DYNAMICS OF AN ACTIVELY GUIDED TRACK INSPECTION VEHICLE

  • Zeng, C.C. (School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University) ;
  • Bao, J.H. (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, J.W. (School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University) ;
  • Li, X.H. (School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University)
  • Published : 2006.12.01

Abstract

The lateral dynamic behaviours of a track inspection vehicle with laterally guided system are studied for the safety and comfort. A 10-DOF dynamic model is proposed counting for lateral and yaw motions. The equations for motions of the vehicle running on curved tracks at a constant speed are presented. It is shown by simulation that lateral guiding forces applied to the guiding wheels on the inner side of the track increase in a larger scale in comparison with those on the outer side when the vehicle passes through curved tracks with cant, and the front guiding spring forces is larger than the rears. Lateral vibrations due to yaw motions of the vehicle take place when the vehicle runs through curved tracks. Finally, effect of the lateral guidance on the vehicle dynamics is also examined and advantages of such a guiding system are discussed in some details. An optimal guided control is applied to restrain the lateral and yaw motions. The comparisons between the active and passive guidance explain the effect of the active control approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, B. K., Ryu, G. and Song, S. J. (2005). Control strategy of an active suspension for a half car model with preview information. Int. J. Automotive Technology 6, 3, 243-249
  2. Diana, G., Bruni, S., Cheli, F. and Resta, F. (2003). Active control of the running behaviour of a railway vehicle: Stability and curving performances. Vehicle System Dynamics, 37, Suppl., 157-170
  3. Dukkipati, R. V., Narayanaswamy, S. (1999). Performance of a rail car equipped with independently rotating wheelsets having yaw control. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F, J. Rail and Rapid Transit 213, 1, 31-38 https://doi.org/10.1243/0954409991531001
  4. Goda, K., Nishigaito, T., Hiraishi, M., and Iwasaki, K. (2000). A curving simulation for a monorail car. Proc. IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conf. New York, 171- 177
  5. Goodall, R. M. (1997). Active railway suspensions: implementation status and technological trends. Vehicle System Dynamics 28, 2/3, 87-117 https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119708969351
  6. Haug, E. J. (1989). Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical System. Allyn and Bacons, Inc., New York
  7. Mei, T. X. and Goodall, R. M. (2000). LQG and GA solutions for active steering of railway vehicles. IEE Proc. - Control Theory Appl. 147, 1, 111-117
  8. Tanifuji, K., Sato, T. and Goodall, R. (2003). Active steering of a rail vehicle with two-axle bogies based on wheelset motion. Vehicle System Dynamics 39, 4, 309- 327 https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.39.4.309.14150
  9. Tsunashima, H. (2003). Dynamics of automated guideway transit vehicle with single-axle bogies. Vehicle System Dynamics 39, 5, 365-397 https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.39.5.365.14146
  10. Yi, K. S. and Yi, S. J. (2005). Real-time simulation of a high speed multibody tracked vehicle. Int. J. Automotive Technology 6, 4, 351-357
  11. Youn, I., Lee, S. and Tomizuka, M. (2006). Optimal preview control of tracked vehicle suspension systems. International Journal of Automotive Technology 7, 4, 469-475