Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

A Retrospective study on the survival rate of the sinus perforated implants

상악동을 천공한 임플란트의 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구

  • Lee, Jae-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Um, Heung-Sik (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Chang, Beom-Seok (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
  • 이재관 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 엄흥식 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 장범석 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Perforation of maxillary sinus is a common complication of implant placement in posterior maxilla. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of sinus perforated implants placed in partially edentulous maxillae. Eighteen sinus perforated implants in 15 patients were examined for cumulative survival rate, radiographic preoperative bone level, and radiographic marginal bone level change. Twenty-two non-perforated implants in the same patients served as control. The results were as follows; 1. There was no statistically significant difference in cumulative survival rate between sinus perforated implants and non-perforated implants (P>0.05). 2. There was no statistically significant difference in the marginal bone level between sinus perforated implants and non-perforated implants (P>0.05). 3. There was no statistically significant difference in cumulative survival rate according to the preoperative bone level (P>0.05). These results suggests that perforation of maxillary sinus may not affect implant success in posterior maxillae.

Keywords

References

  1. Noack N, Willer J, Hoffmann J. Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:748-755
  2. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L. et al. Osseointegmted oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-296 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287
  3. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus.anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantolgy-11 years of surgical experiance. J Oral Implantology 1990;16: 199-209
  4. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 1998;85:8-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  5. Jaffin RA, Bermann C. The excess loss of Br nemark fixtures in type N bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  6. Bahat O. Branemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2000;15:646-653
  7. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(Suppl.1):1--45
  8. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:303-311
  9. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolve E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75: 511-516 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511
  10. Jensen OT. The sinus bone graft. Quintessence Publishing Co, 1999:31-45
  11. 박원배. 상악동 골이식술의 임상적 평가 V. 월간 치과계. 2003;5:52-55
  12. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-146
  13. Misch CE. Division of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol 1990;7:9-17
  14. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of mono-and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants: a study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:229-235 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80036-1
  15. Bransmark PI, Adell R, Albektsson T. An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:497-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90008-9
  16. Van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants. Proceedings of the 3rd european workshop on peiodontology, Quintessence Publishing Co. 1999:242-254
  17. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. et al. A qualitative and quntitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Br nemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impalnts 1997;12:504-514
  18. Bain CA. Smoking and implant failure: benefits of a smoking cessation protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 756-759
  19. Granstrom G, Tjellstrom A. Effects of irradiation on osseointegration before and after implant placement: a report of three cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12: 547-551
  20. Wagner W, Esser E, Ostkamp K. Osseointegration of dental implants in patients with and without radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 1998;37:693-696 https://doi.org/10.1080/028418698430061
  21. Lazzara R, Siddiqui M, Binon P. et al. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a 5-year period. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7: 73-83 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070109.x
  22. Bruggenkate CMT, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, Krekeler G. Short(6-mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:791-798
  23. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92: 139-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.010
  24. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry, 2nd ed, Mosby. 1998:91-123
  25. Lum LB. A Biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:126-131
  26. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Anthony J. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillaryatrophy with implants. J Oral Maxilofac Surg 1994;52: 210-216 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90283-6
  27. Jensen J, Krantz Simonsen E, SindetPedersen S. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with bone grafting and osseointegrated implants: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxilofac Surg 1990;48:27-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90175-2
  28. Larheim TA, Eggen S. Measurements of alveolar bone height at tooth and implant abutments on intraoral radiographs. a comparison of reproducibility of Eggen technique utilized with and without bite imression. J Clin PeiodontoI 1982;9:184-192 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb02058.x
  29. Bragger D, B rgin W, Lang NP, Buser D. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri -implant bone density. Int. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991:6:160-166
  30. Fourmousis I, Bragger U. Radiologic interpretation of peri -implant structures. Proceedings of the 3rd european workshop on periodontology, Quintessence Publishing Co. 1999:228-241
  31. Albreksson T, Zarb GA, Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodontic 1993;6:95-105