Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회지)

The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Consumer's Objective Knowledge, Subjective Knowledge and Involvement of Apparel on Product Attribute Evaluation

소비자의 객관적 지식, 주관적 지식과 관여가 의류 상품 속성 평가에 미치는 영향

  • Lee Ji-Yeon (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park Jae-Ok (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
  • Published : 2006.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in the product attribute evaluation in relation to the objective knowledge, subjective knowledge and involvement of apparel. The measurement instruments were developed by researcher on the basis of previous studies in the same field. The subjects of this study were female adults who lived in Seoul, Kyunggi or Incheon areas and quota sampling using age and residential areas was employed. The data were obtained from 603 questionnaires. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 10 and LISREL 7.0. Major statistical methods were factor analysis, Cronbach's a coefficient, multiple regression analysis, and structural equation model analysis. The results were as follows: 1. Involvement was related to the consumer knowledge and the knowledge influenced evaluation of intrinsic attributes, social attributes, and economic attributes. 2. The dimensions of objective knowledge significantly influenced intrinsic attributes and economic attributes. The dimensions of subjective knowledge significantly influenced intrinsic attributes, social attributes and economic attributes. 3. Apparel involvement significantly influenced intrinsic attributes, social attributes and economic attributes. Consumers who have higher interest in apparel product but not in trends considered intrinsic attributes more importantly, whereas consumers who care trends considered social attribute more.

Keywords

References

  1. 고애란. (1994). 국내 및 외국 상표 청바지의 구매의도에 따른 평가적 신념과 추구 이미지 및 의복 태도의 차이 연구. 한국의류학회지, 18(2), 269-272
  2. 김가영. (1998). 의류 상품 평가에 대한 외재적 단서의 영향. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
  3. 김동기, 배수현, 박종원. (1993). 관여도와 제품 지식이 태도와 행동의관계에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구. 마케팅연구, 8(2), 1-17
  4. 김민수. (2002). 의류 제품에 대한 소비자의 품질 평가 기준. 서울여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
  5. 김성환, 전중옥, 이명국. (2000). 소비자 관여와 정보탐색 방식간의 관계. 마케팅관리연구, 5(2), 147-176
  6. 김정희. (1995). 의류 제품에 대한 소비자의 정보탐색 내용. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  7. 박찬욱, 문병준. (2000). 관여도와 제품 지식의 상관관계에 관한 연구: 제품 유형과 제품 지식 측정방법의 조정적 역할을 중심으로. 소비자학연구, 11(1), 75-98
  8. 박찬욱. (2001). 제품 지식이 적은 소비자의 원산지 정보 및 광고모델 정보활용 전략: 정보처리동기와 제품 유형의 조절적 역할을 중심으로. 마케팅연구, 16(2), 49-68
  9. 유동근. (1992). 소비자 행동론. 서울: 선일문화사
  10. 이경훈. (2001). 인터넷 쇼핑몰 이용자의 소비자 관여에 따른 의류 제품 및 웹 서비스 평가기준에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  11. 이미현, 임숙자. (2001). 외재적 단서가 의류 제품 평가에 미치는 영향 (제2보). 한국의류학회지, 25(6), 1091-1098
  12. 이종명. (2000). 패션 상품 소비자의 관여도와 의류 광고 효과과정에 관한 연구. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
  13. 이지연. (1994). 소비자 의류 제품 지식과 외적 정보탐색 활동에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  14. 이지연. (2003). 의류 상품에 대한 소비자 지식의 척도에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 27(11), 1307-1317
  15. 진병호. (1998). 의복 구매 시 소비자가 지각하는 가격 (제2보). 한국의류학회지, 22(5), 628-638
  16. Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research. 13, 411-454 https://doi.org/10.1086/209080
  17. Bei, L., & Richard, H. (1997). The consumer reports mindset: We seeks value-the involved or the knowledgeable? Advances in Consumer Research. 24, 151-158
  18. Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research. 7, 234-348 https://doi.org/10.1086/208812
  19. Brucks, M. (1986). A typology of consumer knowledge content. Advances in Consumer Research. 13, 58-63
  20. Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension process. Journal of Consumer Research. 15(Sep.), 210-224 https://doi.org/10.1086/209158
  21. Duncan, C. D., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1982). External search: The role of consumer beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research. 19, 32-43 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151528
  22. Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women's apparel. Journal of Clothing & Textiles Research. 8(2), 13-22 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800202
  23. Engel, J. E, Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (2001). Consumer behavior. Chicago: The Dryden Press
  24. Fiske, C. A., Luebbehusen, L. A., Miyazaki, A. D., & Urbany, J. E. (1994). The relationship between knowledge and search: It depends. Advances in Consumer Research. 21. 43-49
  25. Flynn, L. R., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). A short, reliable measure of subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research. 46. 57-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00057-5
  26. Heimbach, A. E., Johansson, J. K., & MacLachlan, D. L. (1989). Product familiarity, information processing, and country-of-origin cues. Advances in Consumer research, 16. 460-467
  27. Hong, S., & Toner, J. E (1989). Are there gender differences in the use of country-of-origin information in the evaluation of products? Advances in Consumer Research. 16. 468-472
  28. Kapferer, J. N., & Laurent, G. (1985). Consumers' involvement profile: New empirical results. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 290-295
  29. Kleiser, S. B., & Mantel, S. P. (1994). The dimensions of consumer expertise: A scale development. In R. Achrol, & A. Mitchell (Eds.), AMA Summer educators' proceedings, 5 (pp. 20-26) Chicago: American Marketing Association
  30. Laurent, G., & Karpferer, J. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 41-53 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151549
  31. Mittal, B. (1989). A theoretical analysis of two recent measures of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 697-702
  32. Olson, J. C., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of The Association for Consumer Research, Iowa, 167-179
  33. Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristic. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 223-237 https://doi.org/10.1086/208859
  34. Park, C. W., Motherbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. (1994). Consumer knowledge assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 71-82 https://doi.org/10.1086/209383
  35. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1999). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy (5th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin McGraw-Hill
  36. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
  37. Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 253-264 https://doi.org/10.1086/209162
  38. Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 28-36 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251914
  39. Wood, W., & Stagner, B. (1994). Why are some people easier to influences than others? In S. Shavitt, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (pp. 149-174) Boston: Allyn and Bacon