DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Location, Season, and Variety on Yield and Quality of Forage Oat

  • Kim, J.D. (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College) ;
  • Kim, S.G. (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College) ;
  • Abue, S.J. (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College) ;
  • Kwon, C.H. (Division of Animal Husbandry, Cheonan Yonam College) ;
  • Shin, C.N. (Department of Animal Production, Keymung College) ;
  • Ko, K.H. (Department of Animal Production, Keymung College) ;
  • Park, B.G. (Department of Sommelier Beverage Technology, Masan College)
  • 투고 : 2005.08.24
  • 심사 : 2006.01.19
  • 발행 : 2006.07.01

초록

Forage oat (Avena sativa L.) is grown extensively in a double-cropping system on dairy farms. Four oat varieties ('Swan', 'Targa', 'Foothill', and 'Nugene') were evaluated for forage production and forage quality during two growing seasons (spring and autumn) at two locations (central and southern region) in South Korea. The heading stage of four oat varieties was observed during spring, but the autumn season did not produce heading until harvest time except for the 'Swan' variety (early-maturing variety). The heading stage of 'Swan' in both locations was earlier compared to other varieties. The four varieties were resistant to both foliar disease and insects. Lodging resistance was higher during autumn except in 2002 at the central region, and late-maturing varieties ('Foothill' and 'Nugene') have lower lodging resistance. Dry matter (DM) content was significantly different between varieties (p<0.001). Comparing different varieties, 'Swan', an early-maturing variety, was highest in DM content. In DM, total digestible nutrients (TDN) and crude protein (CP) yield, the yield of oat varieties in the southern region was higher than in the central region, and forage yield of the oat varieties in the spring season was higher than during the autumn season. The DM and TDN yield showed significant differences between oat varieties. The CP content of oats grown in the central region (Cheonan) was lower than oats grown in the southern region (Daegu), and the spring season produced oats with lower CP compared to the autumn season. Among the four oat varieties, the CP content of late-maturing varieties was higher than the Swan variety (early-maturing variety). The acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) contents were higher for the varieties grown in Cheonan and during the spring season. The ADF and NDF contents of late-maturing varieties were lower than the early-maturing variety. TDN and relative feed value (RFV) were higher for the varieties grown in Daegu and during the autumn season. Late-maturing variety had higher TDN and RFV than early-maturing variety. Our study showed differences in forage production and forage quality of oats grown in different locations, seasons and varieties. Forage quality as well as forage production was better in the southern region than in the central region. Forage quality was better during autumn, but forage production was better during spring. Late-maturing variety had better forage quality than the early-maturing variety. Therefore, late-maturing varieties are more suitable for use in the southern region.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official Method of Analysis (15th ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
  2. Brundage, A. L., R. L. Taylor and V. L. Burton. 1979. Relative yields and nutritive value of barely, oat, and peas harvested at four successive dates for forage. J. Dairy Sci. 62:740-745 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(79)83317-2
  3. Elizalde, J. C., N. R. Merchen and D. B. Faulkner. 1999. Fractionation of fiber and crude protein in fresh forage during the spring growth. J. Anim. Sci. 77:476-484
  4. Firdous, R. and A. H. Gilani. 2001. Changes in chemical composition of sorghum as influenced by growth stages and cultivar. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:935-940 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.935
  5. Goering, H. L. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis. Agr. Handbook No. 379. USDA
  6. Han, K. J. 1995. Effect of cultivar and management practices on the characteristics and quality of oat hay. Ph. D. Thesis. Seoul National University, Korea
  7. Holland, C., W. Kezar, W. P. Kautz, E. J. Lazowski, W. C. Mahanna and R. Reinhart. 1990. The pioneer forage manual-A nutritional guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int. Inc., Des Moines, IA
  8. Jung, H. G. and M. S. Allen. 1995. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2774-2790
  9. Kim, D. A., J. K. Kim, C. H. Kwon, W. H. Kim, K. J. Han and J. L. Kim. 1993. Comparative yield and nutritive value of oat varieties as fresh-cut forage. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 13:66-77
  10. Kim, D. A., J. K. Kim, C. H. Kwon, W. H. Kim, K. J. Han and J. L. Kim. 1996. Comparative studies of introduced oats for forage production. III. Forage performance of western Australian oat cultivars. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 16:208-214
  11. Kim, D. A., U. B. Chun, J. N. Shin, C. H. Kwon, K. J. Han, J. S. Kim and S. H. Lim. 1997. Evaluation of the government recommended forage cultivars in Korea. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 17:101-109
  12. Kim, J. D., C. H. Kwon and D. A. Kim. 2001. Yield and quality of silage corn as affected by hybrid maturity, planting date and harvest stage. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1705-1711 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.1705
  13. Kim, J. D., C. H. Kwon, C. N. Shin, C. -H. Kim and D. A. Kim. 2005. Effect of location, year and variety on forage yield and quality of winter rye. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:997-1002 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.997
  14. Kim, J. G. and D. A. Kim. 1994. Harvesting date and cultivar effects on the growth characteristics forage yield and quality of spring sown oats. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 14:247-256
  15. Kim, J. G., E. S. Chung, S. Seo, J. S. Ham, W. S. Kang and D. A. Kim. 2001. Effects of maturity at harvest and wilting days on quality of round baled rye silage. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1233-1237 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.1233
  16. Kim, W. H., S. Seo, K. H. Jeong, J. G. Kim, D. E. Shin and J. S. Shin. 1999. Effects of harvest date and cultivar on the growth, forage yield and quality of spring sown oats at the middle mountain area. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 19:89-94
  17. Kipps, M. S. 1970. Production of field crops (6th Ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA
  18. Ko, H. J., H. S. Park, S. G. Kim and D. A. Kim. 2002. Yield and quality of forage mixture as affected by maturity of rye cultivar and Oat-Rye seeding rate. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 44:239-250 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2002.44.2.239
  19. Lee, G. S. and D. A. Kim. 1999. Harvest date and cultivar effects on forage yield and quality of fall sown oat. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 19:339-346
  20. Poehlman, J. M. 1987. Breeding field crops (3rd Ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc. New York, NY
  21. SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS user's guide: Statistics. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC
  22. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometric approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
  23. Stuart, P., J. Slatter, B. Elliott and G. Busby. 2002. The Forage book; a comprehensive guide to forage management (2nd Ed.). Pacific Seeds Pty Ltd., Toowoomba, Australia
  24. Yu, P., D. A. Christensen, J. J. McKinnon and H. W. Soita. 2004. Using chemical and biological approaches to predict energy values of selected forages affected by variety and maturity stage: Comparison of three approaches. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:228-236 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.228
  25. Yang, J. S., H. J. Han, M. S. Lee, J. D. Song and G. J. Park. 1987. Studies on agronomic characteristics and forage yield potentiality of introduced oats. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 29:148-152

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluation of Macro Mineral Contents of Forages: Influence of Pasture and Seasonal Variation vol.20, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.908
  2. Effect of different harvesting times on the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of late and early-maturing forage oats by rumen microbes vol.46, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190003