DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Site Classification System and Modification of Design Response Spectra considering Geotechnical Site Characteristics in Korea (I) - Problem Statements of the Current Seismic Design Code

국내 지반특성에 적합한 지반분류 방법 및 설계응답스펙트럼 개선에 대한 연구 (I) - 국내 내진설계기준의 문제점 분석

  • 윤종구 (한국유지관리(주) 지반설계사업부) ;
  • 김동수 (한국고학기술원 건설및환경공학과) ;
  • 방은석 (한국고학기술원 건설및환경공학과)
  • Published : 2006.04.30

Abstract

Site response analyses were peformed based on equivalent linear technique using the shear wave velocity profiles of 162 sites collected around the Korean Peninsula. The she characteristics, particularly the shear wave velocities and the depth to bedrock, are compared to those in the western United States. The site coefficients of short period $(F_a)$ and the long period $(F_v)$ obtained from this study were significantly different compared to 1997 Uniform Building Code (1997 UBC). $F_a$ underestimated the motion in shot period ranges and $F_v$ overestimated the motion in mid period ranges in Korean seismic guideline. It is found that the existing Korean seismic design code were is required to be modified considering geological site conditions in Korea for the reliable estimation of sue amplification. Problems of the current seismic design code were dicussed in this paper and the development of site classification method and modification of desing response spectra were discussed in the companion papers(II-Development of Site Classification System and III-Modification of Dosing Response Specra).

본 논문에서는 국내 162개 지반에 대한 전단파속도 주상도, 기반암 깊이 및 지반의 동적변형특성을 획득하여 등가선형해석을 수행한 후 미국 서부해안지역의 지반 특성과 비교 검토하였다. 검토 결과 국내의 일반적인 특성을 가지는 지반과 미국 서부해안지역의 지반은 기반암 깊이와 고유주기가 매우 다름을 확인하였다. 지진응답 해석 결과 단주기 증폭계수 $F_a$의 경우 1997 UBC 기준의 값보다 크게 산정되었고, 장주기 증폭계수 $F_v$는 작게 나타나 국내 지반특성에 적합한 증폭계수는 현재 국내 내진설계기준 값과는 매우 다른 경향을 보였다. 따라서, 증폭계수를 재산정하고 설계응답스펙트럼을 개선해야 할 필요성을 확인하였다. 본 논문에서는 현재 이용되고 있는 내진설계기준과 국내 지반특성과의 차이점 파악에 중점을 두었고, 개선방법에 대한 내용은 동반논문(II 지반분류 개선방법, III 설계응답스펙트럼 개선방법)에서 심도있게 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부, 내진설계 기준 연구(II), 1997
  2. NEHRP, Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA 302/303, February, Part 1. (Provisions) and Part. 2(Commentary)., 1997
  3. ICBO, 1997 Uniform building code, Volume 2 - Structural engineering design provisions, Interna- tional Conference of Building Officials, 1997, 492pp
  4. 윤종구, 김동수, '국내 지반 특성에 적합한 설계지반운동 결정 방법에 대한 연구', 한국지진공학회논문집, 제8권 제3호, 2004, pp. 23-32
  5. MCEER-99-0010, Site Factors and Site Categories in Seismic Codes, Ricardo Dobry, Ricardo Ramos and Maurice S, Power. July 19, 1999
  6. Bardet, J.P., Nielsen, E., Villacorta, R., ROSRINE data dissemination, http://geoinfo.usc.edu/rosrine, Accessed 12 June 2001
  7. Sun, C.G .. 'Geotechnical information system and site amplification characteristics for earthquake ground motions at inland of the Korean Peninsula,' Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul Nation University, Feb, 2004
  8. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html
  9. Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H. B(1972), 'SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites,' Report EERC 72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1972
  10. Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J. I., User's manual for SHAKE91 : A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, University of California, Davis, 1992, 13pp
  11. 김동수, 추연욱, '공진주시험을 이용한 국내 비점성토지반의 동적변형특성', 한국지반공학회 논문집, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2001, pp. 115-128
  12. Dobry, R. and Martin, G. 'Development of Site-Dependent Ratio of Elastic Response Spectra (RRS),' Proceeding of the Workshop on Earthquake Site Response and Seismic Code Provisions, 1999

Cited by

  1. Analysis on Impact Factors of Open-cut Type Excavation Work using Numerical Analysis Method vol.12, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12814/jkgss.2013.12.3.043
  2. Assessment of Response Spectrum by Dynamic Centrifuge Test for the Pile Foundation into the Sand vol.5, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2014.5.1.035