and Tilly, Charles, 2001, Dynamics of contention, Cambridge University Press, New York
  43. McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N., 1973, The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization, General Learning Press, Morristown
  44. Melucci, A., 1980, The new social movements: a theoretical approach, Social Science Information, 19, 199-226 https://doi.org/10.1177/053901848001900201
  45. Melucci, A., 1988, Getting involved: identity and mobilization in social movements, International Social Movement Research, 1, 329-348
  46. Melucci, A., 1994, A strange kind of newness: what's new in new social movements?, in Larana, E, Johnston, H. and Gusfield, J. R. (eds.), New Social Movements: from Ideology to Identity, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 101-130
  47. Miller, Byron, 2000, Geography and Social Movements. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
  48. Nagar, R. and Leitner, H., 1998, Contesting social relations in communal places: identity politics among Asian communities in Dar es Salaam, in Fincher, R. and Jacobs, J. (eds.), Cities of Difference, Guilford Press, New York, 226-251
  49. Olson, Mancur Jr., 1965, The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University, Cambridge
  50. Pile, Steve and Keith, Michael, 1997, Geographies of Resistance, Routledge, New York
  51. Routledge, P., 1996, Critical geopolitics and terrains of resistance, Political Geography. 15(6/7), 509-531 https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(96)00029-7
  52. Routledge, P., 1997, A spatiality of resistances. In Pile, S. and Keith, M. (eds.), Geographies of Resistance, Routledge, New York, 68-86
  53. Sewell, W. H. Jr., 2001, Space in contentious politics. in Aminzade, R. R., Goldstone, J. A., McAdam, D., Perry, E. J, Sewell, W. H. Jr., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. (eds.), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 51-88
  54. Slater, D., 1997, Spatial politics/social movements, in Pile, S. and Keith, M. (eds.), Geographies of Resistance, Routledge, New York, 258-276
  55. Snow, D, Rochford, E. B, Jr., Worden, S., and Benford, R., 1986, Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation, American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481 https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
  56. Steinmetz, G., 2002, Regulation theory, post-marxism, and new social movements, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 36(1), 176-212 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500018934
  57. Swyngedouw, E., 1997, Neither global nor local: 'Globalization' and the politics of scale, in Cox, K. R.(ed.), Paces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, Guilford Press, New York, 137-166
  58. Tarrow, S., 2001, Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics: introduction, in Aminzade, R. R., Goldstone, J. A., McAdam, D., Perry, E. J, Sewell, W. H. Jr., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C.(eds.), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1-13
  59. Thapar-Bjorkert, Suruchi, 2006, Women in the Indian National Movement: Unseen Faces and Unheard Voices, 1930-42, Sage Publications, New Delhi
  60. Touraine, A., 1985, An introduction to the study of social movements, Social Research, 52(4), 749-788
  61. Touraine, A., 1992, Beyond social movements, Theory, Culture, and Society, 9, 125-145
  62. Zhao, D., 1998, Ecologies of social movements: student mobilization during the 1989 prodemocracy movement in Beijing, American Journal of Sociology, 6(May), 1493-1529