Radio Frequency Ablation in the Rabbit Lung Using Wet Electrodes: Comparison of Monopolar and Dual Bipolar Electrode Mode

  • Jin, Gong-Yong (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clincal Medicine) ;
  • Park, Sang-Hee (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clincal Medicine) ;
  • Han, Young-Min (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clincal Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Gyung-Ho (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clincal Medicine) ;
  • Kwak, Hyo-Sung (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clincal Medicine) ;
  • Jeon, Soo-Bin (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clincal Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Chul (Department of internal Medicin, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clincal Medicine)
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of radio frequency ablation (RFA) on the dimensions of radio frequency coagulation necrosis in a rabbit lung using a wet electrode in monopolar mode with that in dual electrode bipolar mode at different infusion rates (15 mm/hr versus 30 ml/hr) and saline concentrations (0.9% normal versus 5.8% hypertonic saline). Materials and Methods: Fifty ablation zones (one ablation zone in each rabbit) were produced in 50 rabbits using one or two 16-guage wet electrodes with a 1em active tip. The RFA system used in the monopolar and dual electrode wet bipolar RFA consisted of a 375-kHz generator (Elektrotom HiTT 106, Berchtold, Medizinelektronik, Germany). The power used was 30 watts and the exposure time was 5 minutes. The rabbits were assigned to one of five groups. Group A (n=10) was infused with 0.9% NaCl used at a rate of 30ml/hr in a monopolar mode. Groups B (n=10) and C (n=10) were infused with 0.9% NaCl at a rate of 15 and 30ml/hr, respectively in dual electrode bipolar mode; groups D (n=10) and E (n=10) were infused with 5.8% NaCl at a rate of 15 and 30ml/hr, respectively in a dual electrode bipolar mode. The dimensions of the ablation zones in the gross specimens from the groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance by means of the Scheffe test (post-hoc testing). Results: The mean largest diameter of the ablation zones was larger in dual electrode bipolar mode ($30.9{\pm}4.4$ mm) than in monopolar mode ($22.5{\pm}3.5$ mm). The mean smallest diameter of the ablation zones was larger in dual electrode bipolar mode ($22.3{\pm}2.5$ mm) than in monopolar mode ($19.5{\pm}3.5$ mm). There were significant differences in the largest and smallest dimension between the mono polar (group A) and dual electrode wet bipolar mode (groups B-E). In dual electrode bipolar mode, the mean largest diameter of the ablation zones was larger at an infusion rate of 15ml/hr ($34.2{\pm}4.0$ mm) than at 30 ml/hr ($27.6{\pm}0.1$ mm), and the mean smallest diameter of the ablation zones was larger at an infusion rate of 15ml/hr ($27.2{\pm}7.5$ mm) than at an infusion rate of 30ml/hr ($24{\pm}2.9$ mm). Conclusion: Using a wet electrode, dual electrode bipolar RFA can create a larger ablation zone more efficiently than monopolar RFA.

