K-BSID-II Performance in Normal and High Risk Infants : A Three Year Longitudinal Data Analysis

정상 영아 및 장애 위험 영아의 한국 Bayley 영유아발달검사(K-BSID-II) 수행 비교 : 3년 종단자료분석

  • 박혜원 (울산대학교 아동가정복지학과)
  • Received : 2005.10.31
  • Accepted : 2006.01.28
  • Published : 2006.02.01

Abstract

Stability of the Korean Bayley Scale of Infant Development-II was tested in 305 infants by two measurements of varying intervals over a span of 5-36 months. Stability of K-BSID-II performance was r=.62(p<.01), r=.08(p<.18), r=.69(p<.01), r=.18(p<.01) for mental scale raw scores, mental scale index scores (MDI), psycho-motor scale raw scores and psycho-motor scale index scores(PDI), respectively. Stability was higher for the shorter test-retest interval group. Correlations between raw scores among infants with retest intervals of more than 2 years were stable on both mental and psycho-motor scales. MDI showed higher stability among high-risk infants than normal infants while PDI showed higher stability among normal infants. Testers and researchers should use both raw scores and index scores for better interpretations.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국학술진흥재단