비골골절정복술에 있어서 전사골신경과 골막 마취의 유용성

Adequacy of Local Anesthesia on the Anterior Ethmoidal Nerve and the Dorsal Periosteum for the Reduction of the Fractured Nasal Bones

  • 조재현 (연세대학교 의과대학 인체조직복원연구소, 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이혜경 (국민건강보험공단 일산병원 성형외과) ;
  • 나동균 (연세대학교 의과대학 인체조직복원연구소, 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 탁관철 (연세대학교 의과대학 인체조직복원연구소, 성형외과학교실)
  • Cho, Jae Hyun (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hye Kyung (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Rah, Dong Kyun (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Tark, Kwan Chul (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2006.02.06
  • 발행 : 2006.07.10

초록

Purpose: The nose is the most prominent skeletal feature of the face and is thus prone to frequent injury. Closed reduction of nasal bone fractures can be performed under general or local anesthesia. However, the benefits and the drawbacks in either form of anesthesia chosen are seldom perceived by the surgeon. A retrospective study was performed to assess the differences in the outcome among the two groups subjected to surgery under different type of anesthesia and to introduce our method of local anesthesia and its adequacy. Methods: Two hundred and fifteen patients during a 2-year period were included in the study. 2% Lidocaine mixed with 1:100,000 epinephrine was injected on the anterior ethmoid nerve and the periosteum. Assessment factors included intra-operative adequacy of analgesia, post-operative analgesic requirement and functional and aesthetic outcome of surgery. Results: 19 patients were manipulated under general anesthesia and 196 patients were manipulated under local anesthesia on the anterior ethmoidal nerve and dorsal periosteum. No statistically signigicant variable in performance of surgery could be attributed to the mode of anesthesia employed(p > 0.05). Four patients experienced complications after reduction. One developed septal deviation and three nasal obstruction. But, no secondary operations were needed. Conclusion: Anterior ethmoidal nerve block and dorsal periosteal injection of 2% Xylocaine, combined with topical intranasal 4% lidocaine and epinephrine provided sufficient analgesia comparable to that of general anesthesia.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tremolet deVillers Y: Nasal fractures. J Trauma 15: 319, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197504000-00008
  2. Hong SB, Choi BW, Suh IS, Ha JW: Oinical & radiologic evaluation of the nasal bone fractures. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 23: 1572, 1996
  3. Murray JA Maran AG: The treatment of nasal injuries by manipulation. J Laryngol Otol 94: 1405, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100090241
  4. Rajapakse Y, Courtney M, Bialostocki A Duncan G, Morrissey G: Nasal fractures: a study comparing local and general anaesthesia techniques. ANZ J Surg 73: 396, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-1-02615.x
  5. Illum P: Long-term results after treatment of nasal fractures. J Laryngol Otol 100: 273, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100099138
  6. Courtney MJ, Rajapakse Y, Duncan G, Morrissey G: Nasal fracture manipulation: a comparative study of general and local anaesthesia techniques. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28: 472, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00754.x
  7. Watson DJ, Parker AJ, Slack RW, Griffiths MY: Local versus general anaesthetic in the management of the fractured nose. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 13: 491, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb00323.x
  8. Yabe T, Ozawa T, Sakamoto M, Ishii M: Pre- and postoperative X-ray and computed tomography evaluation in acute nasal fracture. Ann Plast Surg 53: 547, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000139567.23921.2a
  9. Waldron J, Mitchell DB, Ford G: Reduction of fractured nasal bones; local versus general anaesthesia. Clin Oiolaryngol Allied Sci 14: 357, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1989.tb00384.x
  10. Cook JA, McRae RD, Irving RM, Dowie LN: A randomized comparison of manipulation of the fractured nose under local and general anaesthesia. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 15: 343, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1990.tb00480.x
  11. Ridder GJ, Boedeker Cc, Fradis M, Schipper J: Technique and timing for closed reduction of isolated nasal fractures: a retrospective study. Ear Nose Throat J 81: 49, 2002
  12. Chung SH, Park JI, Choe J, Baek SM: Oinical analysis of satisfaction of nasal bone reduction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 21: 984, 1994
  13. Cook JA, Murrant NJ, Evans K, Lavelle RJ: Manipulation of the fractured nose under local anaesthesia. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 17: 337, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01008.x
  14. Kholy AE: Manipulation of the fractured nose using topical local anaesthesia. J Laryngol Otol 103: 580, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100109387
  15. Jones TM, Nandapalan V: Manipulation of the fractured nose: a comparison of local infiltration anaesthesia and topical local anaesthesia. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24: 443, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00290.x