Keywords

References

  1. Jin GY, Lee JM, Lee YC, Han YM, Lim YS. Primary and secondary lung malignancies treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: evaluation with follow-up helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1013-1020 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831013
  2. Jin GY, Lee JM, Lee YC, Han YM. Acute cerebral infarction after radiofrequency ablation of an atypical carcinoid pulmonary tumor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:990-992 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.4.1820990
  3. Lee JM, Jin GY, Goldberg SN, Lee YC, Chung GH, Han YM, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer and metastases: preliminary report. Radiology 2004;230:125-134 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2301020934
  4. Belfiore G, Moggio G, Tedeschi E, Greco M, Cioffi R, Cincotti F, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation: a potential complementary therapy for patients with unresectable primary lung cancer-a preliminary report of 33 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1003-1011 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831003
  5. Steinke K, King J, Glenn DW, Morris DL. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors with expandable needle electrodes: tips from preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:605-611 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830605
  6. Gadaleta C, Mattioli V, Colucci G, Cramarossa A, Lorusso V, Canniello E, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 40 lung neoplasms: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:361-368 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.2.1830361
  7. Steinke K, Glenn D, King J, Clark W, Zhao J, Clingan P, et al. Percutaneous imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases: 1-year followup. Ann Surg Onco 2004;11:207-212 https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.04.008
  8. Lee JM, Han JK, Kim SH, Shin KS, Lee JY, Park HS, et al. Comparison of wet radiofrequency ablation with dry radiofrequency ablation and radiofrequency ablation using hypertonic saline preinjection: ex vivo bovine liver. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:258-265 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.258
  9. Lee JM, Kim SW, Li CA, Youk JH, Kim YK, Jin Z, et al. Salineenhanced radiofrequency thermal ablation of the lung: a feasibility study in rabbits. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:245-253 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2002.3.4.245
  10. Lee JM, Han JK, Kim SH, Sohn KL, Lee KH, Ah SK, et al. A comparative experimental study of the in-vitro efficiency of hypertonic saline-enhanced hepatic bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency ablation. Korean J Radiol 2003;4:163-169 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2003.4.3.163
  11. Burdio F, Guemes A, Burdio JM, Castiella T, De Gregorio MA, Lozano R, et al. Hepatic lesion ablation with bipolar salineenhanced radiofrequency in the audible spectrum. Acad Radiol 1999;6:680-686 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80117-2
  12. Burdio F, Burdio JM, Navarro A, Ros P, Guemes A, Sousa R, et al. Electric influence of NaCl concentration into the tissue in radiofrequency ablation. Radiology 2004;232:932 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2323040324
  13. Denys AL, De Baere T, Kuoch V, Dupas B, Chevallier P, Madoff DC, et al. Radio-frequency tissue ablation of the liver: in vivo and ex vivo experiments with four different systems. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2346-2352 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1970-0
  14. Gazelle GS, Goldberg SN, Solbiati L, Livraghi T. Tumor ablation with radio-frequency energy. Radiology 2000; 217:633-646 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc26633
  15. Choi D, Lim HK, Kim MJ, Lee J, Kim SK, Kim EY, et al. Overlapping ablation using a coaxial radiofrequency electrode and multiple cannulae system: experimental study in ex-vivo bovine liver. Korean J Radiol 2003;4:117-123 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2003.4.2.117
  16. Lee JM, Youk JH, Kim YK, Han YM, Chung GH, Lee SY, et al. Radio-frequency thermal ablation with hypertonic saline solution injection of the lung: ex vivo and in vivo feasibility studies. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2540-2547 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1876-x
  17. Goldberg SN, Ahmed M, Gazelle GS, Kruskal JB, Huertas JC, Halpern EF, et al. Radio-frequency thermal ablation with NaCl solution injection: effect of electrical conductivity on tissue heating and coagulation-phantom and porcine liver study. Radiology 2001;219:157-165 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap27157
  18. Ni Y, Miao Y, Mulier S, Yu J, Baert AL, Marchal G. A novel 'cooled-wet' electrode for radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol 2000;10:852-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300051018
  19. McGahan JP, Gu WZ, Brock JM, Tesluk H, Jones CD. Hepatic ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrocautery. Acad Radiol 1996;3:418-422 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80677-4
  20. Curley SA, Davidson BS, Fleming RY, Izzo F, Stephens LC, Tinkey P, et al. Laparoscopically guided bipolar radiofrequency ablation of areas of porcine liver. Surg Endosc 1997;11:729-733 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900437
  21. Haemmerich D, Tungjitkusolmun S, Staelin ST, Lee FT Jr, Mahvi DM, Webster JG. Finite-element analysis of hepatic multiple probe radio-frequency ablation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002;49:836-842 https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2002.800790
  22. Haemmerich D, Staelin ST, Tungjitkusolmun S, Lee FT Jr, Mahvi DM, Webster JG. Hepatic bipolar radio-frequency ablation between separated multiprong electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001;48:1145-1152 https://doi.org/10.1109/10.951517
  23. Miao Y, Ni Y, Yu J, Zhang H, Baert A, Marchal G. An ex vivo study on radiofrequency tissue ablation: increased lesion size by using an 'expandable-wet' electrode. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1841-1847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300100891
  24. Lobo SM, Afzal KS, Ahmed M, Kruskal JB, Lenkinski RE, Goldberg SN. Radiofrequency ablation: modeling the enhanced temperature response to adjuvant NaCl pretreatment. Radiology 2004;230:175-182 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2301021512
  25. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Solbiati L, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency tissue ablation: increased lesion diameter with a perfusion electrode. Acad Radiol 1996;3:636-644 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80188-7
  26. Cosman ER, Nashold BS, Ovelman-Levitt J. Theoretical aspects of radiofrequency lesions in the dorsal root entry zone. Neurosurgery 1984;15:945-950 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198412000-00035
  27. Burdio F, Guemes A, Burdio JM, Navarro A, Sousa R, Castiella T, et al. Bipolar saline-enhanced electrode for radiofrequency ablation: results of experimental study of in vivo porcine liver. Radiology 2003;229:447-456 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2292020978