References
- 권성기 (1987). 대학생의 운동학 그래프 작성에 대한 역학 개념의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(4), 383-393
- 김태선 (1998). 고등학생들의 과학 관련 그래프 해석 능력. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문
- 김태선, 고수경, 김범기 (2005). 고등학생들의 그래프 능력과 과학 탐구 능력 및 과학 학업 성취도의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지. 25(5), 624-633
- 김태선, 김범기 (2002). 중고등학생들의 과학 그래프 작성 및 해석 능력. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(4), 768-778
- 김태선, 김범기 (2005). 과학관련 선 그래프를 해석하는 고등학생들의 발성사고 과정 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(2)
- 김태선, 배덕진, 김범기 (2002). 중학생의 그래프 능력과 논리적 사고력 및 과학 탐구 능력의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(4), 725-739
- 문충식, 김범기 (1998). 선 그래프 해석과 이해의 지각 . 인지 과정에 관한 모형-힘과 운동 관련 선 그래프를 중심으로-. 물리교육, 16(2), 72-82
- Aubrecht G. U., & Aubrecht, U. (1983). Constructing objective tests. American Journal of Physics, 51, 613-620
- Barclay, W. L. (1986). Graphing misconceptions and possible remedies using microcomputer-based labs. Paper presented at the 1986 National Educational Computing Conference, San Diego, CA
- Beichner, R. J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 803-815
- Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750-762
- Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps (W,J. Berg, Trans.), Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
- Brasell, H. M. (1987). Effectiveness of a microcomputer-based laboratory in learning distance and velocity graphs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida
- Brasell, H. M. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 385-395
- Brasell, H. M. (1990), Graphs, Graphing, and Graphers. In M. B. Rowe(Ed.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher, 6, 69-85. Washington, D.C: National Science Teachers Association
- Brasell, H. M., & Rowe, M. B. (1993), Graphing skills among high school physics students. School Science and Mathematics, 93(2), 63-70
- Fisher, M. A. (1992). Categorization, or schema selection in graph comprehension. A Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA
- Kim, T., & Kim, B. (2005). Analysis of interpretation processes through readers' thinking aloud in science-related line graphs. Journal of Korean Association of Science Education, 25(2)
- Kim, T., & Beichner, R. J. (2005). Cognitive processes in interpretation of kinematics graphs. Paper presented at the American Association of Physics Teachers (130th)
- Kim, Tae Sun & Kim, Beom-Ki, (2002). Fosirg students cognitive processes for the line graph. An oral presented at the American Association of Physics Teachers(125th)
- Kim, Tae Sun & Kim, Beom-Ki. (2005). Number and type of spontaneous sentences as high-scool students interpret line graphs representing physics information. Journal of the Korean Physical Societym 47(6)
- Kim, Tae Sun & Kim, Beom-Ki, (2002). Secondary students cognitive processes for the line graph from graph components. Paper presented at the Physics Education Research of American Association of Physics Teachers(125th)
- Kim, Tae Sun, Kim, Eun-Mi, & Kim, Beam-Ki. (2002). Students' reading order and viewing time in the line graph. Proceedings of selected research papers presented at the International Conference on Physics Education in Cultural Contexts
- Kim, Tae Sun, Jina, & Kim, Beom-Ki. (2005). Interpretation abilities of american and korean students in kinematics graphs. Journal of Korean Association of Science Education, 25(6). 671-677
- Linn, M. C., & Layman, J. W. (1987). Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development. Comtemporary Educational Psychology 12, 244-253
- Lohse, G. L. (1993). A cogrutive model for understanding graphical perception, Human - Computer Interaction 8, 353-388
- McDermott, L. C, & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Investigation of student difficulties with graphical representations in physics. Paper presented at the Second International Seminar in Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Ithaca, NY
- McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the test of graphing in science (TOGS). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 571- 580
- Mokros, J. R, & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer - based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 369-383
- Pinker, S. (1983). Pattern Perception and the Comprehension of Graphs, National Institute of Education Rept. 1-46
- Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530-535
- Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M, & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 977-1019
- Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999b). Digitising lizards or the topology of vision in ecological fieldwork. Social Studies of Science, 29
- Schnotz, W., & Kulhary, R. W. (1994) Comprehension of Graphics. North-Holland Elsevier Science B. V. The Netherlands
- Schultz, K., Clement, J., & Mokros, J. (1986). Adolescents' graphing skills: A descriptive analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA
- Shah, P. (1995). Cognitive processes in graph comprehension, Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie - mellon university (UMI Dissertation services NO. 9622441)
- Shaw, E. L., Padilla, M. J., & McKenzie, D. L. (1983). An examination of the graphing abilities of students in grades seven through twelve. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas
- Wavering, M. J. (1989). Logical reasoning necessary to make line graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(5), 373-379