A Multilevel Study on the Relationship between the Residential Distribution of High Class (Power Elites) and Smoking in Seoul

서울시 동별 상류계층(파워엘리트) 주거 분포와 흡연과의 관련성에 대한 다수준분석

  • Kim, Chang-Seok (Department of Urban Engineering, University of Seoul) ;
  • Yun, Sung-Cheol (Division of Epidemiology and Biostatics, Clinical Research Center, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Hye-Ryun (Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs) ;
  • Khang, Young-Ho (Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 김창석 (서울시립대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 윤성철 (서울아산병원 임상연구센터 역학통계부) ;
  • 김혜련 (한국보건사회연구원) ;
  • 강영호 (울산대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2006.01.31

Abstract

Objectives: We examined whether the neighborhood socioeconomic position predicts the smoking rates after adjusting for individual socioeconomic position indicators. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2001 Seoul Health Indicators Survey. The neighborhood socioeconomic position was the residential distribution of the high class (power elites), as measured by the location quotients (LQ) for each administrative dong (district). A high LQ denotes a high neighborhood socioeconomic status. The individual socioeconomic position included education, occupation and income. Age-adjusted smoking rates according to the LQ level were computed with the direct method. The total number of subjects in this study (26,022 men and 28,007 women) was the reference. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was conducted with the individuals at the first level and the neighborhoods at the second level to estimate the odds ratios of smoking with 95% confidence intervals. Results: For men, the age-adjusted smoking rates increased with a decrease in the LQ. For women, the relationship between the age-adjusted smoking rate and the LQ was not clear. The odds of smoking for both genders were greater among those subjects with lower incomes and lower education. The manual occupational class had greater odds of smoking than the non-manual class for the males, while the odds ratio of smoking among females with a manual occupation tended to be lower than those females with a non-manual occupation. For the males, the LQ levels independently predicted smoking after adjustment for individual income. However, this relation between the LQ and smoking in males was explained by full adjustment for the individual socioeconomic position indicators (education, occupation and income). Conclusions: A low level of neighborhood socioeconomic position was associated with higher smoking rates among the men residing in Seoul. This association between the neighborhood socioeconomic position and smoking in men was explained by the individual socioeconomic position. Anti-smoking efforts to reduce geographical inequality in smoking should be directed at reducing the smoking rates between the individuals with different socioeconomic backgrounds in the metropolitan city of Seoul, South Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee SW, Park K, Kang HS, et al. Development Gap Between the Capital Regions and the Noncapital Region in Korea. Seoul: Hanul Academy; 2002 (Korean)
  2. Kim CS. A study on the characteristics and the factors of residential patterns of power elites in Seoul. J Korean Planners Assoc 2002; 37(5): 65-85 (Korean)
  3. Choi EY. The increasing residential segregation and the differentiation of educational environment in Seoul [dissertation]. Korea: Seoul National Univ; 2004 (Korean)
  4. Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Introduction. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF (eds). Neighborhoods and Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003, pp.1-19
  5. Polednak AP. Segregation, Poverty, and Mortality in Urban African Americans. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997
  6. Son M. The relationships of occupational class, educational level and deprivation with mortality in Korea. Korean J Prev Med 2002; 35: 76-82 (Korean)
  7. Kim MH. A multilevel analysis on the association between socioeconomic factors and the metabolic syndrome [dissertation]. Korea: Hanyang Univ; 2002 (Korean)
  8. Kim JM. A multilevel analysis of health behaviors in Korean [dissertation]. Korea: Hanyang Univ; 2003 (Korean)
  9. Lee SM. The effects of individual and community characteristics on the prevalence of chronic disease [dissertation]. Korea: Seoul National Univ; 2004 (Korean)
  10. Lim HJ. Association between abdominal obesity and socioeconomic Factors: multilevel analysis [dissertation]. Korea: Seoul National Univ; 2004 (Korean)
  11. Cho Y, Park GS, Echevarria-Cruz S. Perceived neighborhood characteristics and the health of adult Koreans. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 1285-1297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.054
  12. Jun SH. The effects of neighborhood characteristics on mental and physical health. Health Soc Sci 2003; 13: 113-134 (Korean)
  13. Schwartz S, Carpenter KM The right answer for the wrong question: consequences of type III error for public health research. Am J Public Health 1999; 89(8): 1175-1180 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.8.1175
  14. Rowe KJ. Multi-level Structural Equation Modelling with MLN and LISREL: An Integrated Course (1st edition). Australia, University of Melboume; 1997
  15. Merlo J. Multilevel analytical approaches in social epidemiology: Measures of health variation compared with traditional measures of association. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 550-552 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.8.550
