KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear Static Analysis for Seismic Performance Evaluation of Multi-Span Bridges Considering Effect of Equivalent SDOF Methods

등가단자유도 방법의 영향을 고려한 다경간 교량의 내진성능 평가를 위한 비탄성 정적해석

  • Received : 2005.11.29
  • Accepted : 2006.02.01
  • Published : 2006.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The capacity spectrum method (CSM) can be used to simply estimate the maximum displacement response of the nonlinear structures. To evaluate seismic performance of multi-span bridges using the CSM, the representative response for structural system should be derived from the multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) responses by using the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (ESDOF) method. The ESDOF method is used to calculate the capacity curve of the structural system from the pushover curves of all piers or structural members estimated by the pushover analysis. In order to evaluate an accuracy of ESDOF methods used in the CSM, the maximum displacements estimated by the CSM incorporating the several ESDOF methods are compared to those by the inelastic time-history analysis for several artificial earthquakes corresponding to the design spectrum.

역량스펙트럼 방법은 비선형 거동을 하는 구조물의 최대 변위응답을 간편하게 산정하는데 사용된다. 역량스펙트럼 방법을 사용하여 다경간 교량의 내진성능을 평가하기 위해서는 구조계를 대표하는 하나의 응답을 등가단자유도계 방법을 이용하여 다자유도 응답들로부터 유도하여야 한다. 등가단자유도 방법은 비탄성 정적해석에 의해 산정된 힘-변위 곡선들로부터 역량곡선을 계산하는데 사용된다. 역량스펙트럼 방법에 사용되는 등가단자유도 방법의 정확성을 평가하기 위하여, 몇 개의 등가단 자유도방법과 결합된 역량스펙트럼 방법에 의해 산정된 최대변위응답을 설계지진스펙트럼에 대응되는 인공지진을 사용한 비탄성 시간이력해석의 변위응답과 비교하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부(2005) 도로교설계기준
  2. 송종걸(2004) 역량스펙트럼 방법을 이용한 다자유도 교량의 비탄성 지진응답 평가, 대한토목학회 논문집, 대한토목학회, 제24권 제3A호, pp. 541-550
  3. 송종걸, 남왕현, 정영화(2005) 횡하중 분포의 영향을 고려한 다경간 교량의 내진성능 평가를 위한 비탄성 정적해석, 대한토목학회 논문집, 대한토목학회, 제25권 제6A호, pp. 1163-1176
  4. 이동근, 송종걸, 윤정방 (1997) 지진에 대한 고층구조물의 시스템 연성요구도 평가방법, 대한토목학회 논문집, 대한토목학회, 제17권 제I-2호, pp. 245-257
  5. Applied Technology Council (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC-40 Report, Redwood city, California
  6. Applied Technology Council (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of building (FEMA 273), and NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 274), ATC 33, Redwood city, California
  7. Applied Technology Council (2004) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures (FEMA 440), ATC-55 Project, Redwood city, California
  8. Bracci, J.M., Kunnath, S.K. and Reinhor, A.M. (1997) Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures, Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 1, pp. 3-10 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)
  9. Calvi, G.M. and Kingsley, G.R. (1995) Displacement-based seismic design of multi-degree-of-freedom bridge structures, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 24, No. 12, pp. 1247-1266 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240906
  10. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2001) A Modal pushover analysis procedure to estimating seismic demands for buildings: Theory and Preliminary evaluation, Report No. PEER 2001/03, University of California, Berkeley
  11. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002) Modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics., Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 561-582 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  12. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1998) A simplified nonlinear method for seismic evaluation of RC bridges, Proc. 6th U.S National Conf. of Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Seattle, Washington, pp. 1-12
  13. Fajfar, P. (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 573-592 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128
  14. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996) The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 34-46
  15. Fajfar, P. (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 979-993 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1
  16. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of building, Washington, D.C.
  17. Fischinger, M., Beg, D., and Isakovic, T. (2004) Performance based assessment-from general methodologies to specific implementations, Int. Workshop on PBSD, New York, US
  18. Freeman, S., Sasaki, K., and Paret, T. (1998) Multi-Mode Pushover Procedure(MMP)-A Method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis, Proc. 6th U.S. National Conf. of Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Seattle, Washington
  19. Gasparini, D. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1976) 'SIMQKE: A Program for Artificial Motion Generation,' MIT
  20. Han, S.W. and Wen, Y.K. (1997) Method of Reliability-based seismic design : equivalent nonlinear systems, Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 3, pp. 256-263 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:3(256)
  21. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviranta, G.D.P.K. (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation, Engineering Structural, Vol. 20, No. 4-6, pp. 452-464 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  22. Lee, D.G., Song, J. K., and Yun, C.B. (1997) Estimation of system-level ductility demands for multi-story structures, Engineering Structures, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 1025-1035 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00010-2
  23. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 357-379 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778
  24. Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G.M. (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  25. Qi, X. and Moehle, J.P. (1991) Displacement design approach for reinforced concrete structures subjected to earthquake, Report No. PEER UCB/EERC-91/02, University of California, Berkeley
  26. Reinhorn, A.M., Simeonov, V., Mylonakis, G., and Reichman (1988) IDARC-BRIDGE : a computational platform for seismic damage assessment of bridge structures, Technical Report MCEER-98-0011, State University of New York at Buffalo
  27. Song, J.K. and Pincheira, J.A. (2002) Spectral displacement demands of stiffness and strength degrading systems, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 817-851 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586141
  28. Villaverde, R. (1996) Simplified response-spectrum seismic analysis of nonlinear structures, Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 3, pp. 282-285 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:3(282)