Bioequivalence Assessment of Roxithromycin Tablets in Healthy Korean Volunteers

  • Kwon Oh-Seung (Bioanalysis and Biotransformation Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Kim Hye-Jung (Bioanalysis and Biotransformation Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Pyo Hee-Soo (Bioanalysis and Biotransformation Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Chung Youn-Bok (National Research Lab (NRL) of PK/PD, College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University)
  • Published : 2006.03.01

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the bioequivalency between the $Rozid^{TM}$ Tablet (Ilhwa Pharm. Co., Ltd.) as a test formulation and the $Rulid^{TM}$ Tablet (Handok Pharm. Co., Ltd) as a reference formulation. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were administered the formulations by the randomized Latin square crossover design, and the plasma samples were determined by a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detector. $AUC_t,\;C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ were obtained from the time-plasma concentration curves, and log-transformed $AUC_t\;and\;C_{max}$ and log-untransformed $T_{max}$ values for two formulations were compared by statistical tests and analysis of variation. $AUC_t$ was determined to be $63.30{\pm}25.57{\mu}g.hr/ml$ for the test formulation and $64.02{\pm}29.27mg.hr/ml$ for the reference formulation. The mean values of $C_{max}$ for the test and reference formulations were $5.07{\pm}2.14\;and\;5.53{\pm}2.60{\mu}g/ml$, respectively. The $AUC_t,\;and\;C_{max}$ ratios of the test $Rozid^{TM}$ Tablet to the reference $Rulid^{TM}$ Tablet were -1.12% and -8.32%, respectively, showing that the mean differences were satisfied the acceptance criteria within 20%. The results from analysis of variance for log-transformed $AUC_t,\;and\;C_{max}$ indicated that sequence effects between groups were not exerted and 90% confidence limits of the mean differences for $AUC_t,\;and\;C_{max}$ were located in ranges from log 0.80 and log 1.25, satisfying the acceptance criteria of the KFDA bioequivalence. The RozidTM Tablet as the test formulation was considered to be bioequivalent to the RulidTM Tablet used as its reference formulation, based on $AUC_t,\;and\;C_{max}$ values.

Keywords

References

  1. D.J. Birkett, R.A. Robson, N. Grgurinovich, and A. Tonkin (1990). Single oral dose pharmacokinetics of erythromycin and roxithromycin and the effects of chronic dosing, Ther. Drug. Monit., 12 (1), 65-71 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199001000-00012
  2. M.J. Ptacek and J. Klima (1999). Determination of roxithromycin in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with spectrophotometric detection, J. Chromatogr. B. Biomed. Sci. Appl. 723 (1-2), 233-238 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00528-3
  3. M.J. Gonzalez de la Huebra, U. Vincent, G. Bordin and A.R. Rodriguez (2005). Determination of macrolide antibiotics in porcine and bovine urine by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to coulometric detection, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 382 (2), 433-439 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2951-0
  4. M.J. Gonzalez de la Huebra, G. Bordin and A.R. Rodriguez(2003). Comparative study of coulometric and amperometric detection for the determination of macrolides in human urine using high-performance liquid chromatography, Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 375 (8), 1031-1037 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1801-9
  5. A. Pappa-Louisi, A. Papageorgiou, A. Zitrou, S. Sotiropoulos, E. Georgarakis, and F. Zougrou (2001). Study of the electrochemical detection of the macrolide antibiotics clarithromycin and roxithromycin in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 755 (1-2), 57-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00472-2
  6. C. Taninaka, H. Ohtani, E. Hanada, H. Kotaki, H. Sato, and T. Iga (2000). Determination of erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and azithromycin in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection, J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 738 (2), 405-411 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(99)00512-5
  7. F. Kees, S. Spangler and M. Wellenhofer (1998). Determination of macrolides in biological matrices by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection, J. Chromatogr. A, 812 (1-2), 287-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00404-X
  8. H.G. Fouda and R.P. Schneider (1995). Quantitative determination of the antibiotic azithromycin in human plasma by highperformance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry: correlation with a standard HPLC electrochemical method, Ther. Drug Monit., 17 (2), 179-183 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199504000-00013
  9. P. Edder, L. Coppex, A. Cominoli, and C. Corvi (2002). Analysis of erythromycin and oleandomycin residues in food by highperformance liquid chromatography with fluorometric detection, Food Addit. Contam., 19 (3), 232-240 https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030110083702
  10. J. Sastre Torano and H.L. Guchelaar (1998). Quantitative determination of the macrolide antibiotics erythromycin, roxithromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography using pre-column derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride and fluorescence detection, J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 720 (1-2), 89-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00448-4
  11. W. Xiao, B. Chen, S. Yao and Z. Cheng (2005). Simultaneous determination of erythromycin propionate and base in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 817 (2), 153-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.11.055
  12. M.J. Hilton and K.Y. Thomas (2003). Determination of selected human pharmaceutical compounds in efflent and surface water samples by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1015 (1-2), 129-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(03)01259-7
  13. C.C. Lai, P.L. Tsai, C. Yu and G.R. Her (2000). Analysis of a commercial preparation of erythromycin estolates by tandem mass spectrometry and high performance liquid chromatography/ electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry using an ion trap mass spectrometer, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 14 (6), 468-475 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(20000331)14:6<468::AID-RCM897>3.0.CO;2-4
  14. L. Shargel and A.B.C. Yu (1993). Chapter 10. Bioavailability and bioequivalence. In: Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, 3 rd Ed., p.193, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, USA
  15. D.J. Schuirrnann (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability, J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 15, 657- 680 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419
  16. Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA; Nov 22, 2002a). Standard protocol for the criteria of bioequivalence test, KFDA Notification No. 2002-60
  17. Y.J. Lee, Y.G. Kim, M.G. Lee, S.J. Chung, M.H. Lee and C.K. Shim (2000). Analysis of bioequivalence study using log-transformed model, Yakhakhoji, 44, 308-314
  18. Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA; Nov. 22, 2002b), Standard protocol for regulations of bioequivalence test, KFDA Notification No. 2002-61