Dyeing Characteristics and UV Protection Property of Green Tea Dyed Cotton Fabrics - Focusing on the Effect of Chitosan Mordanting Condition-

  • Kim Sin-Hee (Department of Clothing & Textiles, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Published : 2006.09.01

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the many beneficial aspects of green tea to human such as anti-carcinogenic, anti-aggregant, anti-allergic, anti-bacterial, anti-mutagenic, and anti-oxidant activities. Besides these beneficial aspects, it has been reported that green tea ingredients, especially polyphenolic families (i.e., catechin), have some UV protection property both in vivo and in topical applications. In this study, green tea extract was used as a dyeing stock for cotton and the UV protection property of the dyed cotton fabric was examined. To increase the affinity of cotton fiber to the polyphenolic components in the green tea extract, a natural biopolymer, chitosan, was used as mordanting agent. The effects of chitosan concentration in mordanting on the dyeing characteristics and the UV protection property were examined. Chitosan mordanted green tea dyed cotton showed better dyeing characteristic and higher UV protection property compared with the unmordanted green tea dyed cotton. As the chitosan concentration in mordanting increased, the dyeing efficiency and the UV protection property also increased. Therefore, adapting chitosan mordanting in green tea dyeing can increase the UV protection property of cotton fabrics to some extent.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Ablett, D. C. Whiteman, G. M. Bolye, A. C. Green, and P. G. Parsons, J. Invest. Dermatol., 120(2), 318 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12025.x
  2. B. L. Diffey, J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 1(3), 124 (2002)
  3. J. Garssen, M. Norval, A. El-Ghorr, N. K. Gibbs, C. D. Jones, D. Cerimele, C. De Simone, S. Caffieri, F. Dall'Acqua, F. R. De Gruijl, Y. Sontag, and H. Van Loveren, J. Photoch. Photobio. B, 42(3), 167 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(97)00122-X
  4. G. Reinert, F. Fuso, R. Hilfiker, and E. Schmidt, Text. Chem. Color., 29(12), 36 (1997)
  5. C. Teng and M. Yu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 88, 1180 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11773
  6. I. Algaba and A. Riva, AATCC Rev., 4, 26 (2004)
  7. I. Leaver, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 33, 2795 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1987.070330814
  8. B. Milligan and L. Holt, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 5, 339 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(83)90040-X
  9. B. Milligan and L. Holt, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 10, 335 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(85)90099-0
  10. J. Riedel and H. Hocker, Text. Res. J., 66(11), 684 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1177/004051759606601103
  11. H. Yang, S. Zhu, and N. Pan, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92, 3201 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20327
  12. B. Ding, C.-K. Kim, H.-Y. Kim, M.-K. Seo, and S.-J. Park, Fibers and Polymers, 5(2), 105 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02902922
  13. B. C. Nelson, J. B. Thomas, S. A. Wise, and J. J. Dalluge, J. Microcolumn Separations, 10(8), 671 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(1998)10:8<671::AID-MCS6>3.0.CO;2-A
  14. N. Morley, T. Clifford, L. Salter, S. Campbell, D. Gould, and A. Curnow, Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed., 21, 15 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0781.2005.00119.x
  15. C. A. Elmets, D. Singh, K. Tubesing, M. Matsui, S. Katiyar, and H. Mukhtar, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 44(3), 425 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.112919
  16. S. K. Katiyar, B. M. Bergamo, P. K. Vyalil, and C. A. Elmets, J. Photoch. Photobio. B., 65(2/3), 109 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00248-2
  17. S. K. Katiyar, F. Afaq, A. Perez, and H. Mukhtar, Carcinogenesis, 22(2), 287 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/22.2.287
  18. H. Hibasami, Y. Achiwa, T. Fujikawa, and T. Komiya, Anticancer Res., 16, 1943 (1996)
  19. P. K. Vayalil, A. Mittal, Y. Hara, C. A. Elmets, and S. K. Katiyar, J. Invest. Dermatol., 122(6), 1480 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22622.x
  20. M. Hirose, Y. Mizoguchi, M. Yaono, H. Tanaka, T. Yamaguchi, and T. Shirai, Cancer Lett., 112, 141 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3835(96)04560-0
  21. S. K. Katiyar, R. Agarwal, and H. Mukhtar, Cancer Res., 53, 5409 (1993)
  22. S. K. Katiyar and H. Mukhtar in 'Metabolic Consequences of Changing Dietary Patterns', (A. P. Simopoulos Ed.), Vol.79, pp.154-184, World Rev. Nutr. Diet., Basel, Karger, 1996
  23. V. W. Setiawan, Z.-F. Zhang, G.-P. Yu, Q.-Y. Lu, Y.-L. Li, M.-L. Lu, M.-R. Wang, C.-H. Guo, S.-Z. Yu, R. C. Kurtz, and C.-C. Hsieh, Int. J. Cancer, 92, 600 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.1231
  24. M.-H. Han, J. Korean Soc. Dyers and Finishers, 12(5), 29 (2000)
  25. S.-Y. Park, Y.-J. Nam, and D.-H. Kim, J. Korean Soc. Dyers and Finishers, 14(1), 1 (2002)
  26. J.-E. Lee, H.-J. Kim, and M.-C. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Dyers and Finishers, 13(3), 11 (2001)
  27. M.-H. Han, J. Korean Soc. Dyers and Finishers, 12(2), 51 (2000)
  28. R. A. Muzzarelli, 'Chitin', pp.87-122, Pergamon Press, New York, 1977
  29. P. Kubelka and F. Munk, Z. Tech. Phys., 12, 593 (1931)
  30. Y. Shin and H. Choi, J. Kor. Soc. Clo. Text., 23(4), 510 (1999)
  31. M.-K. Song and E.-Y. Song, J. Kor. Soc. Clo. Text., 29(6), 745 (2005)
  32. M.-S. Kwon, D.-W. Jeon, and J.-J. Kim, J. Kor. Soc. Cloth. Ind., 7(3), 327 (2005)