생명과학회지 (Journal of Life Science)

  • 제16권2호
  • /
  • Pages.219-224
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1225-9918(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3406(eISSN)
한국생명과학회 (Korean Society of Life Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) marker를 이용한 수박의 품종간 유연관계 분석

Assessment of Genetic Relationship among Watermelon Varieties Revealed by ISSR Marker

  • 권용삼 (농림부 국립종자관리소 재배시험과) ;
  • 이원식 (농림부 국립종자관리소 서부지소) ;
  • 조일호 (농림부 국립종자관리소 재배시험과)
  • Kwon Yong-Sham (Variety Testing Division, National Seed Management Office, MAF) ;
  • Lee Won-Sik (Seobu Branch Office National Seed Management Office MAF) ;
  • Cho Il-Ho (Variety Testing Division, National Seed Management Office, MAF)
  • 발행 : 2006.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

ISSR markers를 이용하여 수박 18품종의 유전적 유연관계를 분석하여 얻어진 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 수박 18품종의 genomic DNA와 ISSR primer 100개를 PCR 반응시킨 결과 다형성을 뚜렷하게 나타내는 primer는 21개 이였으며, 이들 primer에 의해 증폭된 밴드는 105개 이였고 다형성을 보이는 밴드는 58개 였으며 증폭된 DNA 단편의 크기는 $0.2{\sim}5.0kb$ 사이에 위치하였다. 다형성을 나타낸 primer는 18개의 anchored primer와 3개의 non-anchored primer로 구분되었고 모든 anchored primer는 2개의 염기서열이 반복된 형태를 나타내었으며, non-anchored primer보다. 다형성 정도가 높게 나타났다. 수박 18품종은 유전적 유사도 값 0.42를 기준으로 할 때 18개 품종을 2개의 그룹 으로 구분할 수 있었으며, 국내에서 육성된 품종은 유전적 유사도가 아주 높은 것으로 분석 되었고, 이들 품종은 수박의 과형에 따라 유사하게 구분되었다.

Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis were used to assess genetic diversity among 18 genotypes of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) including breeding lines and commercial varieties. The 21 ISSR primers selected from 100 primers were showed the amplification of 105 reproducible fragments ranging from about 200 bp to 5000 bp. A total of 58 DNA fragments were polymorphic with an average 2.7 polymorphic bands per primer. The polymorphic primers were divided into 18 anchored primers and 3 non anchored primers. All of the anchored primers were di-nucleotide repeat motif, and was more polymorphic than non anchored primers. Eighteen watermelon genotypes were classified into two large groups. Clustering was in some accordance with the division of fruit shape into 18 watermelon. Therefore, ISSR markers may be suitable for variety discrimination and for constructing a linkage map of watermelon.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bates, D. M. and R. Robinson. 1995. Cucumber, melons, and watermelon : Cucumis and Citrullus (Cucurbitaceae). pp. 89-96, In Smartt, J. and N. W. Simmonds (eds.), Evolution of Crop Plants. Longman, London
  2. Blair, M. W., O. Panaud and S. R. McCouch. 1999. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 98, 780-792 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051135
  3. Che, K. P., C. Y. Liang, Y. G. Wang, D. M. Jin and B. Wang. 2003. Genetic assessment of watermelon germplasm using the AFLP technique. HortScience 38, 81-84
  4. Fang, D. Q. and M. L. Roose. 1997. Identification of closely related citrus cultivars with inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95, 408-417 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050577
  5. Hu, J., M. Nakatani, A. Garcia, T. Kuranouchi and T. Fujimura. 2003. Genetic analysis of sweetpotato and wild relative using Inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs). Breeding Science 53, 297-304 https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.53.297
  6. Jarret, R. L., L. C. Merrick, T. Holms, J. Evans and M. K. Aradhya. 1996. Simple sequence repeats in watermelon [(Citrullus lanatus (Thunb) Matsum. & Nakai]. Genome 40, 433-441
  7. Kim, D. H., G. Zur, Y. Danin-Poleg, S. W. Lee, K. B. Shim, C. W. Kang and Y. Kashi. 2002. Genetic relationships of sesame germplasm collection as revealed by inter- simple sequence repeats. Plant Breeding 121, 259-262 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00700.x
  8. Lee, S. J., J. S. Shin, K. W. Park and Y. P. Hong. 1996. Detection of genetic diversity using RAPD-PCR and sugar analysis in watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.] germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 719-725 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226094
  9. Nagaoka, T. and Y. Ogihara. 1997. Applicability of inter- simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94, 597-602 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050456
  10. Paris, H. S., N. Yonash, V. Portnoy, N. Mozes-Daube, G. Tzuri and N. Katzir. 2003. Assessment of genetic relationships in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) using DNA markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106, 971-978 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1157-0
  11. Prevost, A. and M. J. Wilkinson. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivar. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98, 107-112 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051046
  12. Rohlf, F. J. 2000, NTSYSpc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System- Version 2.10b. Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York
  13. Staub, J. E. and F. C. Serquen. 1996. Genetic markers, map construction, and their application in plant breeding. HortScience 31, 729-741
  14. Sneath, P. H. A. and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy : The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco

피인용 문헌

  1. Development of genetic marker specific for Korean hwanggi medicine (Radix Astragali) vol.20, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-011-0216-1
  2. Genome-wide analysis of sequence variations in eight inbred watermelon lines vol.43, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2016.43.2.164