한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제26권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-8
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

동기 및 인지 변인이 화학 선다형 수리 문제 해결에 미치는 영향: 성취 목적, 유능감, 학습 전략, 자기 조절 능력

The Impact of Motivational and Cognitive Variables on Multiple-Choice Algorithmic Chemistry Problem Solving: Achievement Goal, Perceived Ability, Learning Strategy, and Self-Regulation

  • 발행 : 2006.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 고등학교 학생들의 성취 목적(과제지향/수행 지향/수행 회피), 유능감 등의 동기 변인과 학습 전략(심층적/피상적), 자기 조절 능력 등의 인지 변인 및 화학 선다형 수리 문제 해결력 사이의 인과관계를 경로 분석을 통해 조사하였다. 연구 결과, 유능감과 과제 지향 목적은 자기 조절 능력을 통하여 화학 수리 문제 해결력에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤으며, 특히 유능감은 인지 변인을 경유하지 않고도 직접적으로 화학 수리 문제 해결력에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 조사되었다. 인지 변인 중 심층적 학습 전략은 유능감과 과제 지향 목적의 영향을 받았고 피상적 학습 전략은 수행 회피 목적의 영향을 받았으나, 이러한 학습 전략과 화학 수리 문제 해결력 사이에는 인과관계가 존재하지 않았다.

This study investigated the causal relationships between high school student multiple-choice algorithmic chemistry problem solving and 1) the motivational variables of achievement goal (task goal/performance goal/performance-avoidance) and perceived ability, and 2) the cognitive variables of learning strategy (deep learning/surface learning) and self-regulation. Path analysis supported a causal model in which perceived ability and task goal were found to positively influence algorithmic chemistry problem-solving ability via self-regulation. In particular it was found that perceived ability directly influenced algorithmic chemistry problem-solving ability. Moreover, deep learning was found to have been influenced by perceived ability and task goal, while surface learning was influenced by performance-avoidance goal. Lastly, there did not appear to be any causal relationship between learning strategy and algorithmic chemistry problem-solving ability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 노태희, 전경문 (1997). 물질의 분자 수준을 시각적으로 강조하는 4단계 문제 해결식 수업이 학생의 개념과 문제 해결 능력에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(3), 313-321
  2. 노태희, 전경문, 최용남 (1997), 중등학생의 과학 학습 동기와 태도, 성취 욕구, 학습 전략 사이의 관계성 조사. 대한화학회지, 24(5), 280-286
  3. 노태희, 한재영, 김창민, 전경문 (2000). 화학 문제 해결력과 인지적, 정의적 변인사이의 관계. 대한화학회지, 44(1), 68-73
  4. 이명자 (1997). 자기 조절 학습전략 훈련이 아동의 문제 해결력과 자기 효능감에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대 학교석사학위논문
  5. Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. I. (1994). Motivational and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 811-831 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310103
  6. Bandura, A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretice-Hall
  7. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancy, value, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and social approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman
  8. Entwistle, N., Tait, H, & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualization of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development
  9. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192 https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0001
  10. Gregorie, M., Ashton, P., & Algina, .I. (2001). The role of prior and perceived ability in influencing the relationship of goal orientation to cognitive engagement and academic achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA
  11. Hau, K. T., & Hui, H. F (1996). Theories of intelligence, achievement goals and learning strategies of chinese students. Parer presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, OT
  12. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M (1998). Fit indices in oovariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453
  13. Lyle, K. S., & Robinson, W. R (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(9), 1162-1163
  14. Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A schcolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26(4), 399-427
  15. Malpass, J. R. (1994). A structural model of self-regulation, goal orientation, self -efficacy, worry, and math achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles: University of Southern California
  16. Meece, J. L., & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students' achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582-590
  17. Meece, J. L., & Jones, M. G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science: Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 393-406
  18. Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A, Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 388-422 https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0001
  19. Pintrich, P. R, & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40
  20. Seo, D., & Kim, J. H. (2001). Expanding a goal mediational model: The Korean elementary school math class, Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(3), 177-183
  21. Simpson, D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740102
  22. Smith, M. U, & Good, R (1984). Problem solving and classical genetics: Successful versus unsuccessful performance, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(9), 895-912 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210102
  23. Taconis, R, Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M, & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442-468
  24. Vandewalle, D. (1997). Developrnent and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-10 15
  25. Veroff, J. (1969). Social comparison and the development of achievement motivation. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children (pp. 46-101). New York: Russell Sage Foundation
  26. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339