한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지

대학도서관의 환경변화와 문제점의 분석 - 미국, 영국, 호주 및 캐나다를 중심으로 -

An Analysis of the Environmental Change and Problems in Academic Libraries: Cases of the U.S., U.K., Australia and Canada

  • 곽동철 (청주대학교 인문대학 문화정보학부 문헌정보학) ;
  • 김기래 (부산대학교 도서관) ;
  • 윤정옥 (청주대학교 인문대학 문화정보학부 문헌정보학)
  • 발행 : 2006.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 1990년대 이후 미국, 영국, 호주 및 캐나다 등 영어권 주요국가의 대학도서관들이 인식하고 있는 고등교육의 환경변화와 그에 따른 문제점들을 살펴보는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 각기 상이한 국가제도와 문화적 전통, 고등교육체제 및 정보환경 하에 있기 때문에 생겨나는 고유한 문제점들보다는 여러 나라의 대학도서관 전반에 나타나는 공통적인 문제점들을 규명하는 데 초점을 맞추었다. 각국의 대학도서관들이 공통적으로 지적하는 문제들은 예산의 축소 도서관 역할의 변화, 도서관 콜렉션 속성의 변화, 정보기술의 발전과 기술 기반구조의 요구, 연속간행물 가격의 급등과 도서관 구매력 감소 등이다. 이 문제들은 서로 고립된 개별적 문제들이 아니라, 매우 긴밀하게 상호 연관되어 있어, 개별 도서관의 대응책보다는 국가 혹은 정부의 보다 거시적이며 광범한 차원의 이해와 전략적 대책을 요구함을 알 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to describe the problems. which academic libraries in the V.S., U.K., Australia, and Canada have faced since the 1990s. These problems are mostly caused by environmental changes in higher education. In this study, only discussed are the problems that academic libraries in various countries have commonly experienced. but not unique ones libraries in each country has due to its own national, societal, cultural, academic or informational situations. Major problems include continuing decrease in library expenditures, changing role of libraries themselves. changing nature of library collections, development of information technology and technological Infrastructure on campus, steep increase in prices of scholarly journals, and relative decrease in purchasing powers of libraries. These Problems are all closely inter-related, and seem to require more comprehensive and systematic strategic solutions carried out by the national or government intervention, rather than individual libraries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper.Canberra: Department for Education. pp.14-15. 'online' [cited 2005.9.28]: Australian Vice-chancellors'Committee(AVCC), The Council of Australia's University Presidents. 2002. 'The Way Forward' HigherEducation Action Plan for the Information Economy.'
  2. 곽동철, 윤정옥, 김기태. 2005. 대학도서관 정책 로드맵에 관한 연구. 서울: 교육인적자원부(도서관 정책 연구 : 2005-6)
  3. Albanese. Andrew Richard. 2003. 'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43
  4. University of California University Librarians and the Office of Systemwide Library Planning. 2004. 'Systemwide Strategic Directions for Libraries and Scholarly Information at the University of California: Prepared for the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee. (http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu> 'online' 'cited 2005.8.26'
  5. United Kingdom. Dept. of Education and Skills(DFES) . 2004. 'Department for Education and Skills: FiveYear Strategy for Children and Learners: Presented to Parliament, by the Secretary of State for Educationand Skills, by Command of Her Majesty.' July 2004. [online] [cited 2005.8.28]
  6. 영국 고등학교에서 최근에 인정하기 시작한 새로운 자격 과정. 주로 직업교육에 초점을 맞추고 있음.
  7. Dolphin, Philippa. and Brophy, Peter. 2002. 'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254.
  8. Steele, Colin. 2000. Library and Information Infrastructure: International Strategic Initiatives: A DiscussionPaper. Prepared for the Coalition for Innovation in Scholarly Communication [online] [cited 2005.10.1]
  9. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper. Canberra:Department for Education. pp.14-15. [online] [cited 2005.9.28]
  10. Australian Vice-chancellors' Committee(AVCC), The Council of Australia's University Presidents. 2002'The Way Forward>>> Higher Education Action Plan for the InformationEconomy.'
  11. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper.Canberra: Department for Education. pp.14-15. 'online' [cited 2005.9.28]: Australian Vice-chancellors'Committee(AVCC), The Council of Australia's University Presidents. 2002. 'The Way Forward' HigherEducation Action Plan for the Information Economy.'
  12. Austen, Gaynor, et al. 2002. 'Australian University Libraries and the New Educational Environment.' Journalof Academic Librananship, 28(1/2): 63-6
  13. Council of Ministers of Education of Canada. 1997. 'Developments in Information Technologie in Education.
  14. Statistics Canada. 2003. Education Indicators in Canada: Report of the Pan-Canadian Education IndicatorsProgram(PCEIP). 2003. Toronto. Ontario: co-published by [online] [cited 2005.11.19]
  15. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. 2002. Trends in Higher Education: Summary of Findings.
  16. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. November 2003. The GATS and Higher Education inCanada: An Update on Canada's Position and Implications for Canadian Universities. [online] [cited 2005.11.24]
  17. Kyrillidou, and Young. 2004. 전게자료.. Table 4. 'Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986-2004. MedianValues for Time-Series Trends - Unadjusted dollar figures.
  18. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002. 'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25]
  19. Jordan, Jay. 2003. 'Cooperating During Difficult Times.' Journal of Academic Librarianship. 29(6): 343-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2003.08.001
  20. Brewer, Joseph M., et al. 2004. 'Libraries Dealing with the Future Now.' ARL Bimonthly Report. 234. [online] [cited 2005.8.29]
  21. 'The Follett Report. 1993.' Joint Funding Council's Libranes Review Group: Report. December 1993. AReport for Higher Education Funding Council for England, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council,Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Department of Education for Northern Ireland.
