Comparison of Thinprep (Liquid-Based Cytology) and Conventional Cytology : Abnormal Lesion on Bronchoscopy

기관기내시경상 이상병변을 보이는 환자에게 있어 Thinprep검사법과 기존세포검사법의 효율성 및 유용성에 대한 비교

  • Lee, Jung Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Yang, Jung Kyung (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Jung, In Bum (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Jung Hea (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Sul, Hae Jung (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Kim, Yoon Mi (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Kim, Bum Kyeng (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Choi, Yue Jin (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Na, Moon Joon (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Son, Ji Woong (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University)
  • 이정호 (건양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 양정경 (건양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 정인범 (건양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 이정의 (건양대학교 의과대학 진단병리학교실) ;
  • 설혜정 (건양대학교 의과대학 진단병리학교실) ;
  • 김윤미 (건양대학교 의과대학 진단병리학교실) ;
  • 김범경 (건양대학교 의과대학 진단병리학교실) ;
  • 최유진 (건양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 나문준 (건양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 손지웅 (건양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실)
  • Received : 2006.10.26
  • Accepted : 2006.12.07
  • Published : 2006.12.30

Abstract

Background: Liquid-based cytology is currently known as an effective method, and cervical cytology has been shown to be especially effective from of malignancy detection. In our study, the cytological detection rates of the Thinprep (Liquid-based cytology) and conventional cytology (bronchial washing & brushing) for endobronchial lesions were compared. Methods: Between July 2005 and September 2005, the data from 30 patients with respiration symptom, who had shown abnormal lesion on bronchoscopy, were collected. Results: The bronchoscopic biopsy group was consisted of 30 cytodiagnosis specimens, 24 of which were confirmed to be malignant. The others were tuberculosis (4), bronchiectasis and bronchopulmonary fistula (1 each). Of the 24 malignant case, cancer or atypical cells were detected in 19, 17 and 12 of the Thinprep, brushing cytology and washing cytology cases, respectively. None one of the methods detected cancer cells in the non-malignant specimens. Washing cytology has shown sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 50, 100, 100 and 33.3% respectively. Brushing cytology has shown sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 70.8, 100, 100 and 46.2%, respectively. Thinprep has shown sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 79.2, 100, 100 and 54%, respectively. Conclusions: Thinprep (liquid-based cytology) showed better sensitivity and negative predictive values for the evaluation of lung cancer than conventional cytology. However a large-scale study will be needed in the future.

