Transition Structure to Changes in Efficiency and Pattern of Technological Progress by Industries through Development of Patent Mapping Model

산업별 기술발전의 효율 및 형태변동에 대한 추이구조

  • Park, Joon-Ho (Sung Kyun Kwan University, The Institute of S&T) ;
  • Kwon, Cheol-Shin (Sung Kyun Kwan University, Dept. of Systems Management Engineering)
  • 박준호 (성균관대학교 과학기술연구소) ;
  • 권철신 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과)
  • Received : 20060200
  • Accepted : 20060900
  • Published : 2006.12.31

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to analyze the structure of efficiency of R&D input variables and the attributes of patent information as output of R&D activities in the major manufacturing industries (electric & electronics, machinery, chemical, textile) from the mid-1970s to the late-1990s by the development of "mapping technique". To attain this objective we first have examined the attribute of time-lag which depends on the absolute, and the cumulative values between input and output. And on the basis of this result, we have made an analysis on the impact to extract the main variables affecting patent by industries. Moreover, according to time trend of the impact variables, we have analyzed the structure of R&D efficiency, and of technological progress which will be changed with time by patent information. It has been aimed at constructing technological progress patterns in the Korea industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, S. F. and Fang, H. H. P.(1988), U.S. Patent Producriviry, Research Management, 29(5), 29-35
  2. Economic Planning Board, Report on Industrial Census, 1975, 1980, 1985
  3. Economic Planning Board, Report on Mining and Manufacturing 1975-1988 (every year)
  4. Hull, E., Hage, J., and Azumi, K.(1984), Strategies for Innovation and Productivity in Japan and America, Tedmouation, 2, 121-139
  5. Korean Industrial Technology Association, Report on the Survey of Industrial Technology Development 1988-1988 (every year)
  6. Korean Intellectual Property Office, Yearbook of KIPO 1975-1998(every year)
  7. Kondo, M.(1988), Quantitative Analysis of the Dynamics of Japanese R&D in Robotics and Genetic Engineering Using Publication and Patent Data, The Journal of Science Policy and Research Management, 13(2), 172-181
  8. Kondo, M.(1999), R&D Dynamics of Creating Patents in the Japanese Industry, Research Policy, 28, 587-600 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00129-2
  9. Ministry of Science and Technology, Report on the Survey of Research and Development in Science and Technology 1984-1998(every year)
  10. Ministry of Science and Technology, Year book of Science and Technology 1975-1997(every year)
  11. Mueller, D. C.(1966), Patents, Research and Development and the Measurement of Incentive Activity, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 15, 26-37 https://doi.org/10.2307/2097846
  12. Schiffel, D. and Kitti, C.(1978), Rates of Invention: International Patent Comparison, Research Policy, 7, 324-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(78)90010-0
  13. Sirilli, G.(1988), Conceptualizing and Measuring Technological Innovation, IDEA Paper, STEP Group, Norway
  14. Soete, L.(1987), The Impact of Technological Innovation on International Trade Patterns: The Evidence Reconsidered, Research Policy, 16, 101-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90026-6
  15. Trajtenberg, M.(2001), Innovation in Israel 1968-1997: A Comparative Analysis using Patent Data, Research Policy, 30, 369-398