Desorption Efficiencies and Storage Stabilities of Ketones in Work Environment

작업장에서 발생되는 케톤류 유기화합물의 탈착효율 및 저장안정성

  • Kim, Kangyoon (Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health, Korean Industrial Health Association) ;
  • Choi, Sungpil (Seoul Gwanak Regional Office, Seoul Regional Administration, Ministry of Labor) ;
  • Ha, Chul-Joo (Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health, Korean Industrial Health Association) ;
  • Choi, Ho-Chun (Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health, Korean Industrial Health Association)
  • 김강윤 (대한산업보건협회산업보건환경연구원) ;
  • 최성필 (노동부서울지방노동청서울관악지청) ;
  • 하철주 (대한산업보건협회산업보건환경연구원) ;
  • 최호춘 (대한산업보건협회산업보건환경연구원)
  • Received : 2006.04.06
  • Accepted : 2006.06.15
  • Published : 2006.09.30

Abstract

This study was performed to compare with desorption efficiency and storage stability of CSC and CMS tubes for Ketones in workplace air. 1. The best desorbing solution for CSC tube was 1 % or 3 % dimethylformamide(DMF) in carbon disulfide($CS_2$). The desorption efficiencies were 96.40 % for cyclohexanone, 94.86 % for acetone, 96.96 % for methyl ethyl ketone(MEK), 103.44 % for methyl isobutyl ketone(MIBK), 100.17 % for methyl amyl ketone(MAK), 100.43 % for methyl butyl ketone(MBK), 97.01 % for toluene and 99.33 % for trichloroethylene(TCE). 2. The best desorbing solution for CMS tube was 1 % or 3 % DMF in $CS_2$. The desorption efficiencies were 96.42 % for cyclohexanone, 98.53 % for acetone, 99.67 % for MEK, 105.48 % for MIBK, 100.13 % for MAK, 100.13 % for MBK, 95.42 % for toluene and 98.15 % for TCE. 3. In the storage condition at room temperature($20^{\circ}C$), the recovery rates of cyclohexanone and MEK on CSC tube were rapidly decreased 30.9 % and 50.9 % after 4 weeks, respectively. The recovery rates of all of 6 ketones and 2 nonpolar solvents were shown over 80 % after 1 week in the storage condition of refrigerate temperature($-4^{\circ}C$), and were kept over 80 % after 4 weeks in the storage condition of freezer temperature($-20^{\circ}C$). 4. The recovery rates of cyclohexanone on CMS tube were 80.6 % for 1 week after and 60.5 % for 4 weeks after at room temperature($20^{\circ}C$). The recovery rates of cyclohexanone were shown 80.6 % for 1 week after and 60.5 % for 4 weeks after at $-4^{\circ}C$, and of 6 ketones and 2 non-polar solvents were kept stable over 85 % at $-4^{\circ}C$ and over 97 % at $-20^{\circ}C$ for 4 weeks after. In conclusion, the best desorbing solution was 1 % or 3 % DMF in $CS_2$ and more appropriate sorbent tube for ketones and non-polar solvents was CMS than CSC. We recommend CSC tube would be useful if the samples analyzed within 1 week because CMS tubes are more expensive than CSC tubes. However, if the storage time is needed more than 3 weeks, CMS tubes should be suitable and the storage condition should be below $-20^{\circ}C$.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경란, 백남원(1995). 활성탄관에 포집된 극성유기용제의 탈착효율에 관한 연구. 한국산업위생학회 1995; 5(1): 104-118
  2. 김강윤, 노인봉, 김현욱. 활성탄관에 포집된 혼합 유기용제의 보조탈착용매 변화에 따른 탈착률 비교. 한국산업위생학회 1996; 6(2): 209-221
  3. 손연주, 김현욱. 활성탄관에 포집된 극성 및 비극성 유기용제 분석시 탈착용매 종류에 따른 찰착효율 비교. 한국산업위생학회 1997; 7(1): 3-20
  4. Elskamp CJ, Schultz GR. An alternate sampling and analytical method for 2-butanone. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1983; 44(3): 201-204 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668391404635
  5. Folke J, Johansen I, Cohr K-H. The recovery of ketones from gassampling charcoal tubes. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1984; 45(4): 231-235 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668491399703
  6. Gjlstad M, Bergemalm-Rynell K, Goran L, Thorud S, Molander P. Comparison sampling efficiency and storage stability on different sorbents for determination of solvents in occupational air. J. Seperation Science. 2004; 27(17-18): 1531-1539 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200401887
  7. Harper M, Kimberland ML, Orr RJ, Guild LV. An evaluation of sorbents for sampling ketones in workplace air. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1993; 8(4): 293-304 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1993.10389210
  8. Levin JO, Carleborg L. Evaluation of solid sorbents for sampling ketones in work-room air. Ann Occup Hyg 1987; 31(1): 31-38 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/31.1.31
  9. NIOSH. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, [cited 2005 Mar 14]; Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/
  10. OSHA. Index of Sampling and Analytical Mehtods. [cited 2005 Mar 14]; Available from: URL: http://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/ methods/toc_m.html
  11. Rudling J. Simple model based on solubility parameters for liquid desorption of organic solvents adsorbed on activated carbon. J Chromatogr 1986; 362: 175-185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)86966-1
  12. Rudling J, Bjorkholm E. Effect of adsorbed water on solvent desorption of organic vapors collected on activated carbon. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1986; 47: 615-620 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668691390331
  13. Rudling J, Bjorkholm E, Lundmark BO. Storage stability of organic solvents adsorbed on activated carbon. Ann Occup Hyg 1986; 30(3): 319-327 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/30.3.319
  14. Saalwaechter AT, McCammon CS, Roper CP, Carlberg KS. Performance testing of the NIOSH charcoal tube technique for the determination of air concentrations of organic vapors. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1977; 38: 476-486 https://doi.org/10.1080/0002889778507654