한국IT서비스학회지 (Journal of Information Technology Services)

한국IT서비스학회 (Korea Society of IT Services)
권호 표지

기술이전을 통한 기술사업화에 영향을 미치는 기업자원요인 탐색연구

Effects of Strategic Resources on Technology Commercialization

  • 김경환 (성균관대학교 산학협력단) ;
  • 현선해 (성균관대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 최영진 (서울보건대학 병원경영학과)
  • 발행 : 2006.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this research was to examine the factors that affect colleges that play an important role in technology commercialization as technology provider, and enterprises as technology user engaging in technology transfer commercialization by dividing it into strategic resource factor. And this study was also intended to present a strategic meaning and perspective relative to colleges and enterprises as well. To do this, those factors that have influences on technology transfer commercialization were elicited through investigation of literatures, and classified into strategic resource factors to suit research purpose, and based on these information, research hypothesis and research model were established and designed. Research results improved that some enterprises among benefited from technology transfer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 최만기, 신창호, 김승호, '연구개발집단의 자 원 및 제도적특성, 지식경영활동 및지식경영 성과에 관한 연구', 인사조직연구 제9권 (2001), pp.57-75
  2. Barney, J. B., 'Firm Resource anad sustained Competitive advantage', Journal of Management, No.7(1991), pp.99-120
  3. Bozeman, B. and Coker, K., 'Assessing the effective of technology transfer from US government R&D labortories : The impact of market orientation', Technovation, No.12(1992), pp.239-255
  4. Brett, David, Gibson V., and Smilor R. W., 'University Spin-off Companies : Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer', Southern Economic Journal, Vol.60, No.2(1993), pp.505-506 https://doi.org/10.2307/1060097
  5. Collis, D. J., 'A resource-based analysis of global competition: The case of the bearings industry', Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12(1991), pp.49-68 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120105
  6. Deeds, D. L., Hill, C. W. L. 'An Examination of Opportunistic Action Within Research. Alliances', Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.14, No.2(1999), pp.141-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00069-4
  7. Dierickx, I., K. Cool., 'Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage', Management Science, Vol.35 No.12(1989), pp.1504-1511 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
  8. Dill. D. D, 'University-industry enterpreneurship : the organization and management of American university technology transfer units', Higher Education, No.29 (1995), pp.369-384
  9. Grant, R. M., 'The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage : Implications for Strategy Formulation', California Management Review, Vol.33, No.1(1991), pp. 114-135 https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  10. Hall, R., 'The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources', Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, No.2(1992), pp.135-144 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130205
  11. Hauksson, Arni, The Commercialization of University Research Discoveries : Are University Technology Transfer Offices Stimulating the Process?, MIT, 1998
  12. Jensen, R. and M. Thursby, 'Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions', American Economic Review, 1999
  13. Kramer, P. B., 'Induced investments and jobs produced by exclusive patent licenses- A confirmatory study', Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, No.9(1997), pp.1-9
  14. Matkin, G. W., 'Technology and public policy : Lessons from a case study', Policy Studies Journal, No.22(1994), pp.371-383
  15. Peteraf, M., 'The cornerstones of competitive advantage : A resource-based view', Strategic Management Journal, No.14 (1993), pp.179-191
  16. Phillips, A., 'PATENTS, POTENTIAL COMPETITION, AND TECHNICAL PROGRESS', American Economic Review, Vol.56 Issue 2(1966), pp.301-310
  17. Powers. B. J., Academic enterpreneurships in higher education : Institutional effects on Performances of University Technology Transfer, Indiana University, 2000
  18. Praharad, C. K., Hamel Carry. 'he core competence of the corporation', Harard Business Review, No.68(1990), pp.79-91
  19. Roberts, E. B., Malone, D. E., 'Policies and Structures for Spinning Off new Companies From Research and Development Organizations', R&D Management, Vol.26, No.1(1996), pp.17-48 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00927.x
  20. Rumelt, R. P., Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1974
  21. Siegel, D., Waldman, D. and Link, A., Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices : An exploratory study. Unpublished manuscript, 1999
  22. Teece, D. J., 'Profiting from technological innovation : implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy', Research Policy, No.15(1986) pp.285-305
  23. Thursby J. and Thursby, M., 'Industry Perspectives on Licensing University Technologies : Sources and Problems', The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, No.12(2000), pp.9-22
  24. Wernerfelt B., 'A Resource-Based View of the Firm', Strategic Management Journal, 5(1984), pp.171-180 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  25. Zahra, S. A., Bogner, W. C., 'Technology strategy and software new venturesperformance : exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment', Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.15 No.2 (2000), pp.135-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00009-3