  22. Creaser, Claire, Maynard, Sally, and White. Sonya. 2004. LISU Annual Library Statistics 2004: FeaturingTrend Analysis of UK Public and Academic Libraries 1993-2003. Loughborough: LISU. [online] [cited 2005.11.4]
  23. LISU. 2004. 전게자료.
  24. Australian Library and Information Association(ALIA). 2002. 'Federal Budget 2002.' [online] [cited 2005. 9.27]
  25. Australian Library and Information Association(ALIA). 2005. 'Federal Budget 2004.' [online] [cited 2005. 9.27]
  26. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper. CanberraDepartment for Education. pp.14-15. [online] [cited 2005.9.28]
  27. Commonwealth of Australia(COA). 2002. Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper. CanberraDepartment for Education. pp.14-15. [online] [cited 2005.9.28], 'h. allocation of public subsidies', p.34
  28. ARL. 2005. 'Expenditure Trends in Canadian ARL Institutions. 1986-2004: Median Values for Time-SeriesTrend.' [online] [cited 2005.11.26]
  29. U.S. Dept. of Education, 2005. National Center for Education Statistics. The Conditions of Education,2001-2005. 1. Participation in Education. Undergraduate Education. Past and Projectd UndergraduateEnrollment. [online] [2005.11.1]
  30. Dolphin and Brophy. 2002.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00311-7
  31. The Follett Report. 2002.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00311-7
  32. LISU. 2004. 전게자료
  33. Albanese. 2003. 'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43
  34. University of California University Librarians and the Office of Systemwide Library Planning. 2004.'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25]
  35. Dolphin and Brophy. 2002. 'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00311-7
  36. The Follett Report. 1993.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254.
  37. Dolphin and Brophy. 2002.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00311-7
  38. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002.'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25]
  39. CARL. 2005. 'Towards an Integrated Knowledge Ecosystem: A Canadian Research Strategy.' A ReportSubmitted to the Canadian Association of Research Libraries / L'Association des bibliotheques de recherche du Canada(CARL/ABRC). [online] [cited 2005.11.26]
  40. Albanese. 2003.'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43
  41. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002. 'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25]
  42. Breeding. Marshall. 2004. 'Integrated Library Software: A Guide to Multiusers, Multifunction Systems.'Library Technology Reports. 40(1): 1-88.
  43. University of California. Systemwide Library Planning, May 15, 2002.'The Crisis of Library Sustainability,the Opportunities of Digital Scholarly Communication, and the University of California Strategy:Background Paper for the Joint Meeting of the Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee and the Standing Committee on Copyright, May 23. 2002.' [online] [cited 2005,8.25]
  44. U.S. Dept. of Education, 2005. National Center for Education Statistics. The Conditions of Education2001-2005. 5. Contexts of Secondary Education. College Resources: Electronic Services in Academic Library.
  45. Albanese. 2003. 'The Top Seven Academic Library issues.' Library Journal, 128(5): 43
  46. EdNA Reference Committee. 1999. Education and Training Action Plan for the Information Economy:Report to the Australian Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth AffairsMCEETYA.
  47. Austen, et al. 2002.
  48. The Follett Report. 1993.'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254.
  49. LISU. 2004. 전게자료.
  50. The Follett Report. 1993. 'Developments in the UK.' Journal of Academic Librananship,28(4): 251-254.
  51. LISU 2004. 전게자료.
  52. ARL. 2005. 'Monographs and Serials Expenditures in Canadian ARL Institutions,1986-2004.'
  53. Steele. 2000. Library and Information Infrastructure: International Strategic Initiatives: A DiscussionPaper. Prepared for the Coalition for Innovation in Scholarly Communication [online] [cited 2005.10.1]
  54. Australian Library and Information Association(ALIA). 2002. Higher Education Review: Submission 352.
  55. Houghton, John. Economics of Scholarly Communication. A Discussion Paper. Prepared for The Coalitionfor Innovation in Scholar Communication, pp. 29-34. Victoria University, Center for Strategic EconomicStudies.
  56. The Higher Education Consultancy Group and CHEMS Consulting. January 2002. A Report to the RSLP on: Barriers to Resource Sharing Among Higher Education Libraries.
  57. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD). 2004. Working Party on the InformationEconomy. Digital Broadband Content Panel and Government Discussion Session, 3 June 2004: Summaryand Conclusions. 38p
  58. The Higher Education Consultancy Group and CHEMS Consulting. January 2002. A Report to the RSLPon: Barriers to Resource Sharing Among Higher Education Libraries.
  59. LISU. 2004. 전게자료
  60. Canadian Library Association. 2001. "CLA Submisssion to the House of Commons Finance Committee [online] [cited 2005.11.26]
  61. Canadian Library Associaton. November 21, 2001. 'CLA launches Campaign for Canada's Libraries.'
  62. U.K. House Commons. Science and Technology committee. 2004. Scientific Publications: Free for All?Tenth Report of Session. 2003-04. Volume 1: Report. HC 399-1. London: The Stationary Office LimitedJuly 2004.