Volumetric Measurements of Lung Nodules with Multi-Detector Row CT: Effect of Changes in Lung Volume

  • Goo, Jin-Mo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Gi (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC) ;
  • Gierada, David S. (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine) ;
  • Castro, Mario (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine) ;
  • Bae, Kyong-Tae T. (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2006.12.31

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate how changes in lung volume affect volumetric measurements of lung nodules using a multi-detector row CT. Materials and Methods: Ten subjects with asthma or chronic bronchitis who had one or more lung nodules were included. For each subject, two sets of CT images were obtained at inspiration and at expiration. A total of 33 nodules (23 nodules ${\geq}3mm$) were identified and their volume measured using a semiautomatic volume measurement program. Differences between nodule volume on inspiration and expiration were compared using the paired t-test. Percent differences, between on inspiration and expiration, in nodule attenuation, total lung volume, whole lung attenuation, and regional lung attenuation, were computed and compared with percent difference in nodule volume determined by linear correlation analysis. Results: The difference in nodule volume observed between inspiration and expiration was significant (p<0.01); the mean percent difference in lung nodule volume was 23.1% for all nodules and for nodules ${\geq}3mm$. The volume of nodules was measured to be larger on expiration CT than on inspiration CT (28 out of 33 nodules; 19 out of 23 nodules ${\geq}3mm$). A statistically significant correlation was found between the percent difference of lung nodule volume and lung volume or regional lung attenuation (p<0.05) for nodules ${\geq}3mm$. Conclusion: Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules were significantly affected by changes in lung volume. The variability in this respiration-related measurement should be considered to determine whether growth has occurred in a lung nodule.

Keywords

References

  1. Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R. Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2378-2383 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1915-7
  2. Benjamin MS, Drucker EA, McLoud TC, Shepard JA. Small pulmonary nodules: detection at chest CT and outcome. Radiology 2003;226:489-493 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2262010556
  3. Goo JM, Chung MJ, Lee HJ, Im JG. Posterior subpleural nodules in patients with underlying malignancies: value of prone computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:274- 278 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200303000-00029
  4. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, Midthun DE, Sloan JA, Sykes AM, et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003;226:756-761 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2263020036
  5. Diederich S, Thomas M, Semik M, Lenzen H, Roos N, Weber A, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers. Eur Radiol 2004;14:691-702 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2200-5
  6. Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 2000;217:251-256 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc33251
  7. Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL, Babb JS, Betke M, McGuinness G, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT—phantom study. Radiology 2003;228:864-870 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2283020059
  8. Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Meyer CA, Liang Y, Aisen AM, Tarver RD, et al. Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. Radiology 2003;229:184-194 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2291020859
  9. Goo JM, Tongdee T, Tongdee R, Yeo K, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT. Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multidetector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. Radiology 2005;235:850-856 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040737
  10. Revel MP, Lefort C, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Chatellier G, et al. Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology 2004;231:459- 466 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030241
  11. Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, Marheine A, Beyer F, Heindel W, et al. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 2004;14:86-92 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2132-0
  12. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, November 1986. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:225-244 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/136.1.225
  13. Proceedings of the ATS workshop on refractory asthma: current understanding, recommendations, and unanswered questions. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:2341-2351 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.6.ats9-00
  14. Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Pilgram TK, Crouch L, Slone RM, Bae KT, et al. Repeatability of quantitative CT indexes of emphysema in patients evaluated for lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 2001;220:448-454 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.220.2.r01au46448
  15. Goo JM, Lee JW, Lee HJ, Kim S, Kim JH, Im JG. Automated lung nodule detection at low-dose CT: preliminary experience. Korean J Radiol 2003;4:211-216 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2003.4.4.211
  16. Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, Komi M, Hayakawa H, Hori S, et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 2004;230:347-352 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2302030049
  17. Lee JW, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Kim JH, Kim S, Kim YT. The potential contribution of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodule detection in multidetector row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2004;39:649-655 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200411000-00001
  18. Wormanns D, Beyer F, Diederich S, Ludwig K, Heindel W. Diagnostic performance of a commercially available computeraided diagnosis system for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules: comparison with single and double reading. Rofo 2004; 176:953-958 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-813251
  19. Kim KG, Goo JM, Kim JH, Lee HJ, Min BG, Bae KT, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of localized ground-glass opacity in the lung at CT: initial experience. Radiology 2005;237:657-661 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372041461
  20. Kostis WJ, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Fluture SC, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of threedimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. Radiology 2004;231:446-452 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030553
  21. Novak CL, Shen H, Odry BL, McGuinness G, Naidich DP. Variability of volume measurements of small lung nodules with respiration (abstr). Radiology 2003;229(P):619
  22. Testempassi E, Vantali V, Katsou G, Peppas C, Baltas D, Chondros D. Comparison of the size of lung nodules on CT images during inspiration and expiration (abstr). Radiology 2004;233(P):571
  23. Kauczor HU, Hast J, Heussel CP, Schlegel J, Mildenberger P, Thelen M. CT attenuation of paired HRCT scans obtained at full inspiratory/expiratory position: comparison with pulmonary function tests. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2757-2763
  24. Lee KN, Yoon SK, Sohn CH, Choi PJ, Webb WR. Dependent lung opacity at thin-section CT: evaluation by spirometricallygated CT of the influence of lung volume. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:24-29 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2002.3.1.24