대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제44권6호
  • /
  • Pages.690-698
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

IN VITRO STUDY ON EXOTHERMIC REACTION OF POLYMER-BASED PROVISIONAL CROWN AND FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE MATERIALS MEASURED BY DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY

  • Ko, Mun-Jeung (Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Pae, Ahran (Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problems. The heat produced during polymerization of polymer-based provisional materials may cause thermal damage to the vital pulp. Purpose. This study was performed to evaluate the exotherm reaction of the polymerbased provisional materials during polymerization by differential scanning calorimetry and to compare the temperature changes of different types of resins. Material and methods. Three dimethacrylate-based materials (Protemp 3 Garant, Luxatemp Plus, Luxatemp Fluorescence) and five monomethacrylate- based material (Snap, Alike, Unifast TRAD, Duralay, Jet) were selected. Temperature changes of polymer-based provisional materials during polymerization in this study were evaluated by D.S.C Q-1000 (TA Instrument, Wilmington, DE, USA). The following three measurements were determined from the temperature versus time plot: (1) peak temperature, (2) time to reach peak temperature, (3) heat capacity. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison Bonferroni test at the significance level of 0.05. Results. The mean peak temperature was $39.5^{\circ}C({\pm}\;1.0)$. The peak temperature of the polymer-based provisional materials decreased in the following order: Duralay > Unifast TRAD, Alike > Jet > Luxatemp Plus, Protemp 3 Garant, Snap, Luxatemp Fluorescence. The mean time to reach peak temperature was 95.95 sec $({\pm}\;64.0)$. The mean time to reach peak temperature of the polymer-based provisional materials decreased in the following order: Snap, Jet > Duralay > Alike > Unifast TRAD > Luxatemp Plus, Protemp 3 Garant, Luxatemp Fluorescence. The mean heat capacity was 287.2 J/g $({\pm}\;107.68)$. The heat capacity of the polymer-based provisional materials decreased in the following order: Duralay > TRAD, Jet, Alike > Snap, Luxatemp Fluorescence, Protemp 3 Garant, Luxatemp Plus. Conclusion. The heat capacity of materials, determined by D.S.C., is a factor in determining the thermal insulating properties of restorative materials. The peak temperature of PMMA was significantly higher than others (PEMA, dimethacrylate). No significant differences were found among PEMA (Snap) and dimethacrylate (P >0.05). The time to reach peak temperature was greatest with PEMA, followed by PMMA and dimethacrylate. The heat capacity of PMMA was significantly higher than others (PEMA, dimethacrylate). No significant differences were found among PEMA and dimethacrylate (P >0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Billmeyer F.W. Textbook of Polymer Science. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1984. p.71
  2. Vallittu PK. Peak temperature of some prosthetic acrylates on polymerization. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:776-81 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1996.00430.x
  3. Moulding MB, Teplisky PE. Intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restoration. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:299-304
  4. Nyborg H, Brannstrom J. Pulp reaction to heat. J Prosthet Dent 1968;19:605-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(68)90262-X
  5. Driscoll CF, Woolsey G, Ferguson WM. Comparison of exothermic release during polymerization of four materials used to fabricate interim restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:504-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90289-9
  6. Kim SH, Watts DC. Exotherm behavior of the polymer-based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dental Mater 2004;20: 383-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.001
  7. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg 1965;19:515-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90015-0
  8. Tjan AHL, Grant BE, Godfrey MF. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber during fabrication of provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:622-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90578-7
  9. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 7th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1985:48,506
  10. Grajower R, Shaharbani S, Kaufman E. Temperature rise in pulp chamber during fabrication of temporary self-curing resin crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:535- 40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90088-X
  11. McCabe JF, Wilson. The use of differential scanning calorimetry for the evaluation of dental materials. J Oral Rehabil 1995;7:103-10 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00425.x
  12. Moudling MB, Loney RW. The effect of cooling techniques on intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:332-36
  13. Stanley HR. Pulpal response to dental techniques and materials. Dent Clin North Am 1971;15:115-26
  14. O'Neill MJ. Measurement of specific heat functions by differential scanning calorimetry. Analytical Chemistry 1966;38:1331-6 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60242a011
  15. Brown WS, Dewey WA, Jacobs MR. Thermal properties of teeth. J Dent Res 1970;49:752-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490040701
  16. Haas SS, Brauer GM, Dickson G. A characterization of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. J Bone and Joint Surgery 1975;57:380 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197557030-00017
  17. Migliaresi C, Fambri L, Kolarik A. Polymerization kinetics, glass transition temperature and creep of acrylic bone cements. Bio Materials 1994;15:875 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(94)90110-4
  18. Brauer CF, Steinberger DR,Stansbury JW. Dependence of curing time, peak temperature, and mechanical properties on the composition of bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:839 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200614
  19. Wolcott RB, Paffenbarger GC, Schoonover IC. Direct resinous filling materials-temperature rise during polymerization. J Am Dent Assoc 1951;42:253-63 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1951.0055
  20. John OB, Carl WH, Cliff B. Evaluation of resins for provisional restorations. Am J of Dent 1992;5: 137-9
  21. Kaiser DA, Cavazos E. Temporization technique in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1985;29:403-12
  22. Krug RS. Temporary resin crowns and bridges. Dent Clin North Am 1975;19:313-20
  23. Lui JL. Sectos JC, Phillips RW. Temporary restorations. Oper Dent 1986;11:103-10