타이타니움 의치상에 대한 다양한 금속표면처리제의 적용이 첨상레진과의 결합강도에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Various Metal Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength between Titanium Denture Base and Relined Resins

  • 은준영 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 이종혁 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Eun, Jun-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various metal surface treatments on the shear bond strength between titanium denture base and relined resins. The surfaces of commercially pure(cp) titanium were sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ for 20 seconds and each group was treated with MR $Bond^{(R)}$, Alloy $Primer^{(R)}$, and Super-Bond $C&B^{(R)}$ accordingly. The specimens were completed by application of relining resins. The specimens were stored in room temperature. And the shear bond strength of the specimens were measured with the MTS universal testing $machine^{(R)}$. The results were as follows: 1. In comparison with the relining materials, $Kooliner^{(R)}$ groups showed statistically higher shear bond strength than Tokuyama Rebase $II^{(R)}$ groups(p<0.05). 2. Comparing shear bond strength, according to surface treatment, Super-bond $C&B^{(R)}$ groups showed the highest bond strength and were significantly higher than the other three groups(p<0.05). Alloy $Primer^{(R)}$ groups showed no significant difference with the MR $Bond^{(R)}$ groups, but was significantly higher than the sandblasting-only groups(p<0.05). 3. Comparing surface treatment in each groups, for two types of relining resin, the group which applies $Kooliner^{(R)}$ and Super-bond $C&B^{(R)}$ showed the highest bond strength and showed significant difference compared to the other groups(p<0.05). When using Tokuyama Rebase $II^{(R)}$, Super-bond C&B group showed the highest bond strength, but there were no significant difference compared to the Alloy $Primer^{(R)}$ group. In this limited study, applying $Kooliner^{(R)}$ and Super-Bond $C&B^{(R)}$ after sandblasting is considered to be advantageous for relining of titanium base dentures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park HJ, Kim CW, Kim YS. A study on the flexural bond strength of the gold and the Co-Cr alloy to the denture base resins. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38(4):500-509
  2. Da Silva L, Martinez A, Rilo B, Santana U. Titanium for removable denture bases. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27(2): 131-135 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00506.x
  3. Kim YI, Jeong CM, Jeon YC. Effects of metal surface treatments on the shear bond strength between Ni-Cr denture base and reline resins. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2002;40(4):396-405
  4. Lee JS, Lim JH, Cho lH. A study on the tensile strength between metal denture base and relining materials. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38(1): 1-11
  5. Park IC, Lee JK, Chung CH. A study on the tensile strength between light-cured relining resin and metal denture base. J Korean Acad Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2000;16:161-170
  6. Arena CA, Evans DB, Hilton TJ. A comparison of bond strengths among chairside hard reline materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70(2):126-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90006-A
  7. Taira Y, Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effects of a metal etchant and two primers on resin bonding durability to titanium. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112(1):95-100 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00090.x
  8. Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Taira Y, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(2): 121-126 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00811.x
  9. Ishijima T, Caputo AA, Mito R. Adhesion of resin to casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(4):445-449 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90070-Q
  10. May KB, Fox J, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Silane to enhance the bond between polymethyl methacrylate and titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73(5):428-431 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80070-8
  11. Pesun S, Mazurat RD. Bond strength of acrylic resin to cobalt-chromium alloy treated with the Silicoater MD and Kevloc systems. J Can Dent Assoc 1998;64(11):798-802
  12. Ohkubo C, Watanabe I, Hosoi T, Okabe T. Shear bond strengths of polymethyl methacrylate to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium frameworks using five metal primers. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(1):50-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70088-6
  13. Choi NJ, Vang MS. The effects of metal surface treatment on bond strength between resin and metal interface of resin veneered crown. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1994;32(4):471-493
  14. May KB, Van Putten MC, Bow DA, Lang BR. 4-META polymethyl methacrylate shear bond strength to titanium. Oper Dent 1997;22(1):37-40
  15. Taria Y. Yoshida K. Matsumura H. Atsuta M. Phosphate and thiophosphate primers for bonding prosthodontic luting materials to titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1998:79:384-388 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70149-0
  16. Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. Laboratory evaluation of a metal-priming agent for adhesive bonding. Quintessence Int 2000;31(10):749-752
  17. Jacobson TE, Chang JC, Keri PP, Watanabe LG. Bond Strength of 4-META acrylic resin denture base to cobalt chromium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60 (5):570-576 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90216-8
  18. Ryu YR, Urn JH, Cho JH. A study on the shear bond strength between nonprecious metal surface and resin cement according to the various surface treatment methods. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001;39(2): 157170
  19. Khasawne S, al-Wahadni A, Lloyd CH. Comparison of Bond Strengths Between Adhesive and Conventional Acrylic Resins to Cobalt Chromium Denture Base Alloy. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2003; 11(3): 119-124
  20. Jin JS, Kim KH, Lee CH, Jo KH. Effect of cobalt-chromium alloy surface treatment when bonding with 4-META/MMA-TBB resin. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38(4):510-525
  21. Lee JH, Jung EM, Jang BS, Chung DJ, Heo SJ, Han DH, Shim JS. : Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of denture base resins to dental alloy. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2002;40(4):344-350
  22. NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Comparison of bond strengths of denture base resins to nickel-chromium-beryllium removable partial denture alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78(6):566-573 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70007-6
  23. NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Comparison of bond strengths of three denture base resins to treated nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(3):354-361 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70137-4
  24. Park JI, Kwon JH, Lee HH, Cho HW. Bond strength between cobalt-chromium alloy and denture base resin according to adhesive primers. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38(2):160-168
  25. Taira Y, Imai Y. Primer for bonding resin to metal Dent Mater 1995;11(1):2-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80001-8
  26. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsutta M. Adhesive primers for bonding cobalt-chromium alloy to resin. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(6):475-478 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00397.x
  27. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsula M. Effect of adhesive metal primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metals. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:357-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90180-V
  28. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Sawase T, Atsuta M. Effects of adhesive primers on bond strength of self-curing resin to cobalt-chromium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(6):617-620 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70104-5
  29. Watanabe I, Matsumura H and Atsuta H. Effect of two metal primers on adhesive bonding with type 4 gold alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:299-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80209-4
  30. Lee SY, Vang MS. The effects of thermocyc1ing on the bond strength between cobalt-chromium alloy and denture base resin. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38(1):38-49
  31. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocyc1ing on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(2):184-189 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00261-0