MR Imaging Findings of Ovarian Cystadenofibroma: Clues for Making the Differential Diagnosis from Ovarian Malignancy

  • Byun, Jae-Young (Department of Radiology, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Published : 2006.09.30

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Compton HL, Finck FM. Serous adenofibroma and cystadenofibroma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol 1970;36:636-645
  2. Czernobilsky B, Borenstein R, Lancet M. Cystadenofibroma of the ovary. A clinicopathologic study of 34 cases and comparison with serous cystadenoma. Cancer 1974;34:1971-1981 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197412)34:6<1971::AID-CNCR2820340616>3.0.CO;2-N
  3. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Talerman A, Dunton C. Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Mag Reson Imaging 1997;7:465-471 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880070303
  4. Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2000;20:1445-1470 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se101445
  5. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Kusaka M, Shimazu H, Yoshida S, Nishitani H, et al. Ovarian cystadenofibromas: characteristic magnetic resonance findings with pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:871-873 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200311000-00007
  6. Kim KA, Park CM, Lee JH, Kim HK, Cho SM, Kim B, et al. Benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1259-1265 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821259
  7. Cho SM, Byun JY, Rha SE, Jung SE, Park GS, Kim BK, et al. CT and MRI findings of cystadenofibromas of the ovary. Eur Radiol 2004;14:798-804 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2060-z
  8. Ghossain MA, Buy JN, Ligneres C, Bazot M, Hassen K, Malbec L, et al. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: comparison of MR and CT findings. Radiology 1991;181:863-870 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.181.3.1947112
  9. Jung DC, Kim SH, Kim SH. MR imaging findings of ovarian cystadenofibroma and cystadenocarcinofibroma: clues for differential diagnosis. Korean J Radiol 2006;7:199-204 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2006.7.3.199
  10. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, Kinkel K, Yu KK, Sica G, et al. Complex adenxal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate analysis. Radiology 2000;214:39-46 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja3939
  11. Stevens SK, Hricak H, Stern JL. Ovarian lesions: detection and haracterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1991;181:481-488 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924792
  12. Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung JI, Hahn ST. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2002;22:1305-1325 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.226025033
  13. Moon WJ, Koh BH, Kim SK, Kim YS, Rhim HC, Cho OK, et al. Brenner tumor of the ovary: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:72-76 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200001000-00015
  14. Kim SH, Kim WH, Park KJ, Lee JK, Kim JS. CT and MR findings of Krukenburg tumors: comparison with primary ovarian tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:393-398 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199605000-00013
  15. Joja I, Asakawa T, Mitsumori A, Nakagawa T, Hiraki Y, Kudo T, et al. Struma ovarii: appearance on MR images. Abdom Imaging 1998;23:652-656 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900424
  16. Gougoutas CA, Siegelman ES, Hunt J, Outwater EK. Pelvic endometriosis: various manifestations and MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:353-358 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750353