귀 앞 피부 전 절제술을 이용한 중안면 거상술

Mid-face Lift with Preauricular Pre-excision Technique

  • 이민우 (인제대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 정재학 (인제대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김영환 (인제대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 선욱 (인제대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Lee, Min Woo (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Inje University) ;
  • Jung, Jae Hak (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Young Hwan (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Inje University) ;
  • Sun, Hook (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Inje University)
  • 투고 : 2006.03.16
  • 발행 : 2006.07.10

초록

Purpose: Facial nerve injury is a rare but feared complication of face lift. Uncertainty as to the depth and vulnerability of the facial nerve in face lift dissection causes some surgeon, particularly novices, to dissect slowly. Excessively thin flaps can be made because of fear of nerve injury, contributing to skin slough. Methods: From September 1998 to February 2003, the authors operated on 34 aging face patients using classical face-lift. We had analysed about quantity of skin removal and degree of elevated flap. The authors have found quantity of skin removal was 1.5-2.0 cm, degree of elevated flap was 40-45 degree on average. Results: The authors performed preauricular pre-excision face-lift technique on 12 aging face patients from July 2003 to Feburary 2005 based on experienced surgery. This technique reduced fear of dissecting skin flap necrosis and facial nerve injury because of firmly attached pre-auricular skin removed in advance. Conclusions: We easily dissected SMAS without visual field disturbance, nerve damage and reduced operation time and bleeding loss compared to classical face-lift.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hamra ST: The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 86: 53, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199007000-00008
  2. Ramirez OM, Maillard GF, Musolas A: The extended subperiosteal face lift: a definite soft tissue remodeling for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 88: 227, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199108000-00009
  3. Barton FE Jr: Rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 90: 601, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199210000-00008
  4. Kang YW, Yoo WM, Kim JM, Park BY: Face lift with SMAS and FAME(finger assisted malar fat elevation) technique. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 28: 493, 2001
  5. Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL: The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 441, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199203000-00007
  6. Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Baker TM: Refinements in face lifting: enhanced facial contour using vicyrl mesh incor-porated into SMAS fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 290, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200001000-00046
  7. Rudolph R: Depth of the facial nerve in face lift dissections. Plast Reconstr Surg 85: 537, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199004000-00008
  8. Knize DM: Preauricular face lift incisions and the auricular anchor. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 1508, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199910000-00042