배 경: 액상 세포학 검사법(Liquid-based cytology)은 최근들어 각광을 받고있는 검사방법으로 여러 연구, 특히 산부인과적 영역에서 암진단에 높은 효율성을 보여주고 있다. 본 저자들은 기관지내시경상 이상병변을 보이는 환자에서 세척세포진, 솔질세포진, 액상 세포학 검사법인 Thinprep을 시행하여 진단율 및 효용성을 비교하여 보았다. 방법 및 대상: 본원에서 2005년 6월부터 9월까지 호흡기적 증상을 보여 내원한 환자 중 기관지내시경을 시행하여 병변이 발견된 30명의 환자에서 Thinprep과 기존세포검사를 시행하였다. 결 과: 이상병변을 보였던 30명의 환자 중 조직검사를 통해 암을 진단받은 환자는 24명이었으며 4명은 결핵, 각각 1명씩은 기관지확장증, 기관지-폐누공을 진단받았다. Thinprep에서 암인 24명의 환자 중 19명이, 기존세포검사에서 기관지솔질검사(brushing)을 통해 얻은 결과가 17명, 세척액(washing)은 12명에서 암세포나 비전형세포가 보였다. 두 방법 모두 암이 아닌 환자에서는 비전형세포는 보이지 않았다. 세척세포진검사는 민감도 50%, 특이도 100%, 양성예측도 100%, 음성예측도 33.3%, 솔질세포진검사는 민감도 70.8%, 특이도 100%, 양성예측도 100%, 음성예측도 46.2%, Thinprep에서는 민감도 79.2%, 특이도 100%, 양성예측도 100%, 음성예측도 54%를 보였다. 결 론: 액상 세포학 검사법인 Thinprep은 기존의 검사법보다 민감도, 음성예측도가 큰 검사로 폐암의 진단률을 높이는데 도움을 줄 수 있으며 앞으로 대단위의 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arroliga AC, Matthay RA. The role of bronchoscopy in lung cancer. Clin Chest Med 1993;14:87-98
  2. Linder J. Recent advances in thin-layer cytology, Diagn Cytopathol 1993;18:24-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199801)18:1<24::AID-DC5>3.0.CO;2-U
  3. Compton J, Boyle E, Barck M. Jicha D, Reale FR Sputum cytology: a comparison of two methods, the conventional saccamanno preparation and the Thin-Prep Processor [Abstract]. Acta Cytol 1993;37:797
  4. Miller FS, Pizzo CJ. Cytospin vs. thin-layer technology; nongynecologic evaluation [Abstract], Acta Cytol 1993;37:798
  5. Eurroughs FN, Erozan YS. Comparison of ThlnPtep and conventional preparation in alimentary tract cytopathology [Abstract], Acta Cytol 1993;37:801
  6. Kish JK, Vallera DU, Ruby SG. Comparative study of nongynecologic processing by ThinPrep vs. conventional methodology: ratinale for- the use of ThinPrep [Abstract], Acta Cytol 1993;37:801
  7. Papillo JL, Lee KR, Manna EA, Clinical evlauation of the ThinPrep method for the preparation of nongynecologic material, Acta Cytol 1992;36:651-2
  8. Dudgeon LS, Wrigley CH. On the demonstration of particles of malignant growth in the sputwn by means of wet-film metho. J Laryngol Otol 1935; 50:752 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100041773
  9. Herbut PA, Clerf LH. Bronchogenic carcmoma; diagnosis by Cytologic study of bronchoscopically removed secretions, JAMA 1946;130:1006 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1946.02870150024005
  10. Kvale PA, Bode FR, Kini S, Diagnostic accuracy in lung cancer: comparison of techniques used in assoclalion with flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1976;69:752-7 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.69.6.752
  11. Funahashi A, Browne TK, Houser WC, Hranicka LJ. Diagnostic value of bronchial aspirate and postbron choscopic sputum in fiberoptic bronchoscopy, Chest 1979;76:614-7 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.76.5.614
  12. Mak VH, Johnston ID, Hetzel MR, Grubb C. Value of washings and brushings at fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer, Thorax 1990;45:373-6 https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.45.5.373
  13. Struve-Christensen E, Michaelsen M, Mossing N. 'The diagnostic value of bronchial washing in lung cancer. J Thome Cardiovasc Eurg 1974;68:313-7
  14. Kurtycz DF, Hoerl HD. Thin-layer technology tempered enthusiasm. Diagn Cytcpathol 2000;23:1-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:1<1::AID-DC1>3.0.CO;2-N
  15. Cytyc Corporation, Operator's manaual: ThinPrep Processor, Marlborough, MA; Cytyc Corporation; 1993
  16. Fischler DF, Toddy SM. Nongynecologlc cytclogy utilizing the 'IhinPrep Precessor. Acta Cytol Au 1996;40:689-75
  17. Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:368-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199704)16:4<368::AID-DC14>3.0.CO;2-I
  18. Papillo JL, Lapen D. Cell yield: ThinPrep vs, cytocentrifuge. Acta Cytol 1994;38:33-6
  19. Hees K, Lebeau PB. Cprnparison of conventional and ThinPrep preparations of mucoid cytology samples. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;12:181-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840120221
  20. Rana DN, ODonnell M, Malkin A, Griffin M A comparative study: conventional preparation and ThinF'rep 2000 in respiratory cytology. Cytopathology 2001;12:390-8 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00351.x
  21. Hoerl HD, Sehink J, Hartenbach E, Wagner JL, Kurtycz DF. Exfoliative cytology of promary poorly diifferentiated (small-cell) neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in ThinPrep material: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23: 14-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:1<14::AID-DC3>3.0.CO;2-S
  22. Michael CW, Hunter B. Interpretation of fine-needle aspirates precessed by the ThinFrep technique: cytologic artifacts diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:6-13 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:1<6::AID-DC2>3.0.CO;2-F