Nitrogen Uptake and Growth of Soybean Seedlings under Flooding Stress

  • Won Jun-Yeon (Dept. of Liberal Arts, Joongbu Univ.) ;
  • Ji Hee-Chung (Div. of Plant Sci. & Resources, College of Agricultural & Life Science, Chungnam National Univ.) ;
  • Cho Jin-Woong (Div. of Plant Sci. & Resources, College of Agricultural & Life Science, Chungnam National Univ.)
  • Published : 2006.06.01

Abstract

This experiment was carried out on plastic pots ($40cm{\times}25cm{\times}30cm$) filled with sand soil at greenhouse using two soybean cultivars with small seed; one was Pungsannamulkong (PSNK) recognized as a tolerant cultivar against excessive water stress and the other one was Sobaeknamulkong (SBNK) recognized as a susceptible cultivar. Seed was sown with 30 plants of 2 hills, and the amount of applied fertilizer was N; 3.0 g, P; 3.0 g, and K; 3.4 g per $m^2$ with all basal fertilizations. Plants were grown under photoperiod of natural light with day temperature of $31{\pm}5^{\circ}C$ and night temperature of $22{\pm}1^{\circ}C$. The flooding treatment was done for 3, 5, 7 and 10 days by filling pots with tap water up to 1 cm above the level of the soil surface when plants were 2 days after emerging. Nitrogen uptake by leaves of soybeans decreased significantly by the flooding after 6 days. This significant reduction of N uptake by flooding was evidently recognized from the chlorosis of leaves. The dry matter of flooded soybean seedlings significantly decreased compared to non-flooded soybean seedlings at 10 days. The dry matter of roots also showed similar result of the shoot. Shoots had more N reduction than roots under the flooding. This N reduction was more pronounce in SBNK than in PSNK. Chlorophyll content of flooded soybeans showed decreasing or non-increasing tendency, and the reduction of chlorophyll content was more in SBNK than in PSNK from the flooding stress. Nitrate content of soybean seedlings with flooding stress showed decreasing tendency in shoot and root parts. Ammonium content, however, was higher in flooding stress compared to the non-flooding. Flooding caused a remarkable change in the AA (amino acid) composition and TAA (total amino acid) concentration in the leaves of soybean seedlings.

Keywords

References

  1. Alam, S. M. 1999. Nutrient uptake by plants under stress condi­tions. In. M. Pessarakli. Handbook of plant and crop stress. Second edition, Revised and expanded. pp: 285-313. Marcell Dekker, Inc. New York
  2. Ashraf, M. and H. Rehman. 1999. Interactive effects of nitrate and long-term waterlogging on growth, water relations, and gas­eous exchange properties of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Sci. 144: 35-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00055-2
  3. Bacanamwo, M. and L. C. Purcell. 1999. Soybean dry matter and N accumulation responses to flooding stress, N sources and hypoxia. J. Exp. Botany. 50: 689-696 https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/50.334.689
  4. Cataldo, D. A., M. Haroon, L. E. Schrader, and V. L. Youngs. 1975. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue. Commun. Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 6: 71-80 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366547
  5. Chaney, A. L. and E. P. Marbach. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Chlinical Chemistry. 8: 130-132
  6. Drew, M. C. 1997. Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and accumulation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 223-250 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.223
  7. Fehr, W. R. and C. E. Caviness. 1977. Stages of soybean develop­ment. Iowa Agric. Exp. Stn. Spec. Rep., 80
  8. Griffin, J. L. and A. M. Saxton. 1988. Response of solid-seeded soybean to flood irrigation Flood duration. Agron. J. 80: 885-­888 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000060009x
  9. Hideki, S., A. Amemiya, T. Satou, and A. Takenouchi. 1988. Excess moisture injury of soybeans cultivated in a upland field converted from paddy. I. Effects of excessive soil moisture on dry matter production and seed yield. Japan J. Crop Sci. 57: 71-­76 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.57.71
  10. Marchner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, UK
  11. Minchin, F. R. and R. J. Summerfield. 1976. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and vegetative growth of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in waterlogged conditions. Plant and Soil 45: 113-­117 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011133
  12. Puiatti, M. and L. Sodek. 1999. Waterlogging affects nitrogen transport in the xylem of soybean. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 37: 769-773
  13. Scott, H. D., J. DeAngulo, M. B. Daniels, and L. S. Wood. 1989. Flood duration effects on soybean growth and yield. Agron. J. 81: 631-636 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100040016x
  14. Sulivan, M., T. VanToai, N. Fausey, J. Beuerlein, R. Parkinson, and A. Soboyejo. 2001. Evaluating on-farm flooding impacts on soybean. Crop Sci. 41: 93-100 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.41193x
  15. Wilson, J. B. 1988. A review of evidence on the control of shoot: root ratio, in relation to models. Annals of botany. 61: 433-449 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087575
  16. Yordanova, R. Y. and L. P. Popova 2001 Photosynthetic response of barley plants to soil flooding. Photosynthtica. 39: 515-520 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015643710177
  17. Yoshida, D., D. Forno, J. H. Cask, and K.A. Gomez. 1972. Laboratory manual for physiological of rice. The IRRI. 2nd edition