DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flutter analysis of Stonecutters Bridge

  • Hui, Michael C.H. (Major Works Project Management Office, Highways Department) ;
  • Ding, Q.S. (State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering and Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Xu, Y.L. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
  • 투고 : 2005.04.07
  • 심사 : 2006.02.02
  • 발행 : 2006.04.25

초록

Stonecutters Bridge of Hong Kong is a cable-stayed bridge with two single-column pylons each 298 m high and an aerodynamic twin deck. The total length of the bridge is 1596 m with a main span of 1018 m. The top 118 m of the tower will comprise structural steel and concrete composite while the bottom part will be of reinforced concrete. The bridge deck at the central span will be of steel whilst the side spans will be of concrete. Stonecutters Bridge has adopted a twin-girder deck design with a wide clear separation of 14.3 m between the two longitudinal girders. Although a number of studies have been conducted to investigate the aerodynamic performance of twin-girder deck, the actual real life application of this type of deck is extremely limited. This therefore triggered the need for conducting the present studies, the main objective of which is to investigate the performance of Stonecutters Bridge against flutter at its in-service stage as well as during construction. Based on the flutter derivatives obtained from the 1:80 scale rigid section model experiment, flutter analysis was carried out using 3-D finite element based single parameter searching method developed by the second author of this paper. A total of 6 finite element models of the bridge covering the in-service stage as well as 5 construction stages were established. The dynamic characteristics of the bridge associated with these stages were computed and applied in the analyses. Apart from the critical wind speeds for the onset of flutter, the dominant modes of vibration participating in the flutter vibration were also identified. The results indicate that the bridge will be stable against flutter at its in-service stage as well as during construction at wind speeds much higher than the verification wind speed of 95 m/s (1-minute mean).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agar, T. A. (1989), 'Aerodynamic flutter analysis of suspension bridges by a modal technique', Eng. Struct., 75-82
  2. Bleich, F. (1948), 'Dynamic instability of truss-stiffened suspension bridges under wind action', Proc. ASCE, 74(7),1269-1314
  3. Boonyapinyo, V., Miyata, T., and Yamada, H., et al. (1999), 'Advanced aerodynamic analysis of suspension bridges by state-space approach', J. Struct. Eng.. ASCE, 125(12), 1357-1366
  4. Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000a), 'Aerodynamic coupling effects on flutter and buffeting of bridges', J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(1), 17-26 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(17)
  5. Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000b), 'Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges', J. Eng Mech., ASCE, 126(1), 7-16 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(7)
  6. Chen, X. and Kareem, A. (2003), 'New frontiers in aerodynamic tailoring of long span bridges: and advanced analysis framework', J. Wind Eng Ind. Aerodyn., 91(12-15), 1511-1528 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.005
  7. Chen, Z.Q. (1994), 'The three dimensional analysis and behaviors investigation on the critical flutter state of bridges', Proc. Symp. on Cable-stayed bridges, Shanghai, China
  8. Diana, G, Cheli, F, Zasso, A, and Bocciolone, M. (1999), 'Suspension bridge response to turbulent wind: Comparison of new numerical simulation method results with full scale data', Wind Engineering into the 21 Century, A Larsen, G.L. Larose and F.M. Livesey (eds), Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 871-878
  9. Ding, Q.S., Chen, A.R., and Xiang, H.E (2002), 'A state space method for coupled flutter analysis of long-span bridges', Struct. Eng. Mech., 14(4),491-504 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2002.14.4.491
  10. DMI (2001), 'Section Model Tests for Stonecutters Bridge', Hong Kong, AJ Section, DMI Report 2001197, Nov 2001
  11. Dung, N. N., Miyata, T, and Yamada, H., et al. (1998), 'Flutter responses in long span bridges with wind induced displacement by the mode tracing method', J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 78&79, 367-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00157-3
  12. Ge, Y. J. and Tanaka, H. (2000), 'Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches', J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 86, 123-153 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00007-6
  13. Jain, A, Jones, N.P., and Scanlan, R.H. (1996), 'Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(7), 716-725 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:7(716)
  14. Lin, Y.K., 'Motion of suspension bridges in turbulent wind', J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, 105(6), 1979
  15. Matsumoto, M., Shijo, R, and Eguchi, A, et al. (2004), 'On the flutter characteristics of separated two box girders', Wind and Struct., 7(4), 281-291 https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.4.281
  16. Miyata, T and Yamada, H. (1988), 'Coupled flutter estimate of a suspension bridge', Proc. Int. Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodyn. and Its Appl., Kyoto, 485-492
  17. Miyata, T, et al. (1994), 'New findings of coupled flutter in full model wind tunnel tests on the Akashi Kaiko Bridge', Proc. Symp. on Cable-stayed and Suspension Bridges, Deauvlille, France, 163-170
  18. Namini, A and Albrecht, P. (1992), 'Finite element-based flutter analysis of cable-suspended bridges', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 118(6), 1509-1526 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:6(1509)
  19. Ogawa, K., Shimodoi, H., and Oryu, T (2002), 'Aerodynamic characteristics of a 2-box girder section adaptable for a super-long span suspension bridge', J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 90(12-15), 2033-2043 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00319-7
  20. Sato, H., Kusuhara, S., Ogi, K., et al. (2000), 'Aerodynamic characteristics of super long-span bridges with slotted box girder', J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 88(2-3), 297-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00055-6
  21. Scanlan, R.H. (1978), 'The action of flexible bridges under wind, I: flutter theory,' J. Sound Vib., 60(2), 187-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80028-5
  22. Scanlan, R.H. and Lin, W. (1987), 'Effects of turbulence on bridge flutter derivatives', J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, 104(4), 719-733
  23. Scanlan, R.H. and Jones, N.P. (1990), 'Aeroelastic analysis of cable-stayed bridges', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 116(2), 229-297
  24. Scanlan, R.H. (1993), 'Problematic in formulation of wind-force model for bridge decks', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 119(7), 1433-1446
  25. Xiang, H., et al. (1996), 'Investigations on the wind-resisted behavior of Jiangyin Yangtse Suspension Bridge', Bulletin of Laboratory of Wind tunnel, SKLDRCE, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, China. (in Chinese)
  26. Xie, J. and Xiang, H. (1985), 'State-space method for 3-D flutter analysis of bridge structures', Proc. Asia Pacific Symp. on Wind Eng., India, 269-276

피인용 문헌

  1. PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE NATURAL EXCITATION TECHNIQUE (NExT) AND THE EIGENSYSTEM REALIZATION ALGORITHM (ERA) FOR MODAL IDENTIFICATION USING AMBIENT VIBRATION vol.35, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00643.x
  2. Stress-level buffeting analysis of a long-span cable-stayed bridge with a twin-box deck under distributed wind loads vol.127, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.050
  3. Full-bridge aeroelastic model wind tunnel tests for the Stonecutters Bridge vol.20, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/1023697X.2013.794554
  4. Numerical studies of the suppression of vortex-induced vibrations of twin box girders by central grids vol.26, pp.5, 2006, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2018.26.5.305
  5. Buffeting Analysis of Long-Span Bridges under Typhoon Winds with Time-Varying Spectra and Coherences vol.146, pp.12, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002835
  6. Aero-structural Optimization of Streamlined Twin-Box Deck Bridges with Short Gap Considering Flutter vol.26, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001705