한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제23권2호
  • /
  • Pages.123-128
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지

체세포 복제돼지 생산에 있어서 대리모의 선발과 배란상태 분석

Selection of Surrogates and Analysis of Its Ovulation Status for the Production of Somatic Cell Cloned Piglets

  • Hyun Sang-Hwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeung Yeon-Woo (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee Eun-Song (Department of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim Hyun-Wook (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Gon-Hyung (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeung Eui-Bae (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Production of cloned pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has unlimited value for developing critical biotechnology such as xenotransplantation. Various efforts have been made to establish this technology, and several litters of live piglets have been produced after transfer of SCNT embryos. However, the efficiency is very low compared to piglet production by artificial insemination or natural mating. So far, most studies have been limited to in vitro production of SCNT embryos. This study was conducted to standardize a surrogate recipient (gilts) for transfer of SCNT embryos to improve pregnancy rate. Potential surrogate gilts over 7 months of age were checked for their estrous status by observing external signs; vaginal fluid, vulva redness, vulva swelling, and standing response to back pressure. Viscosity of vaginal fluid was evaluated and classified as none (0), medium (1), and strong (2). Vulva redness and swelling was respectively assessed by none or shrink (0), medium (1), strong (2). Back pressure was estimated by an immediate move (0), standing less than 10 sec (1), and standing over 10 see (2). And then ovulation status of each surrogate was classified as pre-ovulation (PO-17 surrogates), just prior to ovulation (JPO-20 surrogates), in ovulation (IO-12 surrogates), just after ovulation (JAO-14 surrogates) and after ovulation (AO-24 surrogates) at the time of surgery for embryo transfer (ET). Real-time ultrasonographic scanners have been used for pregnancy diagnosis by observing amniotic vesicles. The first pregnancy diagnosis was done on Day 30 after ET and then repeated 2-week interval. In the results, SCNT embryos transferred into JPO surrogates gave better pregnancy rates (45%) than others (4% to 11%) on Day 30 after ET. These result indicates that surrogate gilts in a status just prior to ovulation can offer optimal condition to establish pregnancy by transfer of SCNT pig embryos.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baker RD, Coggins EG. Control of ovulation rate and fertilization in prepubertal gilts. J Anim Sci 1968; 27: 1607-1610 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2761607x
  2. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18: 1055-1059 https://doi.org/10.1038/80242
  3. Day BN, Longenecker DE, Jaffe SC, Gibson EW, Lasley JF. Fertility of swine following superovulation. J Anim Sci 1967; 26: 777-780 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1967.264777x
  4. Dai Y, Vaught TD, Boone J, Chen SH, Phelps CJ, Ball S, Monahan JA, Jobst PM, McCreath KJ, Lamborn AE, Cowell-Lucero JL, Wells KD, Colman A, Polejaeva IA, Ayares DL. Targeted disruption of the alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20: 251-255 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0302-251
  5. Holker M, Petersen B, Hassel P, Kues WA, Lemme E, Lucas-Hahn A, Niemann H. Duration of in vitro maturation of recipient oocytes affects blastocyst development of cloned porcine embryos. Cloning and Stem Cells 2005; 7: 35-44 https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2005.7.35
  6. Hyun S, Lee G, Kim D, Kim H, Lee S, Nam D, Jeong Y, Kim S, Yeom S, Kang S, Han J, Lee B, Hwang W. Production of nuclear transfer-derived piglets using porcine fetal fibroblasts transfected with the enhanced green fluorescent protein. Biol Reprod 2003; 69: 1060-1068 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.014886
  7. Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park KW, Cheong HT, Greenstein JL, Im GS, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS. Production of alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 2002; 295: 1089-1092 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068228
  8. Lee GS, Hyun SH, Kim HS, Kim DY, Lee SH, Lim JM, Lee ES, Kang SK, Lee BC, Hwang WS. Improvement of a porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer technique by optimizing donor cell and recipient oocyte preparations. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 1949-1957 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01294-3
  9. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry AC. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 2000; 289: 1188-1190 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5482.1188
  10. Polejaeva IA, Campbell KH. New advances in somatic cell nuclear transfer: application in transgenesis. Theriogenology 2000; 53: 117-126 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00245-9
  11. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KH. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000; 407: 86-90 https://doi.org/10.1038/35024082
  12. Polge C, Rowson LE, Chang MC. The effect of reducing the number of embryos during early stages of gestation on the maintenance of pregnancy in the pig. J Reprod Fertil 1966; 12: 395-397 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0120395
  13. Polge C. Control of pig reproduction. Buttersworth, London, 1981: 283-285
  14. Pope CE, Day BN, Transfer of preimplantation pig embryos following in vitro culture for 24 or 48 hours. J Anim Sci 1977; 44: 1036-1040 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.4461036x
  15. Pope WF, Lawyer MS, Nara BS, First NL. Effect of asynchronous superinduction on embryo survival and range of blastocyst development in swine. Biol Reprod 1986; 35: 133-137 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod35.1.133
  16. Ratky J, Brussow KP, Solti L,. Torner H, Sarlos P. Ovarian response, embryo recovery and results of embryo transfer in a hungarian native pig breed, Theriogenology 2001; 56: 969-978 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00623-9
  17. Robl JM, First NL. Manipulation of gametes and embryos in the pig. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1985; 33: 101-114
  18. Signoret JP. The mating behaviour of the sow. In; Cole, D.J.A. Pig Production. Butterworths: London, 1971: 295-313
  19. Soede NM, Kemp B. Expression of oestrus and timing of ovulation in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1997; 52: 91-103
  20. Webel SK, Peters JB, Anderson LL. Synchronous and asynchronous transfer of embryos in the pig. J Anim Sci 1970; 30: 565-568 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1970.304565x
  21. Winfield CG. Oestrus detection in pigs. Reviews in Rural Science 1980; 4: 83-86