  16. Merlo J, Ostergren PO, Hagberg O, Lindstrom M, Lindgren A, Melander A, Rastam L, Berglund G. Diastolic blood pressure and area of residence: multilevel versus ecological analysis of social inequity. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55: 791-798 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.11.791
  17. Gleave S, Wiggins RD, Joshi H, Lynch K. Identifying Area Effects on Health: A Comparison of Single- and Multi-level Models. In: Boyle P, Curtis S, Graham E, Moore E (eds). The Geography of Health Inequalities in the Developed World: Views from Britain and North America. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company; 2004, pp.219-244
  18. Schall R. Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika 1991; 78: 719-728 https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.4.719
  19. Goldstein H, Browne W, Rasbash J. Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models. Aavailable at http://www.ioe.ac.uk/hgpersonal/variance-partitioning.pdf. 2002
  20. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999
  21. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Do places matter? A multi-level analysis of regional variation in health-related behavior in Britain. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37: 725-733 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90366-C
  22. Kleinschmidt I, Hills M, Elliott P. Smoking behavior can be predicted by neighborhood deprivation measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995; 49(suppl 2): S72-S77 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.49.Suppl_2.S72
  23. Karvonen S, Rimpela A. Socio-regional context as a determinant of adolescents' health behaviour in Finland. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1467-1474 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(96)00044-5
  24. Hart C, Ecob R, Smith GD. People, places and coronary heart disease risk factors: A multilevel analysis of the Scottish hearth Health study archive. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45(6): 893-902 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00431-5
  25. Reijneveld SA. The impact of individual and area characteristics on urban socioeconomic differences in health and smoking. Int J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 33-40 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/27.1.33
  26. Sundquist J, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 841-845 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/28.5.841
  27. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Smoking and deprivation: Are there neighbourhood effects? Soc Sci Med 1999; 48(4): 497-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00360-8
  28. Tseng M, Yatts K, Millikan R, Newman B. Area-level characteristics and smoking in women. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 1847-1850 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1847
  29. Pinilla J, Gonzalez B, Barber P, Santana Y. Smoking in young adolescents: An approach with multilevel discrete choice models. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 227-232 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.3.227
  30. Reijneveld SA. Neighbourhood socioeconomic context and self reported health and smoking: A secondary analysis of data on seven cities. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 935-942 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.12.935
  31. Diez-Roux AV, Merkin SS, Hannan P, Jacobs DR, Kiefe CI. Area characteristics, individuallevel socioeconomic indicators, and smoking in young adults. The coronary artery disease risk development in young adults study. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157(4): 315-326 https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf207
  32. Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Cheadle A, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Psaty B, McBride C. Assessment of community-level influences on individual's attitudes about cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and consumption of dietary fat. Am J Prev Med 1993;9:78-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30744-X
  33. Ross NA, Taylor SM. Geographical variation in attitudes towards smoking: Findings from the COMMIT communities. Soc Sci Med 1998;46: 703-717 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00175-5
  34. Pickett KE, Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: A critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55(2): 111-122 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.2.111
  35. Diez-Roux AV, Link BG, Northridge ME. A multilevel analysis of income inequality and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50(5): 673-687 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00320-2
  36. Schooler C, Feighery E, Flora JA. Seventh graders' self-reported exposure to cigarette marketing and its relationship to their smoking behavior. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 1216-1221 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.86.9.1216
  37. Hackbarth DP, Silvestri B, Cosper W. Tobacco and alcohol billboards in 50 Chicago neighborhoods: market segmentation to sell dangerous products to the poor. J Public Health Policy 1995; 16: 213-230 https://doi.org/10.2307/3342593
  38. Pucci LG, Joseph HM, Siegel M. Outdoor tobacco advertising in six Boston neighborhoods. Evaluating youth exposure. Am J Prev Med 1998; 15: 155-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00034-8
  39. Gray S, Bolger G, Ong G. Tobacco advertising on post offices. BMJ 1992; 305: 223-224 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6847.223