DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alternative Capturability Analysis of PN Laws


초록

The Lyapunov stability theory has been known inadequate to prove capturability of guidance laws because the equations of motion resulted from the guidance laws do not have the equilibrium point. By introducing a proper transformation of the range state, the original equations of motion for a stationary target can be converted into nonlinear equations with a specified equilibrium subspace. Physically, the equilibrium subspace denotes the direction of missile velocity to the target. By using a single Lyapunov function candidate, capturability of several PN laws for a stationary target is then proved for examples. In this approach, there is no assumption of the constant speed missile. The proposed method is expected to provide a unified and simplified scheme to prove the capturability of various kinds of guidance laws.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Guelman, M., 'Qualitative Study of Proportional Navigation', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-7, No.4, 1971, pp. 637-643 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1971.310406
  2. Guelman, M., The Closd-Form solution of the True Proportional Navigation', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-12, No.4, 1976, pp. 472-482 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1976.308328
  3. Becker, K., 'Closed-Form Solution of Pure Proportional Navigation', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 26, No.3, 1990, pp. 526-533 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.106131
  4. Shukla, U. S., and Mahapatra, P. R., 'The Proportional Navigation Dilemma-Pure or True?', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 26, No.2, 1990, pp, 382-392 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.53445
  5. Yang, C.-D., Yeh, F.-B., and Chen, J.-H., 'The Closed-form Solution of Generalized Proportional Navigation', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1987, pp. 216-218 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20205
  6. Yuan, P.-J., and Chern, J.-S., 'Solutions of True Proportional Navigation for Maneuvering and Nonmaneuvering Targets', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 15, No.1, 1992, pp. 268-271 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20828
  7. Song, S. H., and Ha, I. J., 'A Lyapunov-Like Approach to Performance Analysis of 3-Dimensional Pure PNG Laws', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 30, No.3, 1994, pp. 238-248 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.250424
  8. Ghawghawe, S. N., and Goshe, D., 'Pure Proportional Navigation Against Time-Varying Target Maneuvers', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 32, No.4, 1996, pp. 1336-1347 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.543854
  9. Oh, J. H., and Ha, I. J. 'Capturability of the 3-Dimensional Pure PNG Law', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 35, No.2, 1999, pp. 491-503 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.766931
  10. Chakravarthy, A., and Goshe, D., 'Capturability of Realistic Generalized True Proportional Navigation', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1996, pp. 407-418 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1996.543875
  11. Bryson, A. E. Jr., and Ho, Y. C., Applied Optimal Control, Washington, DC, Hemisphere, 1975, pp. 154-155
  12. Guelman, M., and Shinar, J., 'Optimal Guidance Law in the Plane', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 7, No.4, pp. 471-476, 1984 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.19880
  13. Guelman, M., Idan, M., and Golan, O. M., 'Three-Dimensional Minimum Energy Guidance', IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 31, No.2, 1995, pp. 835-841 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.381933
  14. Cho, H., Ryoo, C. K., and Tahk, M. J, 'Closed-Form Optimal Guidance Law for Missiles of Time-Varying Velocity', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 19, No.5, 1996, pp. 1017-1022 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21740
  15. Ben-Asher, J. Z., and Yaesh, I., Advances in Missile Guidance Theory, Vol. 180, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA Inc., 1998
  16. Ryoo, C. K., Cho, H., and Tahk, M. J., 'Closed-Form Solutions of Optimal Guidance with Terminal Impact Angle Constraint', Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Int'l Conference on Control Application, Istanbul, Turkey, June 2003, pp. 504-509
  17. Slotine, J.-J. E., and Li, W., Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice-Hall, 1991
  18. Vidyasagar, M., Nonlinear Systems Analysis, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, 1993
  19. Khalil, H. K., Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, 2002
  20. Kim, Y. H., Ryoo, C. K., and Tahk, M. J., 'Survivability Enhanced 3-D Biased Proportional Navigation Guidance Law', Proceedings of the 17th Int'l Aircraft Symposium of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences(JSASS), Nagano, Japan, Oct. 2003. pp. 107-111
  21. Etkin, B., Dynamics of Atmospheric Flight, John-Wiley & Sons, 1972
  22. Imado, F., and Uehara, S., 'High-g Barrel Roll Maneuvers Against Proportional Navigation from Optimal Control Viewpoint', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No.6, 1998, pp. 876-881 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4194
  23. Ryoo, C. K., Whang, I. H., and Tahk, M. J, '3-D Evasive Maneuver Policy for Anti-Ship Missiles against Close-In Weapon Systems', Proceedings of the 2003 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA 2003-5653, Austin, USA, Aug. 2003
  24. Cho, S. B., Ryoo, C. K., and Tahk, M. J, '3-D optimal evasion of air-to-surface missiles against proportionally navigated defense missiles', Proceedings of the Int'l Conference on Control, Automation and Systems(ICCAS) 2003, Gyeongju, Korea, Oct. 2003, pp. 514-518.